Zone1 Elon to Sue the ADL for Damages

[Tommy Tainant]

Here comes the anti-semites.

They are never far away.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Wow. It's almost ALWAYS the ADL whimpering about others and what they "say." It's about time the table is turned.

I think they would welcome the action. It would be a disaster for musk.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

With that type of attitude, I have no issue with Elong moving his space technologies to another nation. Let them rule the new frontier. Anyway, Joe does not want us to.

A personal attack on our President, lamely disguised as an argument about space tech?

 

[theHawk]

Here comes the anti-semites.

Who is anti-Semitic?

 

[ActionJackson]

Who is anti-Semitic?

According to the Demwits, if you criticize George Soros, you're an evil anti-Semite. They're idiots.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Elon Musk threatens to sue Anti-Defamation League over lost X revenue

World’s richest man claims civil rights group has falsely accused site formerly known as Twitter of being antisemitic

www.theguardian.com

Apparently they have affected advertising revenue by pointing out the surge in anti semitism on his free speech platform. I think this might be a difficult case for Musk to make.
Most people who threaten legal action tend to drop the threat once given advice. Musk can obviously afford a legal case but does he want all of the extremist crap on twitter aired before a jury ?
Perhaps he is just hoping to silence the good folk at ADL ?

No surprise, a subject/slave of a degenerate shithole of a nation that doesn't recognize such basic human rights as freedom of speech, has no clue about this right as understood by those of us who have it, and the limitations thereof.

In the UK, you can be arrested and jailed just for saying something that the government doesn't like. Here in the US, you can only be prosecuted for speech, after the fact if you say something that is untrue, and one who claims to have been harmed for that untruth sues. “Prior restraint” on speech is prohibited here in the US.

 

[Synthaholic]

He won't sue. This is just more Elon bullshit. A lawsuit would open him up to discovery, and that's the last thing he wants.

Once again, I'm brilliant. Posted an hour ago:

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Elon Muskâs hypocrisy about free speech hits a new low | Margaret Sullivan

It’s ‘free speech for me, but not for thee’ in his world – he doesn’t like it, he sues

www.theguardian.com

Yes it looks like the "free speech absolutist" is also sueing another organisation for saying mean things about him.

Maybe he should get his saudi friends to chop their hands off ?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Elon Muskâs hypocrisy about free speech hits a new low | Margaret Sullivan

It’s ‘free speech for me, but not for thee’ in his world – he doesn’t like it, he sues

www.theguardian.com

Yes it looks like the "free speech absolutist" is also sueing another organisation for saying mean things about him.
Maybe he should get his saudi friends to chop their hands off ?

The article perfectly exemplifies the specifically-British ignorance of, and contempt for free speech.

A few days ago, he threatened to sue the Anti-Defamation League – for defamation, no less – blaming the non-profit for driving billions of dollars in advertising from his company. The ADL has criticized Twitter for failing to take action against hate speech, charging that fewer than a third of posts flagged for antisemitic content were removed or sanctioned; and it joined other civil rights groups last year in calling for advertiser boycotts.​

See the bolded part? It was the ADL that was demanding censorship of legitimate free speech, and when it didn't get its way, it slandered and attacked the platform for refusing to engage in such censorship; allegedly leading to tangible financial losses on the part of that platform.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The article perfectly exemplifies the specifically-British ignorance of, and contempt for free speech.

A few days ago, he threatened to sue the Anti-Defamation League – for defamation, no less – blaming the non-profit for driving billions of dollars in advertising from his company. The ADL has criticized Twitter for failing to take action against hate speech, charging that fewer than a third of posts flagged for antisemitic content were removed or sanctioned; and it joined other civil rights groups last year in calling for advertiser boycotts.​

See the bolded part? It was the ADL that was demanding censorship of legitimate free speech, and when it didn't get its way, it slandered and attacked the platform for refusing to engage in such censorship; allegedly leading to tangible financial losses on the part of that platform.

You are a clown Bob. They are allowed to abuse Jews but the Jews arent allowed to object That sounds like GOP free speech.