explosion at Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, UK

[depotoo]

It is wider spread, in my opinion than just Isis.
Here is another Imam from France that says most mosques import their Imams as they don't have to pay them, and that leads to radicalization many times-
The Imam Who Wants to Purge France's Mosques
There is another in Canada, which I can't remember his name or find right now.
Another moderate in the U.K. Was forced out, due to his more level headed views, -
A moderate imam has been forced to resign from his mosque after he was threatened with violence for joining anti-extremism group Quillam.
(Personally, even that group may be somewhat extreme, but less so than some others)
Read more: Moderate London imam 'forced to resign from his mosque for joining Qulliam' | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Moderate London imam 'forced to resign from his mosque for joining Qulliam' | Daily Mail Online

Another in the dfw area, where I am familiar with the extremist mosques that exist.

Irving imam, who has denounced extremism, threatened in ISIS videos | Social Justice | Dallas News
Problem is they seem to be the exception, rather than the rule. And each that comes forward ends up threatened.

Yep, coming to a town near you, if something isn't done-
Marawi: Isis rampage in Philippines continues with 19 civilians killed

The Philippines are under assault and now are suspending the rights of terrorists to get their country back, I hope it works, so many deaths.

And whose foreign policy is getting blamed for that, I wonder?

The Battle is Global...........Many countries in the fight...........From Australia to Timbuktu, Mali...........the fight goes on...........

ISIS has declared a Caliphate............and it continues

 

[Mindful]

Have we got something else to worry about?

Bin Laden’s son steps into father’s shoes as al-Qaeda attempts a comeback

 

[Dalia]

Pogo now accuses me of Bigotry..........because I dare to point out issues both over there and here.
Then gives an example of Blow Back by crazies of another group...........

Riddle me this..................

Westboro Baptist Church are quite frankly scum. They aren't Muslims but to me they are scum. Am I now a Bigot against the Baptist as well.................................

I point out those that are obviously radical........like those who march with signs saying Islam will Dominate and Freedom Go to Hell, but I can't identify a possible threat when seeing a freaking Nutcase................

Geesh.

According to the left, defending Westboro is bad and anti-American, but defending terrorists and terrorist sympathizers is pro-American.

Hating terrorists is now bigotry. We need to love and understand why they kill innocent people.

Once AGAIN you lying bucket of colostomy bag emptying, NOBODY "DEFENDED" ANY TERRORISTS. That's entirely *YOUR* lie that you pulled out of *YOUR* ass, which I've challenged you repeatedly to back up with any quote from anywhere, and you can't do it because you're a fucking lying wimp.

Yes but pogo it is also necessary to comdamn ( i can't find the word rejet ok ) strongly ... there is a sensation coming from the leftists of indifference with what happens with the terrorists as if the most important is to defend the Muslims .... but they are Muslims Which kill the Westerners you have to recognize it once and for all and stop insulting us is not us the bad guys it is the terrorist Muslims who kill us

 

[Dalia]

It's an answer, isn't it?
So before you put all of us Muslims in one basket

[/QUOTE]
Can you tell us something about the Manchester bombing ?[/QUOTE]

I can.

It was the first terrorist bombing there since the last one --- by the IRA.[/QUOTE]
Very Small answer ...[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
But how differentiated then? In France those who committed attacks you think they shouted on the roofs in Paris attention I am a terrorist? But no after the Paris attacks the families were surprised that their nice boy is a terrorist.

 

[basquebromance]

Hungary & Japan are paying the price for their racism. Zero terror attacks, no mass rapes & a strong unified culture. Who'd envy that?

 

[basquebromance]

Liberals have completely hijacked the word "love". It means nothing nowadays except opposition to the right and/or guilt-ridden capitulation.

 

[Issa]

Being to Japan or Hungary ?
Don't think so.

Hungary & Japan are paying the price for their racism. Zero terror attacks, no mass rapes & a strong unified culture. Who'd envy that?

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

 

[depotoo]

A mother-of-two who was seriously injured in the Manchester Arena attackfaces 12 months of surgery and treatment for her horrific injuries.

Joanne McSorley, a 43-year-old from Runcorn, was waiting in the foyer to collect her children when the deadly blast happened.

She suffered shrapnel injuries all over her body, the force of which broke both her arms and a leg.
Mum suffered horrific shrapnel injuries in the Manchester terror attack

 

[PoliticalChic]

From the same article, makes you wonder-

Lina Ahmed, 21, said: “They are a Libyan family and they have been acting strangely. A couple of months ago he [Salman] was chanting the first kalma [Islamic prayer] really loudly in the street. He was chanting in Arabic.

