Explain how this is an exoneration

[MAGAman]

I've given exact volume, page, and paragraph citations. You have yet to actually engage with any substance whatsoever. Use a napkin, would you?

What you have not given is a single example of Mueller saying that his 2 year investigation proved Trump committed a crime.

Because it doesn't exist.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

 

[bripat9643]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

Are these your other personalities? Or are you simply saying you didn't even bother to read your own link?

 

[WEATHER53]

Conspiracy section please
Muller has finished. That’s not a comfort producer for libbies but facts are facts. He will be doing no more work nor issuing any more reports. The over two year witch hunt resulted in no charges. Trump need not be declared innocent because no charges were filed. That’s how it works in USA and move elsewhere if you emotions demand elsewise.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

Are these your other personalities? Or are you simply saying you didn't even bother to read your own link?

Weak.

 

[sartre play]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

Okay, I’ll explain it for you:

If two years of FBI investigations and wire taps can’t provide any evidence of a crime, then that typically means the accused is exonerated, vindicated, and not going to be charged with anything.

You’re welcome.

Are you talking about Hillary?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The real stormy is a washed up whore. Why anyone would want to use her to represent them is a mystery. This fool is a hack with no integrity. He will say anything to defame Normals or to boost Stalinists.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.}

Stick to turning tricks.

 

[Markle]

Are these your other personalities? Or are you simply saying you didn't even bother to read your own link?

Step up! Prove, with a reliable source and working link proving that there was a crime committed. If you cannot, and you cannot quit childishly whining and calling name. Run along!

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Are these your other personalities? Or are you simply saying you didn't even bother to read your own link?

Step up! Prove, with a reliable source and working link proving that there was a crime committed. If you cannot, and you cannot quit childishly whining and calling name. Run along!

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

 

[Markle]

Are these your other personalities? Or are you simply saying you didn't even bother to read your own link?

Step up! Prove, with a reliable source and working link proving that there was a crime committed. If you cannot, and you cannot quit childishly whining and calling name. Run along!

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

NO COLLUSION!. Show us the crime. You cannot because there is none.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s easier to explain why it was never intended to be. Thread title is fake.

 

[iceberg]

Many of the responses here have been debunked by Mueller's public statements, and have since been replaced with the kettle logic that Mueller is corrupt and biased. Interesting how things turn on their insane heads so seamlessly.

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

did you read any more stories on that site? it's pretty inflammatory and certainly there to stir people up with national enquirer like zeal.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean the public statements Mueller later had to recant?

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

did you read any more stories on that site? it's pretty inflammatory and certainly there to stir people up with national enquirer like zeal.

No, I really didn't look at them. I already knew Mueller recanted his statements. It was reported all over the internet, but Stormy the idiot didn't know that because he only watched CNN.

 

[iceberg]

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

did you read any more stories on that site? it's pretty inflammatory and certainly there to stir people up with national enquirer like zeal.

No, I really didn't look at them. I already knew Mueller recanted his statements. It was reported all over the internet, but Stormy the idiot didn't know that because he only watched CNN.

well i looked and didn't see any major outlet report this. not saying it didn't happen but i will wait for more info.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

More fantasy than Game of Thrones.

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

did you read any more stories on that site? it's pretty inflammatory and certainly there to stir people up with national enquirer like zeal.

No, I really didn't look at them. I already knew Mueller recanted his statements. It was reported all over the internet, but Stormy the idiot didn't know that because he only watched CNN.

You claim Mueller recanted his statements from his press conference, but you're relying on an article that was about his press conference. The press conference can't be the basis for recanting the same thing.

 

[bripat9643]

Mueller BACKTRACKED Everything He Said In Yesterday's Statement On Obstruction In A Joint Statement With AG Bill Barr - Usa On

There's the proof that you're an imbecile.

The only thing that proves is that are easily duped by fake news.

did you read any more stories on that site? it's pretty inflammatory and certainly there to stir people up with national enquirer like zeal.

No, I really didn't look at them. I already knew Mueller recanted his statements. It was reported all over the internet, but Stormy the idiot didn't know that because he only watched CNN.

You claim Mueller recanted his statements from his press conference, but you're relying on an article that was about his press conference. The press conference can't be the basis for recanting the same thing.

How could an article about Mueller recanting what he said at his press conference not be about his press conference?

The inside of your skull must be the universes most perfect vacuum.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

How could an article about Mueller recanting what he said at his press conference not be about his press conference?

The headline is about Mueller recanting. The article simply drones on about Mueller's press conference and claims that he contradicted himself somewhere along the way...yet offers nothing to substantiate that claim. In fact, the closest the article comes is to claim that the press conference was inconsistent with what Barr claims Mueller said some time ago.

So your article doesn't even claim Mueller recanted his statements at his press conference. It would seem to imply that the press conference itself is the recantation of previous comments that were allegedly said in private. If you had a reading comprehension level above 1st grade you would already understand this.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

How could an article about Mueller recanting what he said at his press conference not be about his press conference?

The headline is about Mueller recanting. The article simply drones on about Mueller's press conference and claims that he contradicted himself somewhere along the way...yet offers nothing to substantiate that claim. In fact, the closest the article comes is to claim that the press conference was inconsistent with what Barr claims Mueller said some time ago.

So your article doesn't even claim Mueller recanted his statements at his press conference. It would seem to imply that the press conference itself is the recantation of previous comments that were allegedly said in private. If you had a reading comprehension level above 1st grade you would already understand this.

Tell you what. Seeing as you're a damn idiot who can't read worth a crap, let's use pretty pictures instead.