Economics 101

[Rshermr]

Don't worry - nobody else considers you an "expert" in anything either.
Good deal. Because I am not. The point is, that you are only an expert at janitorial supplies and such. You just are too stupid to understand that.

[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Can you please have an adult show you how to use this website?
Adult? Not you, then. I will do that as soon as you have an adult help you get your head out of your ass.

 

[P@triot]

If you want to pay the working class better, you need to require all business to do so. Then you can pay a higher wage and survive. Try to work that out in your little weak mind.

That's not even remotely true. You have less understanding of economics than a rodent.

Lets say you run a septic service business. If you pay the highest wages to attract the best people (the most reliable, the most professional, the most knowledgeable, etc.) then you will bring in the most customers. What you lose in higher wages you make up in volume. As your competitors being to go out of business, you can raise your prices a bit so that you don't even need the volume to make up the labor costs.

I know, I know - this is too complex for you. Ask the closest adult for help here.

 

[P@triot]

Lets check and see if you, a con troll, used any impartial sources

You are proven wrong in every post and all you ever do is cry like a little bitch that the source isn't "impartial". You've literally claimed that for hundreds of sources. You refuse to accept fact and you pretend that any source which doesn't support your blind ignorance isn't "impartial". You lose, stupid.[
That would be the opinion of a con troll who has achieved nothing in life. You are not, me boy, relevant. At all.
You posted SIX sources that are well known right wing nut case sources. Every single one. I post abc news, and you say it is a partial source. You just proved you are a nut case. Totally unable to make rational conversation. And a total con troll.
/QUOTE]

For the love of God....can you please have an adult show you how to use this site?!?

 

[Rshermr]

The point is, that you are only an expert at janitorial supplies and such. You just are too stupid to understand that.

There goes Rshermr again - "champion" of the working man demeaning and insulting the hard working American. He claims to "care" about others and then demeans just about every blue collar job there is out there (all while mooching off of those poor working folks because he doesn't want to hold a job).

Nice try. I care about all sorts of people, pretty much the entire middle class and all working people. I care about you so much it hurts. It is just that you are stupid. And you are indeed a janitor. Not my fault. You could have done more with yourself had you tried. But every other rational working person in the world deserves fair pay in my opinion. You have expressed that they deserve nothing in your opinion. That is so obvious to all involved that your statements just do not pass the giggle test.
So, a personal question. You post all day and all night. Don't you think you should get a real job at some point?

 

[P@triot]

Right. Unlike you, who thinks that:
1. Those in the Great Republican Recession of 1929 should not have gotten a minimum wage even as low as .25 per hour.

Yeah....um....where exactly did I say that?!? I wasn't around during the Great Dumbocrat Depression so I cannot comment on whether or not $0.25 per hour was a reasonable wage. However, since the greedy Dumbocrats (under FDR) handed it out, I have to assume it was actually way above what was necessary given that that is the history of the greedy Dumbocrat Party.

2. Believe that any increases in the minimum wage should never, ever happen.

Well that's not true at all. You're caught lying in every post you make. Adjusted for inflation, the current minimum wage of today should be $4.23 per hour.

3. Believe that the wants of the wealthy should be taken care of with no thought for the less wealthy.

Again - you continue to lie. Which is proof in itself that you're getting your ass kicked with facts in this debate and so you have to resort to lying. I don't believe anybody should be "taken care of" through government. Not the wealthy. Not the middle class. Not the poor. The wealthy and the middle class shouldn't need any assistance. The poor should get it through charities. But greedy Dumbocrats like you want guaranteed, unlimited "assistance" which you could never get through charities - so like a thug, you demand it be done at the barrel of a gun.

4. Believe that the company owner should get rich, and the workers who made it possible should get as little as possible.

Again - another lie. You're like Hitlery Clinton - a pathological liar. I believe everyone should earn exactly what they are worth. Like an ignorant Fidel Castro, Cuban socialist - you think everyone should make the same amount of money regardless of their talent, their effort, and their value. Most of that stems from your ignorance of basic economics. The rest of it comes from your ignorance of swallowing liberal propaganda.

 

[P@triot]

4, The business owner often gets rich, the worker never gets rich.

And??? Do you have a point here? Is the worker supposed to get "rich" in your ignorant mind?

The business owner took all the risk and has all of the responsibility. They deserve to get as wealthy as they are capable of getting. If the "worker" wants to accumulate wealth like the business owner, then they need to start their own damn business and become a business owner themselves. That's how life works, stupid.

 

[P@triot]

And you are indeed a janitor. Not my fault. You could have done more with yourself had you tried.

So, a personal question. You post all day and all night. Don't you think you should get a real job at some point?

Wait...what? I though I had a real job? I thought I was a "janitor"?

 

[Rshermr]

If you want to pay the working class better, you need to require all business to do so. Then you can pay a higher wage and survive. Try to work that out in your little weak mind.

