Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What blows me away is the overlooked fact of how many people it would have taken to pull off a conspiracy of this size and yet, so far, nobody has talked. In this day and age of public confession, 24 hr news cycles and everybody wanting their 15 minutes a confession of this magnitude would be just too delicious to resist. I may not know too much about demolitions and explosives but I DO know people.
I agree with you, but I take it one step further. How are you going to get that many people together willing to commit mass murder on a massive scale without anyone blowing the whistle beforehand? Remember, the initial estimates of the people killed was in excess of 10,000 and up to 25,000. The people involved had to know they were dealing with the possibility of that many deaths.
Oh, it's fun for the truthtards to pretend people, especially anyone working for the government, are automatically that evil and will willingly kill people for money or for country. Yet nobody can point out to anyone who suddenly got really rich really quick, and people who are rabid about a cause often times become disillusioned over time. We won't even get into the fact that many of the people in the "standard" conspiracy theories wouldn't be government workers at all.
In summary, a conspiracy of this size would never get off the ground without someone leaking what was about to happen prior to 9/11. And, like you correctly pointed out, a conspiracy of this size wouldn't last much past the first couple months before someone came forward and announced their part in the attack and how it was a conspiracy. Surely they could arrange for immunity for their part in bringing down the "bigger fish" in the conspiracy.
There are only two possible ways that explosives can be used to collapse a building.
Method A (Direct Demolition): requires positioning a massive charge at one side of the base to blow out one side of the foundation causing the building to topple. This method was employed in an attempt to topple a World Trade Center tower in March, 1993, by Ramseh Yousef, and it would have worked if his explosive charge had been positioned in a different (higher) level of the basement parking garage. This method of collapsing a structure is easiest and least costly in terms of materials and human effort but the reason it isn't used in populated areas is obvious.
Method B (Controlled Demolition): requires the strategic positioning of measured explosive charges throughout the structure and wiring them to detonate in precisely timed intervals. The objective of this method, which is comparatively costly and time-consuming, is to effect an implosion of the structure's walls thus producing a totally vertical collapse rather than lateral toppling, which would be catastrophic in a populated area.
Bottom Line: Having learned their mistake from Ramseh Yousef's failed 1993 attempt to topple a WTC tower, if Al Qaeda chose to attack the World Trade Center with explosives logic dictates they would have employed Method A, because direct demolition would have toppled the buildings causing exponentially greater damage in the surrounding areas.
Those who have stubbornly adhered to the theory that the World Trade Center towers were brought down by controlled demolition should ask themselves why the attackers would have chosen to minimize rather than optimize damage to New York City?
The controlled demolition theory simply makes no sense.
Because the truthtards don't believe Al Qaeda was involved, or if they were, they were working under orders of our government. Apparently our government has no problem killing thousands, but has a hard time toppling buildings. Then again, why bother to fly a plane into a building. Imagine the terror of just blowing the buildings with no warning! One minute the towers are there, next thing you know they're gone along with everyone in them!
But like you accurately stated, the truthtard theories simply make no sense.
What blows me away is the overlooked fact of how many people it would have taken to pull off a conspiracy of this size and yet, so far, nobody has talked. In this day and age of public confession, 24 hr news cycles and everybody wanting their 15 minutes a confession of this magnitude would be just too delicious to resist. I may not know too much about demolitions and explosives but I DO know people.
When will they ever understand conspiracy theories are not proof of other conspiracy theories and that opinions are not evidence? It is utterly retarded!
And just how many Al Qaeda "terrorists" do you all think it took, to do this attack? Anyone care to guess? I mean it was a very sophisticated operation after all.
I would bet less than 30 knew the entire plan. Maybe 50 or 60 involved at some level.
And that's an average of 59 that couldn't kep their mouths shut.
It took 20 Al-Qaeda members. Hijackers with boxcutters, and the master of evil doers himself, Osama Bin Laden, to carry out their mission. Bin Laden was in his "underground super complex bunker". Complete with munitions, an HVAC system and a total global terror cell control room.
Remeber Rumsfeld's big talk on TV about the underground complex?
Are you familiar with compartmentalization?
Do you really think that anyone who has the ability to confess anything would do so? Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle such a confession?
Look at the Roswell scenario. All of those military personnel were told to keep there mouth shut, and they did. Upon retiring and turning 85 years old, suddenly a few of those soldiers spill the beans about what they saw, what they were told and the ramifications of not following orders..
This will all come out one day. probably in another 40 years when it makes absolutely no difference. Just like the gulf of Tonkin and a host of other crimes.
One of my favorite theorys, of course, is the Kennedy assassination second, third and 4th gunman postulatons. And trust me, the conspiracy theories started THE NEXT DAY. To date, even with a supposed death bed confession from Santos Traficanti (?), ( 'we should have taken Bobby out') the theory has never been proven. Lets just stick to one ct at a time. You can't prove one ct by raising the spectre of another one. I take it this subject occupies a lot of your time, huh?
