Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

Nov 15, 2009
1,165
28
71
Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of dust BEFORE it even hits the ground.

If everything WASN'T exploded into dust then the rubble pile of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero would have been HUGE and MUCH HIGHER than it was.

wtcsmoke.jpg


site1103.jpg


fig-5-14.jpg
 
Last edited:
Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of dust BEFORE it even hits the ground.

If everything WASN'T exploded into dust then the rubble pile of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero would have been HUGE and MUCH HIGHER than it was.

wtcsmoke.jpg


site1103.jpg


fig-5-14.jpg

Name names, give us the details or stfu!
 
Listen to the Narrators Contents:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nc5_5IJek8"]YouTube- 9/11 WTC North Tower Exploding[/ame]

These buildings didn't collapse symetrically and concentrically at almost freefall speeds.

Alfred_P._Murrah_Federal_Building_.jpg


Building-Damage-by-Earthquakes.jpg


STRUCTURE004.jpg


madrid_fire_small_collapse.jpg



capt.jj81202130836.spain_building_fire_jj812.jpg
 
Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of dust BEFORE it even hits the ground.

If everything WASN'T exploded into dust then the rubble pile of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero would have been HUGE and MUCH HIGHER than it was.

Name names, give us the details or stfu!

Willow, he did in another post. He said 'a lot' of people and 'more than a handful' of people believe that 9/11 was an inside job. There's yer proof!
 
Last edited:
This is NOT a simple collapsing building from fire and damage.

Something is clearly blowing all the vertical structure out of the way.

Even a Physicist that worked for NASA for almost 30yrs said:... "seeing the huge pyroclastic cloud of pulverized concrete dust and the massive structural members being hurled horizontally leaves no doubt in my mind the World Trade Center buildings were brought down by explosives."


Seven Senior Federal Engineers say Explosives Used on World Trade Centers:
Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9-11 Investigation

2.jpg


2.jpg
 
Last edited:
If it was just a normal collapse without explosives pulverizing and spreading everything out before it hit the ground then the rubble pile would have been MUCH higher.
 
HOLY COW!!!!!!!!!!!

I HAVE CHILLS RUNNING DOWN MY SPINE!!!!!!!!!

In the last few minutes he portrays absolute proof of how it works and how easy Media control is that sways the emotions of the masses...

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db2te1u8Dgs"]YouTube- World Trade Center Building 7 - The Evidence - Read notes ►[/ame]
 
Why would NIST try to forensically analyse collapse without the building plans? NO where in their product does it say they had plans.

Why would NY state courts let guiliani steel the NYC building plans when NIST needed them for engineering analysis? They ignored federal and state freedom of information laws.

Why would thousands of tons of steel(evidence) go to India and China when the US steel industry needs the steel?
 
Questioning and asking for a new investigation into 9/11 is the MOST patriotic thing to do for fellow American citizens and government alike.

What is so wrong with a new and independent investigation?

Follow the money trail to the debunking propaganda on TV and Popular Mechanics.

Why is there a propaganda campaign to try and sway votes against asking for a new investigation instead of just having one?

EVERY American deserves clarity and closure on 9/11 and NOT a sneaky and secretive government approach.
 
There are decisions made all the time as to picking and chosing battles with estimates on the amount of life lost in soldiers and collateral damage.

Loss of life either military or civilian is just a numbers game when it comes to war and world strategies.

9/11 may be just a case of sacrificing a pawn for a strategic square on the world's chessboard.
 
Tom Leppert the CEO for Turner Construction which did many months of construction renovation work on the World Trade Center buildings up to the very day of 9/11 went on to be appointed by George Bush to the President's Commission on White House Fellows.
Turner Construction Company
[url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/fellows/about/commission.html]White House Fellowships: Commission Members[/URL]

Turner Construction worked hand and hand with Controlled Demolition Inc(CDI) on many demolition projects.

