Explain how this is an exoneration

[iceberg]

just listen to how stupid we've become

I know.....right?
As if anyone listens to wtitten words.

speaking of how stupid we've become, their poster boy just checked in.

I'm sorry. Could you speak up? I missed that.

stupid people do miss the obvious.

move along now son.

Still can't hear you. Speak up, boy!

speaking of true morons...

 

[miketx]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

Your kind does not accept explanations.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

 

[iceberg]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

now - would you puill over for this? hell a yugo haulling a boat may beat this out.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

now - would you puill over for this? hell a yugo haulling a boat may beat this out.

Maybe they put a Hemi in it to fool people!

 

[iceberg]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

now - would you puill over for this? hell a yugo haulling a boat may beat this out.

Maybe they put a Hemi in it to fool people!

pretty sure a hemi would refuse to start in that thing.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

now - would you puill over for this? hell a yugo haulling a boat may beat this out.

Maybe they put a Hemi in it to fool people!

pretty sure a hemi would refuse to start in that thing.

You may well be right!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You....didn't bother to read it. It says it right there, in black and white. Page 1 of Volume II. Page 213 of the combined PDF.

Vol. 2???

You mean the CNN audition? The part that has ZERO legal weight and is little more than Torquemada crying that he couldn't GET the president as he was tasked by his democrat masters with doing?

Hey, you got completely destroyed by this, but the recounts and faithless electors will get him.

Wow, you're really butthurt by Mueller's report. In any event, your sad has-ing doesn't have anything to do with bripat's flagrantly false claim that the report doesn't say what it clearly says, exactly in the location that I've cited.

Well someone is butthurt alright, comrade.

I didn't read part 2 until this weekend, TALK ABOUT BUTT HURT... Fucking Torquemada who was careful to be "lawyerly" in part 1 instantly becomes a butthurt little partisan fuck. Like a Boxer who lost a fight screaming "No FAIR, I woooda one but he fought back."

But ignoring how CHILDISH Torquemada comes off, let's look about halfway down page 213, which you seem so invested in.

So Comrade, what DOES ;

"traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to
initiate or decline a prosecution"

mean to you Soros drones and to the hive? So Torquemada states that he DID IN FACT exonerate the president with the declination to prosecute, but that gives him a sadz, so he will just violate the law;

"but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment."

Well how about that? Fucking scofflaw decided not to follow "traditional" ie legal precedent.

ONLY problem is that he CAN'T, Torquemada has NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to levy false charges, despite how badly he wants to. See, Jeff Sessions is gone and Barr made it clear that if Mewler violated the law further, he would put Mewler in prison.

So the ONLY thing the corrupt little shit can do is whine.

A sitting president cannot be indicted, dope.

Therefore, there is no "traditional prosecution or declination decision" to be made.

The fact that there was not a declination decision made is in and of itself evidence that the investigators did indeed find evidence of criminality.

For get prosecution - you need evidence 1st. Mueller had none...not without that 'THOUGHT CRIMES' Bill the Democrats passed.

Read the report, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I know.....right?
As if anyone listens to wtitten words.

speaking of how stupid we've become, their poster boy just checked in.

I'm sorry. Could you speak up? I missed that.

stupid people do miss the obvious.

move along now son.

Still can't hear you. Speak up, boy!

speaking of true morons...

Shh.......listen closley.


Loser.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

It's all just political grandstanding and chest thumping. Nothing will come of it except for them to embarrass themselves with their ridiculous accusations.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

It's all just political grandstanding and chest thumping. Nothing will come of it except for them to embarrass themselves with their ridiculous accusations.

We'll see. If nothing comes of it, it sure won't be for a lack of trying.
.

 

[Aponi]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

now - would you puill over for this? hell a yugo haulling a boat may beat this out.

Seriously thats funny the firat time I saw one was in a movie but a police car pacer a good skate boarder or bicycle could smoke it

 

[Aponi]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exhonerates Donald?

because their party masters told them it did, and these sheep never disagree with their party masters.

You still driving the 1972 amc pacer with curb feelers pink paint job and white wall tires with the mirror tint and the bobble head bull dog on the dash with all of the gay pride stickers on it

Now, this is a Pacer...

we dont agree very often but i love your sense of humor you probally great to hang out with and have a couple beers with that was funny

 

[Aponi]

Im a car girl while I dont own a old car I do like them a lot.
When robert my live in and baby daddy moved in he decided to build bikes for us both and build a old 3 window coupe .I was supportive right away.he did all the work himself on thr bikes he built me a really cool 1200 sportster stock engine except for the air intake and balancing hes a areo space machinist.
Hes working on the coupe still its a hot rod not stock .
Old cars are cool even that pacer golf gator showed us.
Granded they were a joke stock but i saw a pinto one time with mustang running gear and a supercharger 411 gears it would gerk you neck back on a 1\8 mile red light to red ligt it was evil

 

[Uncensored2008]

A sitting president cannot be indicted, dope.

Yes, you are the 400th' Soros Drone to faithfully recite the hate site talking points.

That your hate point fails to in anyway address the question is lost on you.

Therefore, there is no "traditional prosecution or declination decision" to be made.

The fact that there was not a declination decision made is in and of itself evidence that the investigators did indeed find evidence of criminality.

Not what the scofflaw wrote. He declined to prosecute, he absolutely made that decision. You attempted to rewrite the report.

What Torquemada actually wrote was;

"but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment."

He didn't like the law, so he determined (decided) to violate it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Mueller report, Vol II, p2:

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.​

If there is a more tortured way of saying "Guilty as sin", I'd like to see it.

Of course, "exoneration" is the Trumpletons' unanimous conclusion. Good doggies...

NO COLLUSION!

'nuff said!

NO COLLUSION, and NO OBSTRUCTION.

The President of the United States had the legal and ETHICAL authority to fire the director of any executive agency he likes. The rehash of the Comey termination shows just how pathetic the Stalinists are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

The filthy democrats went after Trump for eating two scoops of ice cream with everything they had. They demanded he be impeached for eating fucking ice cream. The Stalinist thugs who are the democrats are dog shit, they have no legitimacy. That goes doubly for the filthy fucks who are the little Goebbels of the fascist press, enemies of the American people.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't understand how Trumpsters can call this a complete exoneration, and say it's over, when they know the Dems are going after elements of the report with everything that they have.

It's all just political grandstanding and chest thumping. Nothing will come of it except for them to embarrass themselves with their ridiculous accusations.

We'll see. If nothing comes of it, it sure won't be for a lack of trying.
.

Trying WHAT? Trying to be the most outrageous demagogue on CNN or MSNBC? That's what "grandstanding is."

These Stalinist fools have no intention of bringing actual impeachment articles. They just want to spew their bile on the hate stations.

 

[captkaos]

I see Stormy Daniels high tailed it out of here when I destroyed his/her/xir silly talking point on indictments.

Actually, you have yet to say anything on topic. You keep repeating the same rant that fails to answer the original question. How does any of these things Mueller is saying amount to an exoneration?

All the things he said amount to exoneration. You see when a Prosecutor doesn't prosecute that means the person is exonerated of wrongdoing. Unlike Mr. Bill " That little bitch dribbled on her dress" Clinton! Hillary was Very supportive of the Rape of Her husbands intern. Using promises , threats or coercion to obtain sexual favors is actually rape. She probably held Monica's head down