Emerging Consensus that LBJ Killed JFK?

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,090
2,250
Sin City
By Jeff Lukens, [American vet who lives in Fla] Monday, March 31, 2014

The JFK Assassination is, by far, the biggest cover-up in American History

More than a thousand of books have been written on the John F. Kennedy assassination, yet there remains much controversy as to what happened that day in Dallas. To the casual observer, the Warren Commission’s narrative of three shots in six seconds by a lone gunman may appear to be plausible. Search a bit below the surface, however, and you find many inconsistencies that call into question the entire story.

Well, it makes a lot more sense than the Mafia killing him. And, LBJ makes a sensible target – especially as he ain't around any more. Read the story @ Emerging Consensus that LBJ Killed JFK? :eusa_whistle:
 
You might want to pm your little troll buddy the kid who fantasizes about wishing he could have been in vietnam and to have been a soldier then,nam vet kid and let him be aware of this.He believes in fairy tales though,him being the kid that fantasizes and everything,which is why he lives in the fantasy world that Oswald was the lone assassin.:D:lol::lol::lol:

oh and you might actually run these pesky little facts by him as well while your at it although Im pretty positive it will do no good since he goes into debates only seeing what he WANTS to see.denying these real life facts that prove there was a conspiracy.:cuckoo:

1.all the dallas doctors said the wound in the back of the head was an EXIT wound.If he was actually a nam vet like he claims,he would know this fact to be true,that the exit wound of a bullet is much larger than an entrance wound and he only had a small tiny entrance wound in the forehead.proof he is not the namvet he CLAIMS he is.:cuckoo::lol:His whole face was intact which would be impossible if shot from behind.

2.that the laws of physics were violated that day.,that your head doesnt go violaently back and to the left if shot from behind,that it goes forward.:cuckoo::lol::lol::lol:

3.that several witnesses saw a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle. -a diversion to get everybodys attention away from Greer.that was for his benefit when he comes on here trolling and ready for some more ass beatings like he gets here everyday on this.:D

4.that the warren commission members altered witness testimonys -a crime itself they should have all gone to jail for.

5.that the secret service violated all protocals that day and were not held accountable for their actions.no firings,NOTHING.

your little troll boy friend though never has any answers ofr these pesky little facts though claiming they are not true.:cuckoo:

claiming the autopsy photos were never altered or the zapruder film was not tampered with even though the best photography experts around the world have said so. none of those facts are ever good enough for your little boy.experts beliefs mean nothing to him.Only what the CIA controlled media that he worships is good enough for him,what they say.:cuckoo:

oh and he as well ignores the title of this thread that even the government concluded in the1970's that the warren commission was wrong,that there was a second shooter involved,one behind the fence.

He claims they never said that of course or that the lead investigater of that committte robert blakey wrote a book about it saying there was a conspiracy by the mob to kill him. he never reads these links here.:cuckoo:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-70-s-there-was-a-conspiracy-to-kill-jfk.html

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291[/ame]

oh and since you are such a huge fan of paid disinformation agent trolls who defend the lies of the government like gomer pyle ollie,you should add dawgshit,rat in the ass,,rockwell,and freewill to your friends list as well.

and FINALLY,you COULD have gone back through the archives and looked at some of the other threads in the past before you made this thread.Its not like you are the only one in the past who ever made this thread you know.:cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
I started posting this over three years ago. His left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence and replaced with video fakery. In other words, they (THE GOVERNMENT EDITORS) were required to make it look like he shot jfk, but provided some excuses for people not to believe it. Greer's arm extention refutes those excuses completely.

jfk assassination films-orville nix - Video Dailymotion

Advance to 1:09 for the close-up. Robert Groden narrarates but ignores Greer's left arm movement and focuses on the headshot.

