Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I warned folk that this was coming.
Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.
If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.
That's the future.
I warned folk that this was coming.
Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.
If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.
That's the future.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/alimony-for-your-eggs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
I love feminists, they claim they want equality when al lthey seek out are special privileges. Pathetic.
Legal experts like Kevin Noble Maillard of Syracuse University speculate that a womans missed opportunities to have a baby during a marriage could be viewed as a form of sacrifice for which she should be compensated (in much the same way that a woman who put her husband through law school could expect to be compensated if he divorced her just before he reaped the financial rewards of the degree). And it helps rectify one of lifes greatest biological injustices: that men but not women can typically start a family well into middle age and beyond.
yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage
and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit
You can still be robbed blind, even if you don't marry.
Do not accept mail in your girlfriends name at your address.
One LORD P, we shall call him.
Actually the son of LORD P, a hereditary peer in the UK, lived in a home that had been in his family for 5 centuries.
He had a girlfriend of 6 weeks who slept over a couple or 3 nights a week.
Once she had a new cell phone mailed to her at his home.
That established residency and cohabitation.
Under law there's was suddenly a marriage under common law.
Rob got home from work one day( Rob/Robin, the lords son), he was a social worker, his clients were very young criminals, most famously the two lads who killed Jamie Bulger.
He was locked out, the locks changed.
It got to court, he was offered the option of buying the home back from her at a cost of millions or allowing her to keep it..
Social workers tend not to have millions.
She took the house.
Last I remember, she was during him for help paying the property tax!!
Don't know how that ended up!!
The same lunacy has started here, it's only a matter of time!!
yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage
and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit
yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage
and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit
Exactly.
The greedy women/feminazis could always just marry each other.
yet one more deterrent from entering the marriage
and then the stupid greedy women will complain in their letters to the magazines - men don't want to commit
You can still be robbed blind, even if you don't marry.
Do not accept mail in your girlfriends name at your address.
One LORD P, we shall call him.
Actually the son of LORD P, a hereditary peer in the UK, lived in a home that had been in his family for 5 centuries.
He had a girlfriend of 6 weeks who slept over a couple or 3 nights a week.
Once she had a new cell phone mailed to her at his home.
That established residency and cohabitation.
Under law there's was suddenly a marriage under common law.
Rob got home from work one day( Rob/Robin, the lords son), he was a social worker, his clients were very young criminals, most famously the two lads who killed Jamie Bulger.
He was locked out, the locks changed.
It got to court, he was offered the option of buying the home back from her at a cost of millions or allowing her to keep it..
Social workers tend not to have millions.
She took the house.
Last I remember, she was during him for help paying the property tax!!
Don't know how that ended up!!
The same lunacy has started here, it's only a matter of time!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/opinion/alimony-for-your-eggs.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
I love feminists, they claim they want equality when al lthey seek out are special privileges. Pathetic.
I warned folk that this was coming.
Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.
If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.
That's the future.
I warned folk that this was coming.
Next step will be assigning fault in divorce cases.
Like they did in the UK.
If a man cheated, he was at fault, a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Probably be criminalized into the bargain.
If a woman cheated, it could only be because her husband was at fault because he was such a bad husband and therefore an unfit father.
He would be ordered to hand over his house, savings, custody of his kids and pension.
Visits to his kids would be supervised by a social worker( paid for out of dads pocket).
Any physical contact between father and child would be challenged as suspicious.
That's the future.
UK?
It was much the same in Australia [little UK, used to be].
But, bianco-ilk put a stop to it, demanded equal rights for men, and got them.
Mind you, 'people' are trying to blame White heterosexual males for everything they perceive to be wrong in Australia...and the world.
Translated as " Let's deny this as loud as possible, people always listen to the loudest person"!
All fact.
The Lord Priors son, Robin.
Lots of woman haters here..mostly they pretend to be straights, too.
I think they're not.
Where is the hatred of women, idiot?
None.
Pointing out the stupidity of an insane court case is not hatred of women.
Recognizing that racism cuts both ways is not racist
Being a liberal is fanaticism.