Look at the website for Controlled Demolition Inc and it states right in there that part of their work includes "classified" work for the U.S. Department of Defense on sensitive projects both domestically and internationally.
Controlled Demolition, Inc. | Government

Turner Construction Company AND Controlled Demolition Inc BOTH helped performed clean-up at ground zero in which all the steel (evidence) got shipped overseas mostly to China, except for a few hand picked pieces to be sent to NIST for inspection and for part of a memorial ship.

Turner Construction had a main office located in the third sub-basement of Tower 1. Turner Construction had been performing construction renovation work in various parts throughout the WTC centers and had occupied various office spaces.

A WTC property assessment described some of the renovations as work upon steel support columns within and around elevator shafts of both WTC Towers.

Turner Construction also constructed the new headquarters for the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) which manages a laboratory for energetics, explosive materials, propellents, etc and the only reliable source of aluminum nano-powders(nano-thermite) in the United States.
http://manganaro.com/projbovt.html
 
Renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?

I found this article in the archives of USA Today......Here is a direct quote from the article:

"Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach."

Here is the USA Todays link to the article from its archives.

USATODAY.com - Pentagon repairs to cost $700 million

Renovations to strengthen the Pentagon and they ONLY do the part of the building that is involved in the 9/11 incident?
 
The THREE World Trade Center buildings fell only a few seconds slower than a ball would have if dropped from the tops of the buildings.

This is why MANY physicists around the world are saying it leaves almost NO room in the equation for any structural resistance of the many vertical steel support columns.

This is why MANY physicists around the world are saying the NIST Report that explained the building collapses literally re-writes physics.

The NIST Report was headed by Bush's personal friend Frank Gayle and had many engineers telling Frank it was wrong before he even released it. The Administration has refused to allow NIST to look at the possibility of explosives used to remove the support columns symetrically and concentrically to allow the collapse speeds to be had.

fig5-1.jpg


wtc-7.gif



solomon2.gif


Collapse of Building #7 compared to controlled demolition
wtc7vsdemo2mb2.gif


Collapse of Building #7 compared to controlled demolition
a39ae149b0f6.gif
 
Last edited:
Here is a simple comprehensive example that depicts how the NIST investigation went when Bush appointed his personal friend to head the NIST Report and collapse investigation.

The Administration specifically instructed him to NOT look at the possibility in explosives in the collapses....even though there are countless witnesses live on the news who heard many explosions.

PoliticalvsScientificmethod.jpg


xxsdwqdeded3weds231eyjiu.jpg


bubbler.jpg
 
EVERY picture of Ground Zero where the Twin Towers stood is evidence of explosives being used in the fact that almost NOTHING is left but a sea of steel.........and this happened before it even hits the ground!

Look at this picture below.....EVERYTHING except the steel was EXPLODED into pulverized dust before it even hit the ground and settled in a thick layer of dust throughout the city.



WTCinHell.jpg
 
Even in this live video right after the collapses there is NOTHING left but the steel and EVERYTHING including the steel rod reinforced concrete exploded into dust.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaNHuwGAG1I"]YouTube- 9/11: WTC Building 7 WILL COLLAPSE reports ABC News, Before It Happened[/ame]
 
Even the Governor makes a statement about how he is baffled about how there is NO CONCRETE...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDuBi8KyOhw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDuBi8KyOhw[/ame]
 
My new favorite video:

Architect Richard Gage slams the 9/11 debunking director...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbrs4N7FXoo"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbrs4N7FXoo[/ame]
 
Every picture of "Ground Zero" is evidence of explosives used.

EVERYTHING but the steel was exploded into a huge pyroclastic cloud of dust BEFORE it even hits the ground.

If everything WASN'T exploded into dust then the rubble pile of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero would have been HUGE and MUCH HIGHER than it was.

you have us all convinced you are a complete moron. pyroclastic clouds come from volcanoes. are you now claiming a volcano caused the WTC collapse?

nothing was exploded. there are no explosives. the only evidence you have shown us is that you dont have a fucking clue what you are talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top