Elon Musk to file ‘thermonuclear lawsuit’ as advertisers desert X

[Captain Caveman]

We are exposing the Muskan lie that there is free speech. Like capitalism itself, what Musk gives with the one hand, he takes away with the other.

But under socialism, you don't get the full amount in the first place, then you lose even more later in tax.

 

[badger2]

I was listening to Radio 4 the other day and his biographer said that Musk made Twitter into a predominantly Free Speech platform but has made contradictory decisions on managing that.

One would have to get the precise details about these contradictory decisions. Musk's fascist decision was to remove the eyes from those visitors who used to be able to read (current posts [italics]) on any Twitter page.

 

[justoffal]

Elon Musk to file âthermonuclear lawsuitâ as advertisers desert X

Social media firm boss says he will sue media watchdog that said ads were being placed alongside antisemitic content

www.theguardian.com

Iam not sure what his complaint is.

If you invite nazis on to your forum you have your free speech nirvana.

But there is no obligation on brands to support this.

Lots of decent people abhor the holocaust denial so beloved of muskys anti semite fanboys.
They dont want their brands associated with it.

If I held tesla stock I would be looking to sack musk. He is a liability

The accusation is vacuous at best and unprovable at worst.
The claim that these advertisements were purposely being saddled up to racist inputs is ludicrous. When you have a free speech forum it's likely that you'll be sharing space with people you disagree with. Musk will probably prevail.... Even though he doesn't need the money.

 

[justoffal]

Look in the mirror, fascist. You ooze group-think communist fascism in your every post, such as your comment above: "If I held tesla stock I would be looking to sack musk. He is a liability."

In other words, Musk is the enemy, he needs taken out because he doesn't comport with YOUR agenda. You ignore the fact that it is HIS business to run as he sees fit: to stay in business, he must comport with YOUR will or be taken out--- deprived of advertiser revenue, protested, sued, driven out of business bled dry until he is no more. You've said it ever since he took over Twitter and cleaned house of all of the infiltrators, collaborators and government ops.

COMMIE.

Within a decade X will be the largest and most valuable company in the history of commerce. Bet on it.

 

[badger2]

But under socialism, you don't get the full amount in the first place, then you lose even more later in tax.

Socialism becomes impossible precisely at the pivot point of necessary labor vs. surplus labor. There is socialist resonance with Musk's exclusionary fascist gesture. He has deemed non-members of less value than X members and has punished them accordingly. Socialist Musk seems to be defining non-members of X as "surplus labor," a floating signifier not required for his purposes @ X.

 

[badger2]

The accusation is vacuous at best and unprovable at worst.
The claim that these advertisements were purposely being saddled up to racist inputs is ludicrous. When you have a free speech forum it's likely that you'll be sharing space with people you disagree with. Musk will probably prevail.... Even though he doesn't need the money.

Your definition of "free speech forum" is faulty. Musk has excluded non-members. This is the fascism now linked to what used to be freer-speech Twitter.

 

[Captain Caveman]

One would have to get the precise details about these contradictory decisions. Musk's fascist decision was to remove the eyes from those visitors who used to be able to read (current posts [italics]) on any Twitter page.

I don't know the details on X because the R4 programme was predominantly about Elon and his father, and it touched on X, Tesla, PayPal etc..

Even Leon's mother said the the worst thing that can happen with Elon is to be like his father. So 90%+ of the time he's fine, then he can go off down dark paths and conspiracy theories.

Suffice to say, Ukraine is still Ukraine thanks to his satellites.

And Elon is just like everyone on the planet, he has flaws, but when you're in front of the camera........

I wonder what percentage of threads people post on what good others in the limelight have done.

 

[justoffal]

Your definition of "free speech forum" is faulty. Musk has excluded non-members. This is the fascism now linked to what used to be freer-speech Twitter.

I'm not sure what a member is as opposed to a non-member so I don't feel qualified to comment on it. I have an account that I barely use so I'm not 100% familiar with the process that you're speaking about. I do not know of the that anyone trying to establish a correlation between non-members and the idea of being paralleled with fascist and racist websites is going to have a huge uphill battle especially in light of the fact that you can find the same thing anywhere else on the web or even in any newspaper you pick up.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Socialism becomes impossible precisely at the pivot point of necessary labor vs. surplus labor. There is socialist resonance with Musk's exclusionary fascist gesture. He has deemed non-members of less value than X members and has punished them accordingly. Socialist Musk seems to be defining non-members of X as "surplus labor," a floating signifier not required for his purposes @ X.

Is that like saying, "So has the Times newspaper, it's behind a pay wall, it's deemed none members less value".