That's not even remotely true. You have less understanding of economics than a rodent.
Funny. Says the janitor. It is found in economic history, and in business classes, me boy. Things you are unable to relate to.
Lets say you run a septic service business. If you pay the highest wages to attract the best people (the most reliable, the most professional, the most knowledgeable, etc.) then you will bring in the most customers. What you lose in higher wages you make up in volume. As your competitors being to go out of business, you can raise your prices a bit so that you don't even need the volume to make up the labor costs.

I know, I know - this is too complex for you. Ask the closest adult for help here
No, that was so stupid it was like finger nails on a chalk board.
Actually, that is again your opinion. That of a janitor. Here is a business lesson for you again. It is not Economics, me boy. It is taught in business classes, which you have insufficient intelligence to be allowed in to.
If you run a septic service, nearly all of your business will come to you based on price. And you will be out of business soon if you raise your rates. So you will not. Until the competitors raise their pay rates. And you do too. And that will only happen when they, and you, are forced to raise your pay rates.
Patriot, you need to stick to janitorial supplies and similar simple subjects.

.

 

[Rshermr]

4, The business owner often gets rich, the worker never gets rich.[/QUOTE] {/QUOTE]
And??? Do you have a point here? Is the worker supposed to get "rich" in your ignorant mind?

The business owner took all the risk and has all of the responsibility. They deserve to get as wealthy as they are capable of getting. If the "worker" wants to accumulate wealth like the business owner, then they need to start their own damn business and become a business owner themselves. That's how life works, stupid.
The point was so simple that only a congenital idiot could miss it. It was that the business owner can generally afford to pay, but prefers wealth.
Oh. I forgot. You are a congenital idiot. Sorry I went beyond your ability to comprehend.

 

[Rshermr]

And you are indeed a janitor. Not my fault. You could have done more with yourself had you tried.

So, a personal question. You post all day and all night. Don't you think you should get a real job at some point?

Wait...what? I though I had a real job? I thought I was a "janitor"?
As any rational person would understand, I was questioning your lack of work hours. If you are satisfied with being a janitor, seems fair to me. Would not be enough for me, but it seems to be for you. Got it. And, being stupid is generally a congenital issue. Nothing much you can do about it. Makes a person want to have someone tell you what to believe, avoid all that hard work of study, reading, and on and on. Just listen and believe, a simple life. Stupid, but simple.

 

[P@triot]

No, that was so stupid it was like finger nails on a chalk board.
Actually, that is again your opinion. That of a janitor. Here is a business lesson for you again. It is not Economics, me boy. It is taught in business classes, which you have insufficient intelligence to be allowed in to.
If you run a septic service, nearly all of your business will come to you based on price. And you will be out of business soon if you raise your rates. So you will not. Until the competitors raise their pay rates. And you do too. And that will only happen when they, and you, are forced to raise your pay rates.
Patriot, you need to stick to janitorial supplies and similar simple subjects.

I just owned you with facts, fool. I say you could raise your prices after you had put many of your competitors out of business. Again, you can't read (or write), you can't use a website, and you don't understand basic business. I proved you wrong. Deal with it.

 

[P@triot]

4, The business owner often gets rich, the worker never gets rich.
And??? Do you have a point here? Is the worker supposed to get "rich" in your ignorant mind?

The business owner took all the risk and has all of the responsibility. They deserve to get as wealthy as they are capable of getting. If the "worker" wants to accumulate wealth like the business owner, then they need to start their own damn business and become a business owner themselves. That's how life works, stupid.
The point was so simple that only a congenital idiot could miss it. It was that the business owner can generally afford to pay, but prefers wealth.
Oh. I forgot. You are a congenital idiot. Sorry I went beyond your ability to comprehend.

Still haven't figured out how to use a simple website. Still haven't explained what your point was. You said "the business owner often gets rich, the worker never gets rich". So? What is your point?

 

[P@triot]

And you are indeed a janitor. Not my fault. You could have done more with yourself had you tried.

So, a personal question. You post all day and all night. Don't you think you should get a real job at some point?

Wait...what? I though I had a real job? I thought I was a "janitor"?
As any rational person would understand, I was questioning your lack of work hours. If you are satisfied with being a janitor, seems fair to me. Would not be enough for me, but it seems to be for you. Got it. And, being stupid is generally a congenital issue. Nothing much you can do about it. Makes a person want to have someone tell you what to believe, avoid all that hard work of study, reading, and on and on. Just listen and believe, a simple life. Stupid, but simple.

And once again...this buffoon is so incapable of figuring out how to use a simple website that he makes it look like my posts are his posts.

Is there an adult anywhere near you that you could ask for help? Maybe they could also help you figure out your meds while they help you learn to use a simple website?

 

[Rshermr]

again - "champion" of the working man demeaning and insulting the hard working American. Hardly. You are not anything but a con troll, and you need to be knocked down. So I do it for entertainment. He claims to "care" about others and then demeans just about every blue collar job there is out there (all while mooching off of those poor working folks because he doesn't want to hold a job).
You are indeed delusional. I mooch off of no one. I paid social security at the maximum for over 40 years, and most of the time at the maximum rate. What social security pays me now is a return on that payment which supported others before me. I am certain I paid well over any amount you will ever pay in to social security. As you probably know.
Really, that you are stupid is obvious. But not your fault. It is congenital. Not your fault. Just plain bad luck.

