Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
Take your meds and sleep this one off, gramps. I already posted the proof that reveals you're fucking nuts.The old fool is batshit senile.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
Ad Hom does little to cover the fact that you are once again lying, Fawn.
Popsnapplecrack was told to pound sand by everyone in the campaign. You lying won't alter that.
Patience, Mueller is not done toying with trump.Just checking...Is Trump in prison yet because according to the OP...
Revenge is a dish best served COLD
View attachment 158289
LOLOLNo stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.
Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
You're such an idiot, it's actually amusing.
I just posted the contents of an email from a senior Trump campaign official, encouraging Papadopoulos to meet with Russians and you're still exhibiting such immense abject ignorance, you're just not capable of comprehending.
That's ok, Shortbus, you're special, I understand.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused.
This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.
Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
Yes, they have. All of it is fact. D Jr admitted his part, and the Greek pled guilty for his. None of your crybabying has any bearing on any of it. I suspect that you think it does.
What part did he "admit" Herr Goebbels?
[
"False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused."
No, true. He was a Trump campaign official, and they have his intent and attempts on the record. Those are now facts entered into the record. Session rebuking him in one meeting doesn't make it go away, especially when the same report you rely on for that assertion tells us Trump would not rule the idea out.
"This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way."
haha, I look forward to that claim being made in a court of law. You're holding an empty bag, there. The law is not going to hold Trump accountable for even what his closest people did. And you think you will bring charges against Hillary or Obama, even further removed from that activity? You are delusional. That's nothing but a bunch of cackling and squawking from you.
And, no, engaging in quid pro quo with known Russian spies is not "entirely different". Not in any universe.
No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.
Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
Yes, they have. All of it is fact. D Jr admitted his part, and the Greek pled guilty for his. None of your crybabying has any bearing on any of it. I suspect that you think it does.
What part did he "admit" Herr Goebbels?
He admitted his attempt to collude with Russians do get dirt on Hillary. that's a fact. Now, whether or not that's illegal or good is a different discussion. But that's a fact not up for debate. Of course, the only reason you are targeting that academic debate to muddy the waters is because you don't want to have the debate on whether it is legal or good.
So you attack known facts, instead of putting on your big boy pants and wading into the debate of the legal, ethical, and moral value of the known facts. You are feeding on the pond scum, intellectually.
[
"False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused."
No, true. He was a Trump campaign official, and they have his intent and attempts on the record. Those are now facts entered into the record. Session rebuking him in one meeting doesn't make it go away, especially when the same report you rely on for that assertion tells us Trump would not rule the idea out.
Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?
Oh wait, you're just lying - Communist!
"This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way."
haha, I look forward to that claim being made in a court of law. You're holding an empty bag, there. The law is not going to hold Trump accountable for even what his closest people did. And you think you will bring charges against Hillary or Obama, even further removed from that activity? You are delusional. That's nothing but a bunch of cackling and squawking from you.
And, no, engaging in quid pro quo with known Russian spies is not "entirely different". Not in any universe.
You DO grasp that Loretta Lynch is not running the Justice department?
We have evidence (proof really) the the corrupt FBI paid a foreign spy to disrupt and corrupt a presidential election on behalf of Obama and Clinton. That's treason - by Obama and Comey.
You're too fucking stupid to grasp it, and you depend on your filthy party being immune to the law, but this one will not go well for you Bolsheviks.
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.
Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
Yes, they have. All of it is fact. D Jr admitted his part, and the Greek pled guilty for his. None of your crybabying has any bearing on any of it. I suspect that you think it does.
What part did he "admit" Herr Goebbels?
He admitted his attempt to collude with Russians do get dirt on Hillary. that's a fact. Now, whether or not that's illegal or good is a different discussion. But that's a fact not up for debate. Of course, the only reason you are targeting that academic debate to muddy the waters is because you don't want to have the debate on whether it is legal or good.
So you attack known facts, instead of putting on your big boy pants and wading into the debate of the legal, ethical, and moral value of the known facts. You are feeding on the pond scum, intellectually.
