Facebook Bans Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones, Other Dangerous Figures

[impuretrash]

Fascism is coming.

I hope so

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Fascism is coming.

YA think ! certainly looks like it

dont get on the truck

 

[dblack]

Fascism is coming.

I hope so

Why? What is it you find appealing about fascism?

 

[beagle9]

Fascism is coming.

I hope so

Why? What is it you find appealing about fascism?

He's hoping to fight against it not support it.

 

[dblack]

Fascism is coming.

I hope so

Why? What is it you find appealing about fascism?

He's hoping to fight against it not support it.

What makes you think that? You think he's just kidding? Not really a fascist?

 

[emilynghiem]

Unless they misrepresent their policies to paid users and advertisers,
can't any private individual or company decide what they want or don't
want on their servers or through their networks.

Fox News picks and chooses which anchors or which advertisers or messages,
which letters from the audience get airtime etc. It's not a public channel open to just anyone.

impuretrash from what I understand:
The legal disputes where there was standing to enforce laws and policies
involved MISREPRESENTATION of the services.

So yes, if they claimed not to discriminate on the basis of content and did,
that is a violation of their advertised policies.

If they claimed not to sell or abuse user information for marketing or profit,
for example, but did such abuses of private information, yes that has been
used as the basis of taking legal action for violations of user policy.

For content, however, I am more in agreement
with Constitutionalist Mark Levin who argues that
we don't want to get into this business of trying to
regulate anyone's discretionary choices on freedom of speech and of the press.

You don't want govt REGULATING media, so whatever
Fox News or Facebook publish or don't publish, you don't
want to go down that road. Because, as Mark Levin says it:
NOTHING IS REQUIRING YOU TO USE THESE NETWORKS OR PLATFORMS.

What I will CLARIFY is IF these outlets
MISREPRESENT, VIOLATE OR ABUSE their own POSTED terms
and user agreements and/or advertising policy
SURE they can be sued for breach of contracts like any other company.

So they just need to clarify VERY specifically their right to regulate
content through their platforms and not claim to be equally inclusive or exclusive.

If they claim not to post illegal activities, yes
they should take every effort to remove those.
The problem is if extra costs or resources are needed,
then platforms such as Facebook cannot completely remove content
but can only block the public access. If you bring up the old links,
you can still find those images left online, and no group has been
able to solve this since the backlog is so huge it would take years.

(My solution to that is to enlist the efforts of all spammers, online
frauds, identity theft hackers, and make it part of their restitution
to pay the cost of hiring IT staff to remove all these images offline)

Let me get this straight. We absolutely DON'T want the govt to regulate and censor free speech but we absolutely DO want to give that power to massive multinational corporations who have NO loyalty to any nation.

No impuretrash
the corporations can be policed at the state level where they receive
licensing to operate. Any COLLECTIVE entity should and can be
held to a process of "redressing grievances" so no "collective
authority" is abused. The entities still retain equal free speech
as any individual. But we do need to end the monopoly on redressing
grievances and resolving conflicts, by implementing mediation
and conflict resolution assistance at local and state levels.

This isn't about punishing and restricting free speech and media.
But setting up access to use that to resolve conflicts to correct any abuses.

What a free mediation process depends on is equal respect for
freedom by all parties using that system.

If complainants want to abuse the system to FORCE a certain
outcome or change on the other side, that makes mediation fail.

so that's why our legal system and current mediation provisions
tend to fail, is that people abuse this for adversarial coercion
instead of REAL mediation which is about respecting and protecting
the freedom of choice of all parties to conflicts so people are truly equal.​

You are about 50 years to late. The damage has already been done, and now anything to correct it all, ends up pressing the boot down even harder onto the necks that it has been choking out for decades and decades now.

Dear beagle9
Yes and no. Of course once damage is done, the effects can't magically disappear.
What keeps the damaging conflicts going, as you describe above, is projecting conditions on how to correct the problem. However, the pattern of retribution is broken by forgiveness.