I started looking at the Zapruder film in 7-09 and it went from there. I got the closeup of Greer's arm going over in 9-2010. That's what's made it factual. I paid a guy a whopping thirty dollars to enhance it. Once that was clear this case was closed for everyone willing to look past all the nonsense that came before it. If Greer's left arm really moved back toward JFK just the way it appears to in Zapruder, then he was definitely the shooter. They apparently had to create a cartoon of Greer shooting jfk, which is quite comical to say the least.

jfk__GIFSoupcom.gif

mormal_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

fake-reflection_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
 
Here's the now infamous wink, back and to LBJ's right, just before being sworn in. The man to the left in the bowtie is Congressman Albert Thomas, winking at LBJ.

 
You might want to pm your little troll buddy the kid who fantasizes about wishing he could have been in vietnam and to have been a soldier then,nam vet kid and let him be aware of this.He believes in fairy tales though,him being the kid that fantasizes and everything,which is why he lives in the fantasy world that Oswald was the lone assassin.:D:lol::lol::lol:

oh and you might actually run these pesky little facts by him as well while your at it although Im pretty positive it will do no good since he goes into debates only seeing what he WANTS to see.denying these real life facts that prove there was a conspiracy.:cuckoo:

1.all the dallas doctors said the wound in the back of the head was an EXIT wound.If he was actually a nam vet like he claims,he would know this fact to be true,that the exit wound of a bullet is much larger than an entrance wound and he only had a small tiny entrance wound in the forehead.proof he is not the namvet he CLAIMS he is.:cuckoo::lol:His whole face was intact which would be impossible if shot from behind.

2.that the laws of physics were violated that day.,that your head doesnt go violaently back and to the left if shot from behind,that it goes forward.:cuckoo::lol::lol::lol:

3.that several witnesses saw a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle. -a diversion to get everybodys attention away from Greer.that was for his benefit when he comes on here trolling and ready for some more ass beatings like he gets here everyday on this.:D

4.that the warren commission members altered witness testimonys -a crime itself they should have all gone to jail for.

5.that the secret service violated all protocals that day and were not held accountable for their actions.no firings,NOTHING.

your little troll boy friend though never has any answers ofr these pesky little facts though claiming they are not true.:cuckoo:

claiming the autopsy photos were never altered or the zapruder film was not tampered with even though the best photography experts around the world have said so. none of those facts are ever good enough for your little boy.experts beliefs mean nothing to him.Only what the CIA controlled media that he worships is good enough for him,what they say.:cuckoo:

oh and he as well ignores the title of this thread that even the government concluded in the1970's that the warren commission was wrong,that there was a second shooter involved,one behind the fence.

He claims they never said that of course or that the lead investigater of that committte robert blakey wrote a book about it saying there was a conspiracy by the mob to kill him. he never reads these links here.:cuckoo:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-70-s-there-was-a-conspiracy-to-kill-jfk.html

The Plot to Kill the President: George Robert Blakey: 9780812909296: Amazon.com: Books

oh and since you are such a huge fan of paid disinformation agent trolls who defend the lies of the government like gomer pyle ollie,you should add dawgshit,rat in the ass,,rockwell,and freewill to your friends list as well.

and FINALLY,you COULD have gone back through the archives and looked at some of the other threads in the past before you made this thread.Its not like you are the only one in the past who ever made this thread you know.:cuckoo:


oh and since were talking about LBJ'S involvment here.Nixon and Bush sr were involved up to their ears in it as well.Nixon,JOhnson,and Hoover were all long time pals who all hated kennedy.johnson and nixon were backed by big oil,they had a friendship that dated back to the late forties their time in the senate together.

Nixon,Johnson,and Bush were all major planners in the assassination.this video below has a lot of information on all that and a lot of it was taken from russ bakers book Family of secrets detailing Bushs involvement in it.Johnson was friends it turns out with Bushs father Prescott Bush who had stong connections to the CIA as well as his son.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSakrYOpJ5s]JFK 2: The Bush Connection [newer release] - YouTube[/ame]
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLhAmBOpEhc]Bankers kill! JFK murdered by the Private Banking Cartels - YouTube[/ame]
 
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfpO-WBz_mw#t=2865"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfpO-WBz_mw#t=2865[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top