 

[Rshermr]

And you are indeed a janitor. Not my fault. You could have done more with yourself had you tried.

So, a personal question. You post all day and all night. Don't you think you should get a real job at some point?

Wait...what? I though I had a real job? I thought I was a "janitor"?
As any rational person would understand, I was questioning your lack of work hours. If you are satisfied with being a janitor, seems fair to me. Would not be enough for me, but it seems to be for you. Got it. And, being stupid is generally a congenital issue. Nothing much you can do about it. Makes a person want to have someone tell you what to believe, avoid all that hard work of study, reading, and on and on. Just listen and believe, a simple life. Stupid, but simple.

And once again...this buffoon is so incapable of figuring out how to use a simple website that he makes it look like my posts are his posts.

Is there an adult anywhere near you that you could ask for help? Maybe they could also help you figure out your meds while they help you learn to use a simple website?

Is that it. You want to suggest my method of using this site is wrong. Here is an idea, me boy. Fuck off.

 

[Rshermr]

So Patriot, the angry janitor, says:
Wait...what? I though I had a real job? I thought I was a "janitor"?
As any rational person would understand, I was questioning your lack of work hours. If you are satisfied with being a janitor, seems fair to me. Would not be enough for me, but it seems to be for you. Got it. And, being stupid is generally a congenital issue. Nothing much you can do about it. Makes a person want to have someone tell you what to believe, avoid all that hard work of study, reading, and on and on. Just listen and believe, a simple life. Stupid, but simple.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Is there an adult anwhere near you that you could ask for help? Maybe they could also help you figure out your meds while they help you learn to use a simple website?

As soon as you find out what impartial sources are, and start using them, I will try to understand your lame comments regarding usage of this site. In the interim, perhaps you could try to make an economic argument, and drop the really ignorant personal attacks.
But for now, I have a football game to go watch.

 

[P@triot]

Is that it. You want to suggest my method of using this site is wrong. Here is an idea, me boy. Fuck off.

Oh I'm not "suggesting" - your dumb ass can't figure out how to use a simple freaking website. You keep making my posts look like they are your posts. It's ok though - based on the content of your posts - we've all figured out that you're simply not that bright.

 

[P@triot]

and you need to be knocked down.

Yep....that sounds like a typical ignorant libtard. Anyone who posts facts and speaks the truth is a danger to their socialist ideology so they need to be "knocked down".

Lucky for me - Rshermr here couldn't knock down a toddler.

 

[edthecynic]

Sorry cupcake....conservatives were in complete control during the 1920's and we had the "Roaring 20's". Liberals were in complete control during the 1930's and we got the "Great Depression". Those are the facts and they are indisputable.

None of your "facts" are ever facts, but you knew that already!

 

[edthecynic]

True, the "War on "Poverty" has failed, massively.

The 1996 Welfare Reform Act was highly successful. Until 2009 when Lame Duck Barack Hussein Obama forced through his Stimulus bill which gutted the successful Reform Act.

Obama gutted nothing. Just more Right-wing lies.

Do you have to lie in every post? Can you try telling the truth just a few times now and again?

How Obama has gutted welfare reform

Obama Guts Welfare Reform

Obama's End Run on Welfare Reform, Part Two: Dismantling Workfare

http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/238501-obama-kills-welfare-reform

House votes 246-181 to block Obama's welfare-work waiver rule

Waiving Work Requirements for Welfare Recipients: One Year Later, Just another Law Ignored by the Obama Administration - Ways and Means

The lies just keep on comimg. Just because the Right lie in packs does not make their lies any less of a lie1

Does Obama’s Plan ‘Gut Welfare Reform’?

Romney’s ad also distorts the facts when it says that under President Obama’s plan “you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job.” The law never required all welfare recipients to work. Only 29 percent of those receiving cash assistance met the work requirement by the time President Obama took office.

Under the new policy, states can now seek a federal waiver from work-participation rules that, among other things, require welfare recipients to engage in one of 12 specific “work activities,” such as job training. But, in exchange, states must develop a plan that would provide a “more efficient or effective means to promote employment,” which may or may not include some or all of the same work activities. States also must submit an “evaluation plan” that includes “performance measures” that must be met — or the waiver could be revoked.

Ron Haskins, a former Republican House committee aide who was instrumental in the 1996 overhaul of the welfare program, told us the Obama administration should not have unilaterally changed the work-requirement rules. But Haskins said the Romney claim that Obama’s plan will “gut welfare reform” is “very misleading.”

“I do not think it ends welfare reform or strongly undermines welfare reform,” said Haskins,co-director of the Brookings Institution’s Center on Children and Families. “Each state has to say what they will do and how that reform … will either increase employment or lead to better employment” of recipients.