Excluding none paying members is not devaluing anyone, it's just trying to get your business to pay for itself, unfortunately businesses can't be charities.. More and more are going down route, especially the media.

 

[badger2]

I don't know the details on X because the R4 programme was predominantly about Elon and his father, and it touched on X, Tesla, PayPal etc..

Even Leon's mother said the the worst thing that can happen with Elon is to be like his father. So 90%+ of the time he's fine, then he can go off down dark paths and conspiracy theories.

Suffice to say, Ukraine is still Ukraine thanks to his satellites.

And Elon is just like everyone on the planet, he has flaws, but when you're in front of the camera........

I wonder what percentage of threads people post on what good others in the limelight have done.

Your speculative trajectory is touching on the scopic drive. At X, Musk is exploiting the scopic drive in H. sapiens. This drive says "I want to see it." Except behind the scenes, off-camera, Musk is clearly and violently preventing a certain class of H. sapiens from exercising their natural scopic tendencies. Here Musk is imitating the Ustashe who gave Pavelic the gift of 40 pounds of human eyeballs (Musk's Fascism thread, post #144).

 

[badger2]

I'm not sure what a member is as opposed to a non-member so I don't feel qualified to comment on it. I have an account that I barely use so I'm not 100% familiar with the process that you're speaking about. I do not know of the that anyone trying to establish a correlation between non-members and the idea of being paralleled with fascist and racist websites is going to have a huge uphill battle especially in light of the fact that you can find the same thing anywhere else on the web or even in any newspaper you pick up.

No, Musk's fascist mechanism is preventing the reading or viewing of posts at X. This is not the same thing as "you can find the same thing anywhere." Only at X is this fascist machine in place and operating.

 

[Captain Caveman]

No, Musk's fascist mechanism is preventing the reading or viewing of posts at X. This is not the same thing as "you can find the same thing anywhere." Only at X is this fascist machine in place and operating.

You're gonna get this thread dragged into the conspiracy theory section.

 

[badger2]

Is that like saying, "So has the Times newspaper, it's behind a pay wall, it's deemed none members less value".

Excluding none paying members is not devaluing anyone, it's just trying to get your business to pay for itself, unfortunately businesses can't be charities.. More and more are going down route, especially the media.

Fact: Twitter was freer speech and had no membership restrictions for non-members. Everything could be read and was in (chronological order [italics]) as are most other sites such as USMB. It's more sinister than simply capitalist profit. In the societies of control, media machines such as Musk's are commanding a tighter control of the audience. Musk has a desire to (control the audience [it.]), to control the scopic drive.

Fronting an alibi such as profit masks a more logical reason for control. Musk's chips in monkey brains while these primates are viewing computer screens and able to (press buttons [it.]), underlies the fronting alibi.

 

[badger2]

You're gonna get this thread dragged into the conspiracy theory section.

Like Musk's control of X, there is nothing we can do about it. We don't have control of the buttons.

 

[badger2]

Latin fascis 'to bundle.' Musk's repression @ X is tightening the bundle. It will of course, be badger2's fault.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The accusation is vacuous at best and unprovable at worst.
The claim that these advertisements were purposely being saddled up to racist inputs is ludicrous. When you have a free speech forum it's likely that you'll be sharing space with people you disagree with. Musk will probably prevail.... Even though he doesn't need the money.

It doesnt matter if they were purposeful or not. The advertisers didnt like it and that is all that matters.
Musk could choose to ensure that their ads were not associated with right wing filth. I am sure he has the capacity to do that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It doesnt matter if they were purposeful or not. The advertisers didnt like it and that is all that matters.
Musk could choose to ensure that their ads were not associated with right wing filth. I am sure he has the capacity to do that.

He does. But his business model has explicitly been to be inclusive to right wing nutsacks, because he thought that would max his revenue.

Whoops.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

He does. But his business model has explicitly been to be inclusive to right wing nutsacks, because he thought that would max his revenue.

Whoops.

I admire his principles.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Is that like saying, "So has the Times newspaper, it's behind a pay wall, it's deemed none members less value".

Excluding none paying members is not devaluing anyone, it's just trying to get your business to pay for itself, unfortunately businesses can't be charities.. More and more are going down route, especially the media.

The Guardian is free. So is the Mail and the Mirror. And the Independent

 

[badger2]

He does. But his business model has explicitly been to be inclusive to right wing nutsacks, because he thought that would max his revenue.

Whoops.

Yes, that inclusiveness reinforces his statist tendencies as a capitalist. What's schizo is that he does exclusions at the same time.