Who came to the rescue of Mike Johnson yesterday?You're wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who came to the rescue of Mike Johnson yesterday?You're wrong
Who came to the rescue of Mike Johnson yesterday?
The fucking DEMOCRATS rescued Johnson.People who aren't crazy and can do math.
Not being able to do math, is a hug problem for conservatives
The fucking DEMOCRATS rescued Johnson.
The "two parties" is a pro rasslin' kayfabe act.
Nanski Pigloski didn't have any trouble at all governing with only a couple votes more than the "opposition"....But Johnson is the weakest piece of impotent shit since Boehner.....And you wonder why guys like me dropped out?I'm aware it was the fucking Democrats.
The Republicans think that 2% can govern the rest, if they just want it enough.
You don't participate anyway, so....
Nanski Pigloski didn't have any trouble at all governing with only a couple votes more than the "opposition"....But Johnson is the weakest piece of impotent shit since Boehner.....And you wonder why guys like me dropped out?
Who came to the rescue of Mike Johnson yesterday?
She governed because she had a spine....Something that hasn't been seen in the GOP in my lifetime.Nancy could govern because her guys like you don't drop out.
Which pretty much underscores that the "two party" system is a fraud....My point in the first place.You assume that I like you, are contained in that binary box. I'm not. I am a Conservative who is not represented in our system. The system is rigged, not in a right left paradigm, it's not real. They give us two false choices. I can tell you where to find, I can tell you that it was written by a Progressive but that won't matter. You are just too damn lazy to see it for yourself.
She governed because she had a spine....Something that hasn't been seen in the GOP in my lifetime.
You don't have a "second party"...You have a bunch of backstabbing collaborators, who drum out anyone who puts up any real opposition.There is 1 party that will stick together no matter what.
You have a second party who have a dozen knuckle heads in The Housewho can't get along with anyone.
Democrats understand who their enemy is
You don't have a "second party"...You have a bunch of backstabbing collaborators, who drum out anyone who puts up any real opposition.
The same math that Piglosi had when she ran the HoR like a dragon woman.We've circled back to people who can do math.
You said this:
I'm looking for specific examples of ranked choice voting doing away with the lesser of two evils.
Maybe we should clarify terms. By lesser-of-two-evils I mean the voting strategy where a voter votes for a candidate they don't necessarily like to block another candidate they really can't stand.
That doesn't work with ranked choice voting. In RCV, the way to block a candidate is simply to rank them dead last. You're essentially voting for "anybody but". But you're still free to rank your actual favorite first, without worrying about their chances.
It's sounds like you're looking for specific results or something, but I never made any claims in that regard.
One man, 1.79247524 votes.So instead of voting for the one lesser of 2 evils, you simply shift to the two lesser of three evils.
This article is spot on. We've got to wake up and stop falling for the charade of two-party politics.
Isn't that pretty much where we're headed?