“He was saying ‘There is only one God and the prophet Mohammed is his messenger’.’

A family friend, who described the Abedis as “very religious”, said most of the family had returned to Libya, leaving only Salman and his older brother Ismail behind.

“They have not been there for quite a while. Different people come and go,” said Alan Kinsey, 52, a car-delivery driver who lives across the street. Mr Kinsey’s wife, Frances, 48, a care worker, said she believed that the parents had left before Christmas and just one or two young men had been living in the property.

-- And the Klan burns crosses too, but that doesn't make Jesus responsible for lynching black people.

Apparently there walk among us those who haven't yet got the word that individual people are responsible for their own actions.

Actions of the Klan were not individual actions, they're organized by Democrat party. Lynching laws were enforced in states run by the Democrats. When are they going to take responsibility for their actions?

And Democrats in Congress blocked every Republican anti-lynching law.

At the head of the 'blocking' was Democrat icon, Lyndon Johnson.

 

[Ame®icano]

From the same article, makes you wonder-

Lina Ahmed, 21, said: “They are a Libyan family and they have been acting strangely. A couple of months ago he [Salman] was chanting the first kalma [Islamic prayer] really loudly in the street. He was chanting in Arabic.

“He was saying ‘There is only one God and the prophet Mohammed is his messenger’.’

A family friend, who described the Abedis as “very religious”, said most of the family had returned to Libya, leaving only Salman and his older brother Ismail behind.

“They have not been there for quite a while. Different people come and go,” said Alan Kinsey, 52, a car-delivery driver who lives across the street. Mr Kinsey’s wife, Frances, 48, a care worker, said she believed that the parents had left before Christmas and just one or two young men had been living in the property.

-- And the Klan burns crosses too, but that doesn't make Jesus responsible for lynching black people.

Apparently there walk among us those who haven't yet got the word that individual people are responsible for their own actions.

Actions of the Klan were not individual actions, they're organized by Democrat party. Lynching laws were enforced in states run by the Democrats. When are they going to take responsibility for their actions?

And Democrats in Congress blocked every Republican anti-lynching law.

At the head of the 'blocking' was Democrat icon, Lyndon Johnson.

It goes way before him, FDR in order to get southern support for the ""New Deal" promised to block CRA, to have blacks excluded from most of programs and to block anti-lynching laws.

 

[beagle9]

From the same article, makes you wonder-

Lina Ahmed, 21, said: “They are a Libyan family and they have been acting strangely. A couple of months ago he [Salman] was chanting the first kalma [Islamic prayer] really loudly in the street. He was chanting in Arabic.

“He was saying ‘There is only one God and the prophet Mohammed is his messenger’.’

A family friend, who described the Abedis as “very religious”, said most of the family had returned to Libya, leaving only Salman and his older brother Ismail behind.

“They have not been there for quite a while. Different people come and go,” said Alan Kinsey, 52, a car-delivery driver who lives across the street. Mr Kinsey’s wife, Frances, 48, a care worker, said she believed that the parents had left before Christmas and just one or two young men had been living in the property.

-- And the Klan burns crosses too, but that doesn't make Jesus responsible for lynching black people.

Apparently there walk among us those who haven't yet got the word that individual people are responsible for their own actions.

Actions of the Klan were not individual actions, they're organized by Democrat party. Lynching laws were enforced in states run by the Democrats. When are they going to take responsibility for their actions?

And Democrats in Congress blocked every Republican anti-lynching law.

At the head of the 'blocking' was Democrat icon, Lyndon Johnson.

It goes way before him, FDR in order to get southern support for the ""New Deal" promised to block CRA, to have blacks excluded from most of programs and to block anti-lynching laws.

. The Democrats answer to this sort of talk, is that during those days white Democrats and white Republicans were racist as both were white skinned people period. So the liberals would say that the common thread between them all back then was an agreement on how blacks were viewed throughout the nation by many whites who at the time were taught to think in those ways whether they were repub or crat. Now over time the thinking changed, and many broke ranks with the sort of thinking that blacks should be held back or mistreated because of their cultural thinking and indifferences in which they held about themselves at various times in history. A racist these days can't be defined by any mainstream party or group as a whole, but instead they exist on all sides of the coin be it as in these splinter groups or lone wolves, infiltrators, underminers, and haters who ain't sure why they hate, but otherwise they just do . They can be black, white, yellow or whatever color they choose these days.

