facist law forces mom to give birth just to watch the child die 15 minutes later

Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a reactionary, authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4]

Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A woman being kept from receiving proper medical treatment because government says so is authoritarian.

The OP has it right.
 
Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a reactionary, authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4]
Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A woman being kept from receiving proper medical treatment because government says so is authoritarian.
Only if you redefine "authoritarian" to suit your need.
Never mind that there are several facets necessary to fascism that you've left out.
 
Last edited:
Fascism can also be characterized by a demonization of a certain group of individuals (babies) which justifies murdering them.
 
Still not seeing what this has to do with fascism.

Well it has to do with fascism because the nazi's clearly opposed abortion... no wait... that's wrong.

Well, it has to be because of the honesty of the pro abortion crowds... oh wait....
 
The communists oppose abortion..

Oh, wait...it's practically mandatory in China...
 
Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?

Who the hell can determine that? It's impossible.

Though generally speaking a natural death is always better than murder.
 
This doesnt change the fact that Roe is the legal cornerstone for the pro-abortion crowd, and that any legal argument made to that effect - including yours, regardless if you know it or not - flows from it.

Actually the constitution is the legal cornerstone of abortion rights. That's from where the arguments flow.
 
OKay, I've only read the thread title so far and I have one response

does the Op know what fascism is, or that just what we're calling anything we don't like now?

I've brought up that question like 3 times now, and gotten no response. I think the answer no, he doesn't know what it is, he just uses it as a catch-all term for anything unliked.
 
Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?

Who the hell can determine that? It's impossible.


Doctors can't tell whether a child seems to be experiencing pain or other physical duress?

Well pain is subjective. There's all sorts of evidence that babies in the womb emote and feel from very early on...but that doesn't stop the kill baby train from saying they aren't human and don't feel anything.
 
Nobody asks whether the child suffered- or might have suffered less if euthanize?

How much do you or anyone else suffer by not committing suicide?

The idea that ending suffering is justification for murder seems absurd to me. it misses the entire point of life. It robs people of experience.
 
Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a reactionary, authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4]

Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A woman being kept from receiving proper medical treatment because government says so is authoritarian.

The OP has it right.
Mussolini started as a socialist and his popularity was largely based in his attacks upon the capitalists

In fact, he referred to his system not only as fascism (a term he did not have a monopoly on), but also as national syndicalism


[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Anatomy-Fascism-Robert-Paxton/dp/1400040949]Amazon.com: The Anatomy of Fascism (9781400040940): Robert O. Paxton: Books[/ame]
 
This doesnt change the fact that Roe is the legal cornerstone for the pro-abortion crowd, and that any legal argument made to that effect - including yours, regardless if you know it or not - flows from it.
Actually the constitution is the legal cornerstone of abortion rights. That's from where the arguments flow.
Incorrect. Rights are protected by the Constitution, they are not granted by it. The argument regarding abortion rights can only flow from the Constittion so far as the protection of those rights.

The state may limit the exercise of a right, even to the point of eliminating said exercise, should there be a compelling state interest to do so, and that said limits, to include total prohibition, are the least restrictive means to that end.

Roe found that compelling state interest, once the pregenancy reaches a certain point.
 
Last edited:
This doesnt change the fact that Roe is the legal cornerstone for the pro-abortion crowd, and that any legal argument made to that effect - including yours, regardless if you know it or not - flows from it.

Actually the constitution is the legal cornerstone of abortion rights. That's from where the arguments flow.

So because some judges are capable of doing mental gymnastics, that makes the Constitution thte legal cornerstone of abortion rights?

Im willing to bet if you asked the Founders whether the Constitution was designed to protect the "rights" of people to kill their unborn children, you'd get a unanimous response that it wasn't.
 
Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a reactionary, authoritarian nationalist political ideology.[1][2][3][4]

Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A woman being kept from receiving proper medical treatment because government says so is authoritarian.

The OP has it right.

Maybe you should read a little more of that wiki article about fascism. Fascism is a political belief that the establishment of the state is the highest achievement of humanity, and government systems that are justified on such a belief. Fascist governments are authoritarian, promote nationalism and militarism, and a corporatist economy generally run by high ranking military personnel or former such personnel. Fascism promotes the belief that violence and war are necessary for the survival of a nation, as a means to maintain and reignite nationalist sentiments.

So, I ask once again, what does this subject have to do with believing that establishment of the state is humanity's greatest accomplishment?
 

Forum List

Back
Top