Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?
Fascism is a political belief
So because some judges are capable of doing mental gymnastics, that makes the Constitution thte legal cornerstone of abortion rights?
Im willing to bet if you asked the Founders whether the Constitution was designed to protect the "rights" of people to kill their unborn children, you'd get a unanimous response that it wasn't.
non-sequiturNobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?
How much do you or anyone else suffer by not committing suicide?The idea that ending suffering is justification for murder
Murder? How is it murder to help someone who is dying do so as painlessly as possible?
Fascism can also be characterized by a demonization of a certain group of individuals (babies) which justifies murdering them.
Yes.Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?
Does it matter?
If the child exists as an individual, then the welfare and suffering of the child must be considered. The child becomes a second patient to whom the doctor has no less an obligation than to the mother.The point of wanting to abort was about the parents suffering not the childs
So because some judges are capable of doing mental gymnastics, that makes the Constitution thte legal cornerstone of abortion rights?
Im willing to bet if you asked the Founders whether the Constitution was designed to protect the "rights" of people to kill their unborn children, you'd get a unanimous response that it wasn't.
That would be question begging. You're presuming the impropriety of abortion (by referring to it as "killing unborn children") and then pose the question whether it's okay.
The constitution protects a person's privacy, including the privacy of making medical decisions with one's doctor. The fact that you do not like this about the constitution does not make it any less a constitutional fact. And it does not change the fact that the legality of abortion is based in the constitution, and NOT in the judiciary.
Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a reactionary, authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4]
Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A woman being kept from receiving proper medical treatment because government says so is authoritarian.
The OP has it right.
Maybe you should read a little more of that wiki article about fascism. Fascism is a political belief that the establishment of the state is the highest achievement of humanity, and government systems that are justified on such a belief. Fascist governments are authoritarian, promote nationalism and militarism, and a corporatist economy generally run by high ranking military personnel or former such personnel. Fascism promotes the belief that violence and war are necessary for the survival of a nation, as a means to maintain and reignite nationalist sentiments.
So, I ask once again, what does this subject have to do with believing that establishment of the state is humanity's greatest accomplishment?
Fascism can also be characterized by a demonization of a certain group of individuals (babies) which justifies murdering them.
So if someone is certain 100% another person will die, them making their death painless a couple days before rather than a slow painful death deserves calling them a murderer?
Some people will stoop to saying anything to defend the beliefs of their bureacrats.
Yes.Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?
Does it matter?
The point of wanting to abort was about the parents suffering not the childs
If the exists as an individual, then the welfare and suffering of the child must be considered. The child becomes a second patient to whom the doctor has no less an obligation than the mother.
The Constitution says nothing about abortion.
and after birth?Yes.Does it matter?
If the exists as an individual, then the welfare and suffering of the child must be considered. The child becomes a second patient to whom the doctor has no less an obligation than the mother.The point of wanting to abort was about the parents suffering not the childs
Since it matters to you - there is no indication the child suffered in the womb at all.
-I- repeat:The parts (i repeat) that do are the authoritarian and "government knows best" attributes.
It is killing the unborn. It's the very definition of Abortion. How can pointing that out be begging the question?
The Constitution says nothing about abortion.
Heck, it doesn't even mention privacy.
The legality of abortion is solely based on Roe v. Wade. There is a reason this "right" did not exist for the first 200 years of this nations existance. Because there is no Constitutional right.
Fascism can also be characterized by a demonization of a certain group of individuals (babies) which justifies murdering them.
So if someone is certain 100% another person will die, them making their death painless a couple days before rather than a slow painful death deserves calling them a murderer?
Some people will stoop to saying anything to defend the beliefs of their bureacrats.
Er..yes.
Becaue what you propose is euthanasia. It's murdering people before their time on the ass backwards assumption you're doing THEM a favor.
BTW, I'm 100 percent certain that you are going to die.
May I off you now? Save you the grief I know is coming to you?
It is killing the unborn. It's the very definition of Abortion. How can pointing that out be begging the question?
The definition of "abortion" is to end something that is already underway. Aborting a pregnancy means that you end the pregnancy when it is already underway.
You consider the fetus or embryo to be a living person.
That is your opinion, you're welcome to it. But there is scant evidence to support it
No, you are wrong. The legality of abortion is based on constitutional rights to privacy under the 4th amendmentThe legality of abortion is solely based on Roe v. Wade. There is a reason this "right" did not exist for the first 200 years of this nations existance. Because there is no Constitutional right.
China is considered fascist now?The parts (i repeat) that do are the authoritarian and "government knows best" attributes.