Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is evidently neither old news nor “breaking news” that will ever cause you to question your hero Donald Trump. No surprise there.We all know who he was. Not exactly breaking news.
Did you miss 3 years of trying to get rid of a POTUS started by a fake FBI document, fake impeachments and now an indictment representing unequal justice?Really? I can find multiple incidences where one side or the other objected, but none were they prepared an alternate slate of electors, pressured tbe VP to overturn the results and incited a mob to stop the process. How exactly is it the “same”??
Surprisingly, your feeble-minded speculation doesn’t, in fact, qualify as a meaningful piece of this conversation.There is evidently neither old news nor “breaking news” that will ever cause you to question your hero Donald Trump. No surprise there.
Nice rhetorical flourish. Still meaningless, though.What about the “Eastman Coup Memo” as strategy to remain in power? Should V.P. Harris and the Democrats adopt it in 2024?
Nothing fake about the impeachments or the indictments.Did you miss 3 years of trying to get rid of a POTUS started by a fake FBI document, fake impeachments and now an indictment representing unequal justice?
Of course there is. Both impeachments were political theater without true substance.Nothing fake about the impeachments or the indictments.
One party impeachment, never Trumper indictment, unequal treatment. A committee headed by Trump haters. Withholding exculpatory evidence and false imprisonment of pro Trump protestors.Nothing fake about the impeachments or the indictments.
Wow. This just gets wider and wider. No wonder the investigations are taking so long. And Eastman isn't running for President, so they can take their time with him.It has been very under the radar, but is calling an impressive array of witnesses.
From the OP article…
That’s because Eastman and the California State Bar have amassed witness lists that include figures who have rarely spoken publicly about Jan. 6 but may hold valuable evidence — including Eastman himself, who is listed as a potential witness by the state bar’s trial counsel and by his own defense team. Their lists also include other high-profile figures, like former Bush administration lawyer John Yoo and Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who are slated to testify as experts about constitutional law or election administration.
Eastman’s list features Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who spoke with Trump multiple times on Jan. 6 and who helmed legal efforts to unravel the election results in multiple states; Peter Navarro, the former Trump trade adviser who authored discredited reports on election integrity during the final weeks of 2020; Kurt Hilbert, a lawyer who worked on Trump’s post-election litigation in Georgia; Linda Kerns, a lawyer who worked on Trump’s post-election lawsuit in Pennsylvania; former Georgia State Sen. William Ligon; Doug Logan, the CEO of far-right election “audit” firm Cyber Ninjas; and Russell Ramsland, who was involved with a review of voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan, that became the source of pro-Trump conspiracy theories.
Of course there is. Both impeachments were political theater without true substance.
The NYC indictment is pure nonsense.
And Smith’s Florida indictment seems to have zero merit supporting it.
To summarize:To summarize: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?…It's, like, incredible."
Nah…you proved my pointTo summarize:
When you need to quote some (admittedly stupid) hyperbole to “make” a “point,” you clearly have no point.
Nah. I disproved your failed effort to make a point.Nah…you proved my point
Trump and Russia: Trump’s campaign had documented contacts with Russian officials at a time when multiple intelligence sources confirmed Russian interference in our election process. While a necessary investigation insufficient evidence to support a criminal charge of collusion, there was plenty of evidence to support obstruction and lying and multiple criminal indictments and convictions. NOT impeachable, I might add, but if he had just been honest in the first place, it would have been over and done with rather quickly. Teflon Trump was never condemned, not even for his open support of Putin over American evidence to the contrary.Nah. I disproved your failed effort to make a point.
Face reality. That whole Russia Russia Russia thing blew up in your collective faces as the canard it always was.Trump and Russia: Trump’s campaign had documented contacts with Russian officials at a time when multiple intelligence sources confirmed Russian interference in our election process.
No, not really. How many indictments and convictions did Durham secure?Face reality. That whole Russia Russia Russia thing blew up in your collective faces as the canard it always was.
But feel free to cling to it.
I’m sorry. I don’t play irrelevant and meaningless games like that.No, not really. How many indictments and convictions did Durham secure?
www.nbcnews.com
I’m not talking about the number of jellybeans in County Fair guess the number jar.7,345