Otherwise, if we try to attack problems with anger or ill will
instead of forgiveness:​

Conflicts become like a "Chinese finger trap"


The harder we try to reject and struggle,
the faster we remain stuck, both sides.
The blame punishment and judgment we will on others,
is projected back onto us like a "boomerang" effect.
This is the notion of "bad karma" that keeps us stuck in a vicious cycle of ill will.

But when we push to meet each other in the middle,
we free ourselves from the mutual trap. That is what
forgiveness does, is set us free by having more compassion
for humanity and each other than we have blame, ill will and
projected resentment and hostility that just attracts more negative reactions.

The good news beagle9
is that the worse sacrifices and burdens that we forgive,
the greater rewards when justice is received in peace.
The greater the debts, the greater the payoff when justice is redeemed.

We just can't predict or dictate when this or how this will occur.
All we can do is make sure we don't ADD to the debt, so the struggle and suffering is prolonged.

The sooner we agree to "let go" and stop adding more pressure to the situation,
as in the Chinese finger trap, we can release the hold the situation has on us.

When we can think and see clearly, we can better understand
and communicate to address the root cause and fix the problems.
We can prevent them in the future even if the past damage is irreparable.

What we can restore is the spiritual peace of mind by forgiving the
emotional injury, and focusing on recovery and renewing good
faith relations, so that the people involved can work more effectively
in cooperation to resolve the effects and create sustainable solutions from
lessons learned. We can prevent the causes of such abuses from escalating,
and learn better skills in intervention, corrections and prevention.

So the wisdom and efficiency gained from these experiences
ends up proportional to the effort and expense it took to study, learn and teach.
That's how there is justice in the world, the payoff gained is relative to the pain endured.

So that's why it is stated in the Bible as the meek inheriting the earth,
and those who suffer persecution shall be the most blessed.

If you look at the most noble and influential peacemakers in the world,
then look at their pasts and what got them to where they are now,
you will see this common pattern.

Have to have a willing participation on the other side of the isle to get results, and that ain't happening any longer it appears. It's gone way to far, just like spoiling or brainwashing the children or doing the same to generation after generation for life, it is becoming that serious of a problem more and more these days. Most say it's over, but is it really ??

Intimidation and deplorabalism has been allowed to grow out of control in America, and it is spreading like a wild fire across this once great and very blessed land that we all live upon together. No one wants this, not even those who were indoctrinated into the bullcrap in which makes them part of the problem instead of part of the solution, but they are brainwashed and therefore don't know any better any longer.

Soon there won't be anywhere to get away from it, and your children will be trapped unless you are one of the special one's with the skills to by pass it temporarily through being born with that proverbial silver spoon in hand or you were born into a clique that is shrinking faster and faster as things get worse and worse for even those in these cliques or exist along the edges of the cliques.

I've seen in my years alive, entire communities, towns, and cities fall as they were taken over by the poorly guided impoverished within our societies. Now maybe I'm living or have lived in some sort of bubble that tells me and/or shows me these things only exist in that bubble, but I don't think so. It appears to have grown or is growing exponentially over the years.

I couple these things with nation wide events that are reported on the news, and by watching the programming trends coming out of Hollyweird in order to get the patterns being seen in it all, and then watching the actions of the people.

Many know these things, see these things, and experience these things, but have been made powerless to change it because they are labeled one of the labels in which sets off the radars of the brainwashed minions for whom in their brainwashing are programmed to protect their newly formed hives.

The federal government highjacked by certain elements over the years, of course has made all this possible.

It is why we are witnessing this urge to take back power by those in support of it all, and this in order to continue the transformation to these things faster and faster... It is of the up most importance to the leaders of their brainwashed bee hive's come 2020.

