- Thread starter
- #201
As far as euthanasia goes, you're all living in the past.Ever hear of the Nazis?
They had consensus.
Wise up.
WTFFFF???
Do you think the Jews in the camps CONSENTED to that treatment?
let me repeat
WTFFFFFFFFFF???
That's why the forces had to use FORCE
because what they were doing was COERCION not CONSENSUS
You argue that Obama's idea of consensus is coercion too!
That is NOT consensus! You know this! WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF.....
The people who lived in the towns next to the concentration camps were fine with it.This is why they were forced to march through when the camps were liberated. The consensus of the German people was that the concentration camps were okay.
Oh, yeah, because you and yours will be the first people EVER to do it right!
You betcha.
BTW, euthanasia of mentally ill subjects, mentally retarded people, physically defective or ill people has already been applied..and it is ALWAYS a revolting mess. And every one of the people that try to pass it off as the *civilized* and *kind* thing to do...were either lying about their intent, or unable to keep it from being anything except a morass of human rights violations, abuse, torture and murder...that ultimately the people who were complicit in were tried and found guilty for.
In the progressive Utopia of the Netherlands, they admittedly killed off a bunch of people without actually having their consent, and they admittedly have all sorts of violations of every ethical code known to man in the application of their wonderful "legal kill off" laws.
Keep in mind, the Netherlands is home to some of the best racist pukes ever born!
And predecessors of the same ilk had a fine ol' time with eugenics.
Some things never change.