Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't know about elk, but here in Ohio we need more deer hunters. Not that the deer are doing damage, although they are, there are no natural predators. The die offs from starvation are increasing. The damage to other species is increasing. I'm amazed at the number of nature loving state employees that I know personally that are almost begging people to go hunt. I know a lot of hunters, one took 7 deer last year, and I'm not sure it was his limit. It's still not enough. The guy that shot 7 deer donated almost all of the meet to food banks. I figure he donated close $3000 worth of meat..7 billion people on the planet, massive pollution and global warming directly linked to human overpopulation , but we are alarmed when there are few hundred elk and we have to "cull" them, because of overpopulation...Um, excuse me?
I think he's trying to convince the pope that he should tell people to use birth control and stop having as many kids as possible.Vatican’s conferences on climate change was a current event.
Speaker tells Vatican conference: Reducing population is best solution to climate ‘crisis’
Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks
Is the pope for birth cotntrol?I think he's trying to convince the pope that he should tell people to use birth control and stop having as many kids as possible.Vatican’s conferences on climate change was a current event.
Speaker tells Vatican conference: Reducing population is best solution to climate ‘crisis’
I really doubt he's trying to convince the pope to murder
And yet reality says you're wrong. If you wish to decrease the birth rate in a population. increase their economic security. Look at Asia. The Chinese implemented a one child policy. It worked by force. Since then they have given up on that and their population has grown into middle class. Their population growth has followed. It's basically identical to western european rates. If you wish to lessen population rates give them electricity. The single thing that that raises people out of poverty.Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks
The difference is simple: anything that reduces the population and that isn't mass murder is "depopulation." One need only be patient and allow "survival of the fittest" to do what it does on an individual basis. How might one do that?
Pretty much any policy that doesn't have as an explicit aim of effecting a specific individual's or specific group's demise would count as "depopulation" rather than mass murder. It would because murder requires specific intent. Ancillary consequences and specific intent are not at all the same things.
- Deny health insurance coverage for a host of chronic and a handful of acute maladies.
- Eliminate various subsistence subsidies.
- Incite war.
- Enact birth limits and impose a heavy financial price on having more than X-many children such that mortality rates outstrip birth rates.
- Implement any other policy that allows mortality rates to outpace birth rates.
7 billion people on the planet, massive pollution and global warming directly linked to human overpopulation , but we are alarmed when there are few hundred elk and we have to "cull" them, because of overpopulation...Um, excuse me?
And yet reality says you're wrong. If you wish to decrease the birth rate in a population. increase their economic security. Look at Asia. The Chinese implemented a one child policy. It worked by force. Since then they have given up on that and their population has grown into middle class. Their population growth has followed. It's basically identical to western european rates. If you wish to lessen population rates give them electricity. The single thing that that raises people out of poverty.Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks
The difference is simple: anything that reduces the population and that isn't mass murder is "depopulation." One need only be patient and allow "survival of the fittest" to do what it does on an individual basis. How might one do that?
Pretty much any policy that doesn't have as an explicit aim of effecting a specific individual's or specific group's demise would count as "depopulation" rather than mass murder. It would because murder requires specific intent. Ancillary consequences and specific intent are not at all the same things.
- Deny health insurance coverage for a host of chronic and a handful of acute maladies.
- Eliminate various subsistence subsidies.
- Incite war.
- Enact birth limits and impose a heavy financial price on having more than X-many children such that mortality rates outstrip birth rates.
- Implement any other policy that allows mortality rates to outpace birth rates.
If you wish to decrease the birth rate in a population. increase their economic security.
Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks
The difference is simple: anything that reduces the population and that isn't mass murder is "depopulation." One need only be patient and allow "survival of the fittest" to do what it does on an individual basis. How might one do that?
Pretty much any policy that doesn't have as an explicit aim of effecting a specific individual's or specific group's demise would count as "depopulation" rather than mass murder. It would because murder requires specific intent. Ancillary consequences and specific intent are not at all the same things.
- Deny health insurance coverage for a host of chronic and a handful of acute maladies.
- Eliminate various subsistence subsidies.
- Incite war.
- Enact birth limits and impose a heavy financial price on having more than X-many children such that mortality rates outstrip birth rates.
- Implement any other policy that allows mortality rates to outpace birth rates.
Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks
The difference is simple: anything that reduces the population and that isn't mass murder is "depopulation." One need only be patient and allow "survival of the fittest" to do what it does on an individual basis. How might one do that?
Pretty much any policy that doesn't have as an explicit aim of effecting a specific individual's or specific group's demise would count as "depopulation" rather than mass murder. It would because murder requires specific intent. Ancillary consequences and specific intent are not at all the same things.
- Deny health insurance coverage for a host of chronic and a handful of acute maladies.
- Eliminate various subsistence subsidies.
- Incite war.
- Enact birth limits and impose a heavy financial price on having more than X-many children such that mortality rates outstrip birth rates.
- Implement any other policy that allows mortality rates to outpace birth rates.
I didn't ask the question; I just exhibited the respect of giving a reasonably thoughtful and direct answer to it rather than deflecting by attacking the question or the person who posed it.Solutions without a problem.