We went to an estate auction a good while back in a fallen community (no tresspassing signs nailed to the trees in all the front yards, beware of dog signs, camera surveillance signs etc..... In this community they still had some elderly trapped within this community, in which appeared to be falling down all around them. In the situation a family member had passed away leaving the elderly lady in the community by herself. She had an auction company auction off everything as fast as she could, and got out as fast as she could.

These people who ever they were, had a real nice place (well kept), and had nothing but quality stuff through in and through out.

After the auction you wouldn't believe how cheap everything went for. Unbelievable and sad all at the same time. Can't blame her though, because no one in their right mind would want to live in that drug invested, crime riddled community any longer, and especially at an old age in life. Trash was on the roads, keep out signs every where, broken down homes (no maintenance), and impoverished elements roaming the streets.

It was prime property (I would bet), found in these communities back in the day, but they are wasted now.

Poverty doesn't mean that people have to be bad while in their transition from poverty to non-poverty, but when you see the kind of entrenched poverty the government creates (dependency), and you see those in that poverty being exploited and used by the powerful in hopes to keep them in that capacity/power/roll for nefarious reasons, then Houston we have a huge problem in America.

Dear beagle9
1. It really depends on and varies with each person, whether we can focus on and do right
regardless what direction the rest of the crowd appears to be going.

Just because 80-90% of the people are following mob or pack mentality
doesn't mean we can't make plenty of progress with the 10-20%
who can think and act independently, and invest in solutions
instead of running with the narrative of helpless victimhood and dependence on
elections and govt to "rescue us from them."

2. From your description above, I agree that's what's been escalating up to this point.

I'd been fighting this uphill battle, and just not getting anywhere
because politics keeps rewarding the bigger bullies, sucking all the money
and attention into "hate/negative" campaigns that are more effective short-term for election results
rather than "the slow and steady" approach of investing in LONG TERM solutions that don't win elections overnight.
The longterm approaches can take 10 years to get going and 30+ years to be recognized as "established" solutions.

So given the political culture, the REAL solutions had not been able to compete with the short term gains
using the current adversarial dominance approach of playing people and media for points.

3. However, things have reached a new level of deadlocking.
Since we can't win this way, but only incur more losses, debts and damages on
both sides, the time is right for taking a totally different approach.

These negative attack methods are not producing solutions
but either doubling the problems or canceling sides out:
Investigating Trump vs. Clinton, Demanding support for the Wall vs. Dream Act,
Health Care as a national crisis or border crime and trafficking as an invasion,
defending LGBT and banning conversion therapy vs. defending right to life and banning abortion.

None of these "one way" battles to bulldoze over the other side is winning the domination contest.
The Defense for the other sides' beliefs are not backing down.

It's like hitting ROCK BOTTOM where the only way to go is up.

What's interesting is that NOW when I ask people to consider solutions that appeal to both sides,
NOW there's a chance for the REAL solutions to stand out. Nothing else is working,
so whatever approach takes to appease both is going to rise to the forefront.

It's like the background noise has become so deafening,
the clear voice of reason and visionary solutions take center stage.

Again beagle9 it really depends on each person, how ready each of us is to
drop the dead end game, and recognize solutions that stand out in comparison.

I've seen "wars of attrition" wear people out until they couldn't fight back.
At this point, both sides are getting nowhere with the opposition.

When this negative gaming burns through everything that can possibly be used as fuel,
by process of elimination, whatever leads to sustainable solutions will be the only thing left.
Everything else will go down in attacks.

So by default, by pure selfish greed for demanding what will satisfy each side,
we will eventually arrive at a central, universal agreement. Nothing else will work!

 

[Zorro!]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

 

[dblack]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

Big government! You guys just can't get a enough.

 

[Zorro!]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

Big government! You guys just can't get a enough.

Suddenly the Lefties and the anti-Trumpers hate taxes? Too late!

 

[dblack]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

Big government! You guys just can't get a enough.

Suddenly the Lefties and the anti-Trumpers hate taxes? Too late!