No, you're just flat out lying.
Come back when you are willing to deal in facts, Comrade.
Imbecile... they have email from high ranking campaign officials trying to encourage that low level Trump campaign advisor to meet with Russians.No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?His emails to high level campaign officials who were encouraging him to meet with Russians say otherwise, sycophant.
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused.
This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way.
LOLOLTake your meds and sleep this one off, gramps. I already posted the proof that reveals you're fucking nuts.The old fool is batshit senile.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
Ad Hom does little to cover the fact that you are once again lying, Fawn.
Popsnapplecrack was told to pound sand by everyone in the campaign. You lying won't alter that.
More ad hom. still zero fact from you Fawn.
{A Washington research firm paid a former British spy’s company $168,000 for work on a dossier outlining Russian financial and personal links to Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign, the U.S. firm said in a statement on Wednesday.
Although it was public knowledge that Fusion GPS paid for the work, the amount had not been disclosed. Fusion GPS hired former MI6 officer Christopher Steele to collect information about Trump and his advisers.
Fusion GPS’ statement said it had told Congress about how $168,000 was paid last year to Orbis Business Intelligence, Steele’s company.
The money paid to Orbis was taken from $1.02 million it received in fees and expenses from the Perkins Coie law firm, the statement said. The law firm represented the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign} - Hillary Admits to Paying For the Russian Dossier
But do keep lying through your fucking teeth Herr Goebbels, it's bound to alter reality, if you just hate enough....
No, but the link I gave to Papadopoulos’ indictment is evidence.Again, gramps, I already posted the evidence. Everyone here now gets to see just how crazy you are for not understanding that.No, I admit you're insane.Senile old kook ... too bad you made a fool of yourself with that one instead of reading my next post which included a link confirming what I said.
So, you admit that you're lying and have nothing, Comrade?
You admit that logical fallacy is as close to logic as you ever get.
You never enter into the same universe as fact.
Try again, Herr Goebbles.
Spewing hatred and cartoons is not "evidence" Herr Goebbels.
You're a demagogue and a pathological liar, with literally nothing to base your idiocy on.
Mueller? A DNC operative???Patience, Mueller is not done toying with trump.Just checking...Is Trump in prison yet because according to the OP...
Revenge is a dish best served COLD
View attachment 158289
So Mueller is a DNC operative seeking revenge for Hillary losing?
For the first time, I do agree with you....
The, I hate Hiilary and can’t get over her thread, is down yonder—>So Hills gets paid and then pays for written propaganda while a low level Trump guy talks shit and Trump is in trouble??
[
"False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused."
No, true. He was a Trump campaign official, and they have his intent and attempts on the record. Those are now facts entered into the record. Session rebuking him in one meeting doesn't make it go away, especially when the same report you rely on for that assertion tells us Trump would not rule the idea out.
Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?
Oh wait, you're just lying - Communist!
"This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way."
haha, I look forward to that claim being made in a court of law. You're holding an empty bag, there. The law is not going to hold Trump accountable for even what his closest people did. And you think you will bring charges against Hillary or Obama, even further removed from that activity? You are delusional. That's nothing but a bunch of cackling and squawking from you.
And, no, engaging in quid pro quo with known Russian spies is not "entirely different". Not in any universe.
You DO grasp that Loretta Lynch is not running the Justice department?
We have evidence (proof really) the the corrupt FBI paid a foreign spy to disrupt and corrupt a presidential election on behalf of Obama and Clinton. That's treason - by Obama and Comey.
You're too fucking stupid to grasp it, and you depend on your filthy party being immune to the law, but this one will not go well for you Bolsheviks.
"Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?"
That is, of course, where the idea of "quid pro quo" comes into play. There are ways of compensating people that don't involve currency.
