Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
You gotta love these CON$ervative mind-readers. CON$ are free to change anyone's words as they please because CON$ know that they were thinking.He may have used the term "National Universal Health Care" or something like that, but "Nationalized Health Care" would have been bad choice of phrase, as it describes something else entirely.
Do you have an example or link?
I do not have the link handy and I am sure that you have seen the Youtube video that I would have pulled up anyway. He said, Universal, I won't question that, but he described nationalized.
And yes, it would have been a bad choice of phrases. He knew that so he didn't say "Nationalized". He said, Universal.
I never said he was an idiot.
Immie
September 5, 2008
RUSH:*** He didn't use those words, but that's what he meant
October 4, 2007
RUSH:* We're dealing here with the potential loss of meaning when others get to say what other people meant. This is a dangerous direction that we're headed in."
October 21, 2008
RUSH:** He didn't say it in those words, but that's exactly what he meant.
October 3, 2007
RUSH:* We've reached a new day, when interpreters are allowed to determine the meaning of words spoken by others.* What happens with that is the loss of meaning.
Mind reader? I never said I was a mind reader. I am taking him at his word.
I believe that is what he was speaking of. Perhaps it is because I believe that all politicians (regardless of party) are untrustworthy.
I don't bow down at your messiah's altar and beg to blow him as you do.
I am however, bringing up my fears and attempting to discuss with LWC and RW in a rational tone. I'd love it if you would join in, however, I've never noticed you discussing anything in a rational manner. You are a partisan troll, plain and simple. Not even worth the time it took to type this out.
Immie