 

[Ame®icano]

The Democrats answer to this sort of talk, is that during those days white Democrats and white Republicans were racist as both were white skinned people period. So the liberals would say that the common thread between them all back then was an agreement on how blacks were viewed throughout the nation by many whites who at the time were taught to think in those ways whether they were repub or crat. Now over time the thinking changed, and many broke ranks with the sort of thinking that blacks should be held back or mistreated because of their cultural thinking and indifferences in which they held about themselves at various times in history. A racist these days can't be defined by any mainstream party or group as a whole, but instead they exist on all sides of the coin be it as in these splinter groups or lone wolves, infiltrators, underminers, and haters who ain't sure why they hate, but otherwise they just do . They can be black, white, yellow or whatever color they choose these days.

I disagree on the first part. Left is constantly trying to push the same narrative, repeating the same lie over an over and many people buys it over time. America is bad, Americans are bad. America had slavery...

Were there racists in the Republican party? Probably, but racists were most likely to be in Democrat party. Republican party was anti-slavery party. Period. Both, northern and southern Democrats supported slavery. It's no coincidence that since Lincoln, no Republican owned a slave. That means, at the time of Civil war, all the slaves in America, whole 4 million of them, were owned by Democrats.

After the Civil war, Democrats were in disarray, and in order to come back and appeal to white majority, they developed ideology that reincarnated from slavery. Ideology is called "white supremacy" and was unifying principle of Democrat party for whole generation after the Civil war that produced new institutions that were trademark of the Democrat party: segregation, KKK, racial terrorism, lynching.

Every single segregation law in the South, without exception was voted for by Democrat legislators, signed by the Democrat governor and executed by Democrat officials. The KKK was started by the delegate of the DNC, Nathan Bedford Forrest in Pulaski, TN. The KKK was shut down three years later by the Republicans, just to be revived in twentieth century by none other than progressive icon Woodrow Wilson, who by showing the movie "Birth of the nation" in the White House inspired KKK revival around the country. Since then, for the next thirty years, the KKK was domestic terrorist arm of the Democrat party (read Eric Foner, Columbia University).

Enough for now... only a question: Why would racists stick around in the party that is anti-slavery, anti-segregation, anti-lynch, anti-Jim Crow, and against racism, when they had another party that their whole existence was based on just that?

 

[basquebromance]

The U.K.'s welfare state funded the Manchester terrorist's terror attack.

Unreal: Manchester Bomber Used Taxpayer Money to Fund Terror, Telegraph Reports

 

[depotoo]

Interesting, terrorists being funded by the places they commit terror, from the telegraph-

One former detective said jihadists were enrolling on university courses to collect the student loans “often with no intention of turning up”.

Abedi was given at least £7,000 from the taxpayer-funded Student Loans Company after beginning a business administration degree at Salford University in October 2015.


It is thought he received a further £7,000 in the 2016 academic year even though by then he had already dropped out of the course. Salford University declined to say if it had informed the Student Loans Company that Abedi’s funding should have been stopped.

Separately, the Department for Work and Pensions refused to say if Abedi had received any benefits, including housing benefit and income support worth up to £250 a week, during 2015 and 2016. It would only say he was not claiming benefits in the weeks before the attack.

Abedi, 22, never held down a job, according to neighbours and friends, but was able to travel regularly between the UK and Libya.

Abedi also had sufficient funds to buy materials for his sophisticated bomb while living in a rented house in south Manchester.

Six weeks before the bombing Abedi rented a second property in a block of flats in Blackley eight miles from his home, paying £700 in cash.

He had enough money to rent a third property in the centre of Manchester from where he set off with a backpack containing the bomb.

Abedi also withdrew £250 in cash three days before the attack and transferred £2,500 to his younger brother Hashim in Libya, who is accused of knowing about the attack in advance.

The U.K.'s welfare state funded the Manchester terrorist's terror attack.

Unreal: Manchester Bomber Used Taxpayer Money to Fund Terror, Telegraph Reports

 

[basquebromance]

No terror attacks in Poland because the Polish government protects its people.

 

[Ame®icano]

* crickets *

 

[depotoo]

BREAKING: Police arrest man at Heathrow Airport in connection with Manchester bombing

The 38-year-old man, who has not been named by authorities, was wanted by police over an alleged connections to the ISIS suicide bomber Salman Abedi.

 

[eagle1462010]

BREAKING: Police arrest man at Heathrow Airport in connection with Manchester bombing

The 38-year-old man, who has not been named by authorities, was wanted by police over an alleged connections to the ISIS suicide bomber Salman Abedi.