Indeed it is. Trumpsters aren't conservatives, and they sure as hell aren't libertarians. They love big government bullying, as long as they pushing the buttons. Hypocritical fucks, every one.

 

[Zorro!]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

Big government! You guys just can't get a enough.

Suddenly the Lefties and the anti-Trumpers hate taxes? Too late!

Indeed it is. Trumpsters aren't conservatives, and they sure as hell aren't libertarians. They love big government bullying, as long as they pushing the buttons. Hypocritical fucks, every one.

Actually, this in response to bullying.

There is nothing Conservative or Libertarian about being passive in the face of bullying. Now one might choose to be passive, or one might bite down on their mouth piece and beat the living hell out of the bully, either response is acceptable to Conservatives or Libertarians. The conflict was instigated by the bully, not the respondent to the bullying.

It is the job of government to prevent a tragedy of the commons. That includes the commons of shared values and norms on which democracy depends. The dominant digital platform companies, including Facebook and Google, make their profits using business models that erode this commons. They have created a haven for dangerous misinformation and hate speech that has undermined trust in democratic institutions. And it is troubling when so much information is controlled by so few companies.

What is the best way to protect and restore this public commons? Most of the proposals to change platform companies rely on either antitrust law or regulatory action. This is a different solution. Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

I thought you Social Justice Warrior Types LOVED Taxes On Mega Rich Corporations, so why the long face?

 

[beagle9]

Mr President, please do something. Enough is enough.

this says it all:

"...................what Facebook has done isn’t just an attack on particular individuals or sources. ...........— this is an attack on the independent media as a whole. It’s an unprecedented tilting of the scales in favor of Democrat-approved media, and it will have an enormous impact on the 2020 election.

That’s the point of course. Since Trump won in 2016, Silicon Valley has been animated by a single mission — ensure it never happens again.

Beyond the leaks showing that Facebook is deliberately deboosting conservative figures (when it isn’t outright banning them), that YouTube and Google are pushing conservative content out of their top search results, just look at the video-recorded weeping of Google executives on stage after Trump won. They hate him, they hate his supporters, and they will do everything they can to suppress them before election day. The only question is, what’s Trump going to do about it? "

Bokhari: Link-banning Is Facebook's Terrifying New Censorship Tool | Breitbart

PROPOSAL: To Cut Facebook And Google Down To Size, Tax Targeted Digital Ads.

They are big Lefties,
Lefties LOVE Taxes!

Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

FAQs on Targeted Digital Ad Tax:

How high should the tax rates be?
High enough to change behavior.

Big government! You guys just can't get a enough.

Suddenly the Lefties and the anti-Trumpers hate taxes? Too late!

Indeed it is. Trumpsters aren't conservatives, and they sure as hell aren't libertarians. They love big government bullying, as long as they pushing the buttons. Hypocritical fucks, every one.

Actually, this in response to bullying.

There is nothing Conservative or Libertarian about being passive in the face of bullying. Now one might choose to be passive, or one might bite down on their mouth piece and beat the living hell out of the bully, either response is acceptable to Conservatives or Libertarians. The conflict was instigated by the bully, not the respondent to the bullying.

It is the job of government to prevent a tragedy of the commons. That includes the commons of shared values and norms on which democracy depends. The dominant digital platform companies, including Facebook and Google, make their profits using business models that erode this commons. They have created a haven for dangerous misinformation and hate speech that has undermined trust in democratic institutions. And it is troubling when so much information is controlled by so few companies.

What is the best way to protect and restore this public commons? Most of the proposals to change platform companies rely on either antitrust law or regulatory action. This is a different solution. Instead of banning the current business model — in which platform companies harvest user information to sell targeted digital ads — new legislation could establish a tax that would encourage platform companies to shift toward a healthier, more traditional model.

The tax would be applied to revenue from sales of targeted digital ads, which are the key to the operation of Facebook, Google and the like. At the federal level, Congress could add it as a surcharge to the corporate income tax. At the state level, a legislature could adopt it as a type of sales tax on the revenue a company collects for displaying ads to residents of the state.

