Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by creativedreams, Dec 2, 2009.

  1. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

    EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of dust BEFORE it even hits the ground.

    If everything WASN'T exploded into dust then the rubble pile of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero would have been HUGE and MUCH HIGHER than it was.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2009
  2. Zoom-boing
    Offline

    Zoom-boing Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    21,261
    Thanks Received:
    6,378
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    East Japip
    Ratings:
    +6,675
    No they're not.
     
  3. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    62,069
    Thanks Received:
    9,119
    Trophy Points:
    423
    Ratings:
    +9,122
    Name names, give us the details or stfu!
     
  4. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    Listen to the Narrators Contents:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nc5_5IJek8"]YouTube- 9/11 WTC North Tower Exploding[/ame]

    These buildings didn't collapse symetrically and concentrically at almost freefall speeds.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  5. Zoom-boing
    Offline

    Zoom-boing Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    21,261
    Thanks Received:
    6,378
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    East Japip
    Ratings:
    +6,675
    Willow, he did in another post. He said 'a lot' of people and 'more than a handful' of people believe that 9/11 was an inside job. There's yer proof!
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2009
  6. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    This is NOT a simple collapsing building from fire and damage.

    Something is clearly blowing all the vertical structure out of the way.

    Even a Physicist that worked for NASA for almost 30yrs said:... "seeing the huge pyroclastic cloud of pulverized concrete dust and the massive structural members being hurled horizontally leaves no doubt in my mind the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by explosives."


    Seven Senior Federal Engineers say Explosives Used on World Trade Centers:
    Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9-11 Investigation

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2009
  7. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    If it was just a normal collapse without explosives pulverizing and spreading everything out before it hit the ground then the rubble pile would have been MUCH higher.
     
  8. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    HOLY COW!!!!!!!!!!!

    I HAVE CHILLS RUNNING DOWN MY SPINE!!!!!!!!!

    In the last few minutes he portrays absolute proof of how it works and how easy Media control is that sways the emotions of the masses...

    WTF!!!!!!!!!!!

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db2te1u8Dgs"]YouTube- World Trade Center Building 7 - The Evidence - Read notes ►[/ame]
     
  9. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    Why would NIST try to forensically analyse collapse without the building plans? NO where in their product does it say they had plans.

    Why would NY state courts let guiliani steel the NYC building plans when NIST needed them for engineering analysis? They ignored federal and state freedom of information laws.

    Why would thousands of tons of steel(evidence) go to India and China when the US steel industry needs the steel?
     
  10. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,159
    Thanks Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Timbucktwo
    Ratings:
    +26
    Questioning and asking for a new investigation into 9/11 is the MOST patriotic thing to do for fellow American citizens and government alike.

    What is so wrong with a new and independent investigation?

    Follow the money trail to the debunking propaganda on TV and Popular Mechanics.

    Why is there a propaganda campaign to try and sway votes against asking for a new investigation instead of just having one?

    EVERY American deserves clarity and closure on 9/11 and NOT a sneaky and secretive government approach.
     

Share This Page