"You're too fucking stupid to grasp it"
Hmm, no, I think I probably accurately predicted what our predictable justice system would do. Again, Trump would not be held accountable, by the law, for the actions of even his closest advisers. The idea that Clinton or Obama would get indicted over anything having to do with Uranium One or the dossier is complete delusion. That's a fact, regardless of our politics or superstitions.
In other words, even if EVERY made-up factoid about Uranium One floating around were true, you would still be wrong. Do you get that?
The same goes for the dossier.... out of one side of your neck you make fun of Mueller for looking at the coffee-boy. Then, out of the other side of your neck, you would try to pin the actions of a legal firm hired by the DNC on Clinton or Obama? You cannot be serious. The people pushing this narrative are paid liars preying on you.
They have proven no such thing, you intellectually challenged nitwit. The rest of what you have to say can therefor be ignored.
Does every snowflake in here start out every post with a blantant lie?
Yes, they have. All of it is fact. D Jr admitted his part, and the Greek pled guilty for his. None of your crybabying has any bearing on any of it. I suspect that you think it does.
What part did he "admit" Herr Goebbels?
He admitted his attempt to collude with Russians do get dirt on Hillary. that's a fact. Now, whether or not that's illegal or good is a different discussion. But that's a fact not up for debate. Of course, the only reason you are targeting that academic debate to muddy the waters is because you don't want to have the debate on whether it is legal or good.
So you attack known facts, instead of putting on your big boy pants and wading into the debate of the legal, ethical, and moral value of the known facts. You are feeding on the pond scum, intellectually.
No, you're just flat out lying.
Come back when you are willing to deal in facts, Comrade.
"No, you're just flat out lying."
You mean, Mueller is lying, and Dickhead Junior was lying. Go to the sources, tough guy. Go on, say it. Mueller is lying, the Greek is lying, they're all lying. All except the Donald, who would never tell a lie. Go on, say it! Be yourself, little peacock!!
Imbecile... they have email from high ranking campaign officials trying to encourage that low level Trump campaign advisor to meet with Russians.No stupid, even Manafort refused to entertain Popenfresh's overtures to the Russians.They weren't rebuked, they were subpoenaed.The emails that were soundly rebuked, Fawn?
{
Real collusion might be in the significant share of U.S. uranium sold to the Russians during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state (she signed off on the deal), followed by a $500,000 fee paid to her husband for a speech in Moscow and the millions of dollars that subsequently flowed into the Clinton Foundation from uranium investors.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress should investigate that Russian connection, along with the role of the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign (and the earlier Republican role) in creating an anti-Trump dossier that has been shown to be a fraud and yet was used to justify the appointment of Mueller. If the reason for Mueller's appointment is fraudulent, how can it be said that his investigation, which includes staff attorneys who made donations to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is not tainted?
Among the many problems with this investigation is that it has no legal, subject or monetary limits. If Mueller and his associates are unable to prove collusion with the Russians, one can count on them coming up with something else. Far-left members of Congress, such as Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), openly state that their objective is to "take out" the president, and they don't mean to lunch.
There is also the matter of leaks from the grand jury. Not surprisingly, the details of the indictments matched the leak to CNN. Unless that network employs mind readers and engages in paranormal activity, those leaks are felonies and the leakers should be prosecuted.}
Indictments and Ham Sandwiches
You dont seem to be following. They have already proven the intent and attempts of Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russians. What is left now is to show this was not limited to just Dickhead Junior and The Greek, but also involved the head of the campaign. And then there's the little matter of whether ot not Trump himself was either aware of or complicit in these efforts.
Geesh man, pick up a newspaper once in a while...
False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused.
This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way.
You’re really crazy.
[
"False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused."
No, true. He was a Trump campaign official, and they have his intent and attempts on the record. Those are now facts entered into the record. Session rebuking him in one meeting doesn't make it go away, especially when the same report you rely on for that assertion tells us Trump would not rule the idea out.
Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?
Oh wait, you're just lying - Communist!
"This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way."
haha, I look forward to that claim being made in a court of law. You're holding an empty bag, there. The law is not going to hold Trump accountable for even what his closest people did. And you think you will bring charges against Hillary or Obama, even further removed from that activity? You are delusional. That's nothing but a bunch of cackling and squawking from you.