Ah but I just pass on what the real whistle blowers have made known publicly already, and that is why there are plants, possibly like you to try and deal with forums posters like me and the others.Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle you? Why would they let pissants like you get close to uncovering the "truth" when they could just "stifle" you?
Another good point. What makes Jones think a nobody like himself would be allowed to run his mouth if he were actually on to something? Granted there are evil things going on in the world but 911 being an inside job isn't one of them. Sorry.
Here is a simple comprehensive example that depicts how the NIST investigation went when Bush appointed his personal friend to head the NIST Report and collapse investigation.
The Administration specifically instructed him to NOT look at the possibility in explosives in the collapses....even though there are countless witnesses live on the news who heard many explosions.
Ah but I just pass on what the real whistle blowers have made known publicly already, and that is why there are plants, possibly like you to try and deal with forums posters like me and the others.Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle you? Why would they let pissants like you get close to uncovering the "truth" when they could just "stifle" you?
Another good point. What makes Jones think a nobody like himself would be allowed to run his mouth if he were actually on to something? Granted there are evil things going on in the world but 911 being an inside job isn't one of them. Sorry.
That might work DURING the attack, but after the attack, everyone involved would know their part and would have talked. After all, they would have been fooled, and not knowingly part of the attack.Are you familiar with compartmentalization?
Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle you? Why would they let pissants like you get close to uncovering the "truth" when they could just "stifle" you?
I love it when truthtards try to justify one conspiracy theory by bringing up other conspiracy theories as though they are fact!
There was no crime in the Gulf of Tonkin. More lies from you. Were we attacked? Absolutely. North Vietnam has freely admitted they attacked and suffered a defeat. Did the ship involved think they were attacked AGAIN? Absolutely. Were they? No. Did they know that at the time? No. It only came out after everything was analized. By that time LBJ had already addressed Congress.TakeAStepBack said:This will all come out one day. probably in another 40 years when it makes absolutely no difference. Just like the gulf of Tonkin and a host of other crimes.
As I mentioned earlier, it's a pathology. 'Conspiracy theories are the last refuge of the powerless mind. It gives the individual a feeling of control in an uncontrollable world. Let them have their little plots and covert midnight meetings, trench coats and secret docs only THEY are privy to. Without those things they are nothing.'
Are you familiar with compartmentalization?
Do you really think that anyone who has the ability to confess anything would do so? Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle such a confession?
Look at the Roswell scenario. All of those military personnel were told to keep there mouth shut, and they did. Upon retiring and turning 85 years old, suddenly a few of those soldiers spill the beans about what they saw, what they were told and the ramifications of not following orders..
This will all come out one day. probably in another 40 years when it makes absolutely no difference. Just like the gulf of Tonkin and a host of other crimes.
One of my favorite theorys, of course, is the Kennedy assassination second, third and 4th gunman postulatons. And trust me, the conspiracy theories started THE NEXT DAY. To date, even with a supposed death bed confession from Santos Traficanti (?), ( 'we should have taken Bobby out') the theory has never been proven. Lets just stick to one ct at a time. You can't prove one ct by raising the spectre of another one. I take it this subject occupies a lot of your time, huh?
I wasn't attempting to prove another "conspiracy theory" by bringing up Roswell. What i WAS attempting to do, was show how easy it is to keep people's mouths shut.
The diffeerence between the events of 9/11 and "conspiracy theories" is that we have this thing here us humans use called science. But i digress, as I stated above, it makes no difference.
I do enjoy talking hypothesis as to what really happened that day, as my line of work happens to fall in direct line of structure. So it's of importance when there is a bald faced lie being perpetuated onto my science. BTW, my colleagues and I agree on most the points I bring up here. They simply keep it moving while I continue to question. If even half of the docile population would question things once in a while and become active, this type of shit wouldn't happen in the first place.
First of all, the entire governments version IS a conspiracy theory, complete with your secret meetings, and little plots, and secret docs, so (using your link-less quote), it is provided by them to give YOU a feeling of control, in an uncontrollable world. Those who actually are brave enough to look deeper into their conspiracy, are of stronger mind and intestinal fortitude, who aren't afraid of finding what you, who actually are the ones who have the 'powerless mind", are too brainwashed or scared to face.
You lack the will to research, and admit to yourself that this attack was not done by Al-Qaeda, alone, to actually think so is really quite naive.
Keep it up, Jones! I am laughing my ass off here!One of my favorite theorys, of course, is the Kennedy assassination second, third and 4th gunman postulatons. And trust me, the conspiracy theories started THE NEXT DAY. To date, even with a supposed death bed confession from Santos Traficanti (?), ( 'we should have taken Bobby out') the theory has never been proven. Lets just stick to one ct at a time. You can't prove one ct by raising the spectre of another one. I take it this subject occupies a lot of your time, huh?
I wasn't attempting to prove another "conspiracy theory" by bringing up Roswell. What i WAS attempting to do, was show how easy it is to keep people's mouths shut.
The diffeerence between the events of 9/11 and "conspiracy theories" is that we have this thing here us humans use called science. But i digress, as I stated above, it makes no difference.