I thought you Social Justice Warrior Types LOVED Taxes On Mega Rich Corporations, so why the long face?

They love attacking the rich players on the opposing team in which they are trying to strike out, uhh until their rich players are up to bat, then they try to poison the opposing teams pitcher with a compromised water carrier.

 

[Dekster]

Facebook announced Thursday that it has permanently banned a host of prominent figures it described as "dangerous" from its platform, including right-wing commentator and former Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

The platform said it has determined that those figures are "dangerous," and removed them under their policy barring individuals and groups that promote hateful and violent messages.

The tech giant, which has been engaged in an escalating crackdown on hate speech and fear-mongering on its platforms, also removed neo-Nazi Paul Nehlen, who previously ran for the House in Wisconsin, far-right activist Laura Loomer and conservative YouTuber Paul Joseph Watson.


Facebook bans Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones, other 'dangerous' figures

2019 will go down as the year where it tuned on Fox News, AM talk radio, and the fringe of social media.

My guess is that the Act Blue Army & Co. floods them with so many reports every time one of them posts, these sites are removing them just so the moderators have time to do other things.

 

[dblack]

It is the job of government to prevent a tragedy of the commons. That includes the commons of shared values and norms on which democracy depends. The dominant digital platform companies, including Facebook and Google, make their profits using business models that erode this commons. They have created a haven for dangerous misinformation and hate speech that has undermined trust in democratic institutions. And it is troubling when so much information is controlled by so few companies.

Yep. The same lame excuses the liberals use.

I thought you Social Justice Warrior Types LOVED Taxes On Mega Rich Corporations, so why the long face?

Because I'm not a social justice warrior. But you're aping them quite convincingly.

 

[skye]

And now Michelle Malkin has been censored too.

This has to stop... When enough is enough????????????? Please Mr President, please, do something!

And do something about Jack"The Ripper" Dorsey too....and Google and YouTube... It's about time Mr President!


One by one all Conservative voices are being taken away.







10 May 2019
Michelle Malkin Censored on Facebook for Opposing Censorship | Breitbart

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

the globohomos knocked out heartsite

 

[beagle9]

And now Michelle Malkin has been censored too.

This has to stop... When enough is enough????????????? Please Mr President, please, do something!

And do something about Jack"The Ripper" Dorsey too....and Google and YouTube... It's about time Mr President!


One by one all Conservative voices are being taken away.







10 May 2019
Michelle Malkin Censored on Facebook for Opposing Censorship | Breitbart

Hmmm, gonna have to take action in the form of litigating within the laws that were put in place concerning monopolies, anti-trust activities and other such activities I guess ??? Nothing wrong with being big in America, until that big is realized in a weaponized way by those entrusted to be big in America, where as the people who have been entrusted to operate as big, then attempts to turn that big into something bad be it politically, immorally, and unethically.

Highjacking huge platforms (even the federal government as a platform) in various way's, has become the operational method for various groups attempting to get their messages out in that form or that way.

They are experts in these things, and Mcarthy was absolutely right when he warned of these things, but this nation was already consumed with idiocy when his warnings came. Who we put in power is essential to stopping this stuff, and essential to us getting back to the America that had come together as American's over the years gone by.

The taking advantage of the freedom's we aspired to over the years, has indeed become a breach of trust issue now.

 

[skye]

FB, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Instagram.....they all behave in the same Fascist manner.

Enough is enough!

 

[beagle9]

FB, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Instagram.....they all behave in the same Fascist manner.

Enough is enough!

They, just like celebrities need to get out of politics quick fast and in a hurry. How foolish of them to be dragged into politics by those who have convinced them or highjacked them into doing such a thing.

Best to stay neutral if running a business outside of government control or best to keep the mouth shut if a celebrity who is free and operating outside of government control.

 

[Moonglow]

So many republican tears..