And, no, engaging in quid pro quo with known Russian spies is not "entirely different". Not in any universe.
You DO grasp that Loretta Lynch is not running the Justice department?
We have evidence (proof really) the the corrupt FBI paid a foreign spy to disrupt and corrupt a presidential election on behalf of Obama and Clinton. That's treason - by Obama and Comey.
You're too fucking stupid to grasp it, and you depend on your filthy party being immune to the law, but this one will not go well for you Bolsheviks.
"Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?"
That is, of course, where the idea of "quid pro quo" comes into play. There are ways of compensating people that don't involve currency.
"You're too fucking stupid to grasp it"
Hmm, no, I think I probably accurately predicted what our predictable justice system would do. Again, Trump would not be held accountable, by the law, for the actions of even his closest advisers. The idea that Clinton or Obama would get indicted over anything having to do with Uranium One or the dossier is complete delusion. That's a fact, regardless of our politics or superstitions.
In other words, even if EVERY made-up factoid about Uranium One floating around were true, you would still be wrong. Do you get that?
The same goes for the dossier.... out of one side of your neck you make fun of Mueller for looking at the coffee-boy. Then, out of the other side of your neck, you would try to pin the actions of a legal firm hired by the DNC on Clinton or Obama? You cannot be serious. The people pushing this narrative are paid liars preying on you.
What did Trump gain. Herr Goebbels?
You don't even have good lies.
Fucking Communists, too stupid to fabricate something remotely plausible.
What did he gain???[
"False, they have a low level, unpaid volunteer who suggested meetings that were refused."
No, true. He was a Trump campaign official, and they have his intent and attempts on the record. Those are now facts entered into the record. Session rebuking him in one meeting doesn't make it go away, especially when the same report you rely on for that assertion tells us Trump would not rule the idea out.
Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?
Oh wait, you're just lying - Communist!
"This is entirely different than hiring a foreign spy to work with the Kremlin to fabricate smears as Hillary and Obama did, with the FBI tossing bribes to the foreign operative to corrupt out elections along the way."
haha, I look forward to that claim being made in a court of law. You're holding an empty bag, there. The law is not going to hold Trump accountable for even what his closest people did. And you think you will bring charges against Hillary or Obama, even further removed from that activity? You are delusional. That's nothing but a bunch of cackling and squawking from you.
And, no, engaging in quid pro quo with known Russian spies is not "entirely different". Not in any universe.
You DO grasp that Loretta Lynch is not running the Justice department?
We have evidence (proof really) the the corrupt FBI paid a foreign spy to disrupt and corrupt a presidential election on behalf of Obama and Clinton. That's treason - by Obama and Comey.
You're too fucking stupid to grasp it, and you depend on your filthy party being immune to the law, but this one will not go well for you Bolsheviks.
"Really? What was the salary of Popadoofulus, Herr Goebbels?"
That is, of course, where the idea of "quid pro quo" comes into play. There are ways of compensating people that don't involve currency.
"You're too fucking stupid to grasp it"
Hmm, no, I think I probably accurately predicted what our predictable justice system would do. Again, Trump would not be held accountable, by the law, for the actions of even his closest advisers. The idea that Clinton or Obama would get indicted over anything having to do with Uranium One or the dossier is complete delusion. That's a fact, regardless of our politics or superstitions.
In other words, even if EVERY made-up factoid about Uranium One floating around were true, you would still be wrong. Do you get that?
The same goes for the dossier.... out of one side of your neck you make fun of Mueller for looking at the coffee-boy. Then, out of the other side of your neck, you would try to pin the actions of a legal firm hired by the DNC on Clinton or Obama? You cannot be serious. The people pushing this narrative are paid liars preying on you.
What did Trump gain. Herr Goebbels?
You don't even have good lies.
Fucking Communists, too stupid to fabricate something remotely plausible.