I do enjoy talking hypothesis as to what really happened that day, as my line of work happens to fall in direct line of structure. So it's of importance when there is a bald faced lie being perpetuated onto my science. BTW, my colleagues and I agree on most the points I bring up here. They simply keep it moving while I continue to question. If even half of the docile population would question things once in a while and become active, this type of shit wouldn't happen in the first place.
What happened that day was a bunch of dingbat radical muslum retards, egged on by their equally radical dopey leader flew planes into buildings and blew them and several thousand good people to smithereens. The main reason being we didn't give Bin Laudin his fair share of credit for Afghanistan in the 80's and he felt miffed.
You go ahead and believe that.
Keep pretending you're not reading this. This is fun!
That might work DURING the attack, but after the attack, everyone involved would know their part and would have talked. After all, they would have been fooled, and not knowingly part of the attack.
Do you have any idea how easy it would be for the powers that be to stifle you? Why would they let pissants like you get close to uncovering the "truth" when they could just "stifle" you?
I love it when truthtards try to justify one conspiracy theory by bringing up other conspiracy theories as though they are fact!
There was no crime in the Gulf of Tonkin. More lies from you. Were we attacked? Absolutely. North Vietnam has freely admitted they attacked and suffered a defeat. Did the ship involved think they were attacked AGAIN? Absolutely. Were they? No. Did they know that at the time? No. It only came out after everything was analized. By that time LBJ had already addressed Congress.
As I mentioned earlier, it's a pathology. 'Conspiracy theories are the last refuge of the powerless mind. It gives the individual a feeling of control in an uncontrollable world. Let them have their little plots and covert midnight meetings, trench coats and secret docs only THEY are privy to. Without those things they are nothing.'
First of all, the entire governments version IS a conspiracy theory, complete with your secret meetings, and little plots, and secret docs, so (using your link-less quote), it is provided by them to give YOU a feeling of control, in an uncontrollable world. Those who actually are brave enough to look deeper into their conspiracy, are of stronger mind and intestinal fortitude, who aren't afraid of finding what you, who actually are the ones who have the 'powerless mind", are too brainwashed or scared to face.
You lack the will to research, and admit to yourself that this attack was not done by Al-Qaeda, alone, to actually think so is really quite naive.
Talking about yourself again? You should have more self esteem than that! We all know you only go off conspiracy sites that are known liars themselves. Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step!I was spot on with this one, a really really naive, and brainwashed stooge.
You mean like you actively trying to betray this great nation through sedition? Why is it when someone stands up for the truth, you sick fucks pretend they are a traitor?Mr. Jones said:You can tell this one also isn't here to discuss this out of concern for its nation, responds without showing any interest or rational about what was linked to it...
Kicked your ass is what Candyslice did! Exposed your retarded theories for what they are; the silly rantings of infantile children.Mr. Jones said:You really should educate yourself on the topic that you clearly show no knowledge about before coming here and making an utter fool of yourself.
More senseless babblings from someone trying to come to grips with how big a loser he is that he has to pretend conspiracies are real just to give his pathetic life some kind of meaning.Mr. Jones said:The problem is a bunch of dingbats in this nation are so far gone in their ability to think for themselves, and realize what is being done to others in their name, and to themselves and families and children, while being robbed of their finances and liberties, that it is impossible for them to resist the tyranny being imposed on them..they don't even realize what is happening to them.
Candyslice has. You haven't. That is proven every time you post.Mr. Jones said:Again please research the topic, the search function is your friend, as the many links provided to you as a courtesy.
I wasn't attempting to prove another "conspiracy theory" by bringing up Roswell. What i WAS attempting to do, was show how easy it is to keep people's mouths shut.
The diffeerence between the events of 9/11 and "conspiracy theories" is that we have this thing here us humans use called science. But i digress, as I stated above, it makes no difference.
I do enjoy talking hypothesis as to what really happened that day, as my line of work happens to fall in direct line of structure. So it's of importance when there is a bald faced lie being perpetuated onto my science. BTW, my colleagues and I agree on most the points I bring up here. They simply keep it moving while I continue to question. If even half of the docile population would question things once in a while and become active, this type of shit wouldn't happen in the first place.
What happened that day was a bunch of dingbat radical muslum retards, egged on by their equally radical dopey leader flew planes into buildings and blew them and several thousand good people to smithereens. The main reason being we didn't give Bin Laudin his fair share of credit for Afghanistan in the 80's and he felt miffed.
I was spot on with this one, a really really naive, and brainwashed stooge. You can tell this one also isn't here to discuss this out of concern for its nation, responds without showing any interest or rational about what was linked to it...
You really should educate yourself on the topic that you clearly show no knowledge about before coming here and making an utter fool of yourself.
The problem is a bunch of dingbats in this nation are so far gone in their ability to think for themselves, and realize what is being done to others in their name, and to themselves and families and children, while being robbed of their finances and liberties, that it is impossible
for them to resist the tyranny being imposed on them..they don't even realize what is happening to them.
Again please research the topic, the search function is your friend, as the many links provided to you as a courtesy.
