Dr Ford agrees to testify under oath to Congress

[Pop23]

Kav never claimed Judge was a witness dimwit.

The book was published in 1997, by Fords high School buddy. If you were going to promote a lie about a gang rape, obviously you name a witness that published such a book.

Jesus H. Christ you are gullible.

You probably should have been tracking the posts today.
They stated unequivocally that Kav had a self-admitted "black-out drunk" and "drooling - often passed out in fetal position" witness who claimed it didn't happen.
Therefore it'd be YOU who is most certainly gullible and a fucking dimwit

It's her word against his. And her actions, waiting 3 decades, no witnesses, no evidence, the curious timing, coupled with Feinstein's timing of the release, etc., I'd say Ford's word isn't worth a shit compared to Kavanaugh's, not to mention his spotless record and stellar reputation. It's obviously another desperate attempt to accomplish through smears and slander what they failed to accomplish at the ballot box. They see what was once a clear path to a socialist utopia via an activist SC (who would rubber stamp every usurpation of our rights and freedoms) slipping through their sleazy little fingers and it's driving them completely crazy. Sooner or later they'll make an attempt to start a civil war to get what they want. That'll be their final mistake.

Yeah, we never saw any of this 11th hour bullshit during Merrick Garland's hearing.

Who exactly accused him of kidnapping and attempted rape? No?

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

 

[Pop23]

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

And the crime he was accused of halfwit?

You equating a lack of getting a hearing on his nominations with a SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATION, tells me all I need to know about you.

You have no moral code........

PERIOD!

There's not much that's funnier than a Trumpeter wittering on about a moral code. A rightie whining about a politicized nomination process comes close. I'll give you that.

I see the deflection. The question is why you feel guilty enough about your stupid damn statement to need to deflect.

You don't see a thing, or cognitive dissonance would shut you the fuck up. A Trump leghumper talking about a moral code, as if you conjured up some superiority.

Morals schmorals .. They've all sold their souls - including their evangelical contingency.

^^^^^^ more idiocy from the board idiot

 

[DrLove]

And the crime he was accused of halfwit?

You equating a lack of getting a hearing on his nominations with a SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATION, tells me all I need to know about you.

You have no moral code........

PERIOD!

There's not much that's funnier than a Trumpeter wittering on about a moral code. A rightie whining about a politicized nomination process comes close. I'll give you that.

I see the deflection. The question is why you feel guilty enough about your stupid damn statement to need to deflect.

You don't see a thing, or cognitive dissonance would shut you the fuck up. A Trump leghumper talking about a moral code, as if you conjured up some superiority.

Morals schmorals .. They've all sold their souls - including their evangelical contingency.

^^^^^^ more idiocy from the board idiot

^^^^^^ thinks Donald Trump is a moral person

 

[Pop23]

There's not much that's funnier than a Trumpeter wittering on about a moral code. A rightie whining about a politicized nomination process comes close. I'll give you that.

I see the deflection. The question is why you feel guilty enough about your stupid damn statement to need to deflect.

You don't see a thing, or cognitive dissonance would shut you the fuck up. A Trump leghumper talking about a moral code, as if you conjured up some superiority.

Morals schmorals .. They've all sold their souls - including their evangelical contingency.

^^^^^^ more idiocy from the board idiot

^^^^^^ thinks Donald Trump is a moral person

^^^^^^ needs to provide a link. (clue, he can't)

 

[joaquinmiller]

You probably should have been tracking the posts today.
They stated unequivocally that Kav had a self-admitted "black-out drunk" and "drooling - often passed out in fetal position" witness who claimed it didn't happen.
Therefore it'd be YOU who is most certainly gullible and a fucking dimwit

It's her word against his. And her actions, waiting 3 decades, no witnesses, no evidence, the curious timing, coupled with Feinstein's timing of the release, etc., I'd say Ford's word isn't worth a shit compared to Kavanaugh's, not to mention his spotless record and stellar reputation. It's obviously another desperate attempt to accomplish through smears and slander what they failed to accomplish at the ballot box. They see what was once a clear path to a socialist utopia via an activist SC (who would rubber stamp every usurpation of our rights and freedoms) slipping through their sleazy little fingers and it's driving them completely crazy. Sooner or later they'll make an attempt to start a civil war to get what they want. That'll be their final mistake.

Yeah, we never saw any of this 11th hour bullshit during Merrick Garland's hearing.

Who exactly accused him of kidnapping and attempted rape? No?

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

 

[Pop23]

It's her word against his. And her actions, waiting 3 decades, no witnesses, no evidence, the curious timing, coupled with Feinstein's timing of the release, etc., I'd say Ford's word isn't worth a shit compared to Kavanaugh's, not to mention his spotless record and stellar reputation. It's obviously another desperate attempt to accomplish through smears and slander what they failed to accomplish at the ballot box. They see what was once a clear path to a socialist utopia via an activist SC (who would rubber stamp every usurpation of our rights and freedoms) slipping through their sleazy little fingers and it's driving them completely crazy. Sooner or later they'll make an attempt to start a civil war to get what they want. That'll be their final mistake.

Yeah, we never saw any of this 11th hour bullshit during Merrick Garland's hearing.

Who exactly accused him of kidnapping and attempted rape? No?

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

 

[DrLove]

Yeah, we never saw any of this 11th hour bullshit during Merrick Garland's hearing.

Who exactly accused him of kidnapping and attempted rape? No?

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

If at this point, Pop doesn't understand that Donald J Trump may be the most amoral malignant narcissist on the planet, then nobody is gonna convince you of such.
Which makes further discussion pretty much a waste of time.

 

[Pop23]

Who exactly accused him of kidnapping and attempted rape? No?

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

If at this point, Pop doesn't understand that Donald J Trump may be the most amoral malignant narcissist on the planet, then nobody is gonna convince you of such.
Which makes further discussion pretty much a waste of time.

I see, no link, making you the most amoral malignant narcissist on the planet.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year.

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

 

[Pop23]

Because you are a dipshit, let me educate you on the difference between not getting a hearing on a SC nomination and a false rape allegation.

Man spends 46 years in prison for rape he didn't commit

Jones, now 65, was 19 when police arrested him on suspicion of abducting a nurse at gunpoint from a Baton Rouge hospital’s parking lot and raping her behind a building on the night of 2 October 1971. Jones was convicted of aggravated rape at a 1974 retrial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Now lets look at what happens to a Man who doesn't get a SC nomination hearing:

Merrick Garland - Wikipedia

Merrick Brian Garland (born November 13, 1952) is the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He has served on that court since 1997.

I'm thinking that's a pretty good gig with awesome pay.

Now, on with your moral equivalency argument...............

Or were you just exhibiting your idiocy for the whole world to see?

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

 

[miketx]

Sure gonna be fun seeing if old, white Republicans will have the balls to grill this lady; who has btw taken a lie detector test. This is an educated woman well versed in psychology - not Stormy Daniels. She's going to hold up quite well, as old white Republicans bleed more college educated suburban women.

Now she says it's not all true. Make up some more crap for us.

 

[joaquinmiller]

And you accused me of deflecting? You're one of the least aware pinheads I've encountered. If you want to concern yourself with moral codes other than your own, maybe you should look at the politicians you support, instead of posters on a chatboard.

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

Well, see if you can deflect to another irrelevant victim, then. That was touching.

 

[Pop23]

I can multitask, and you have yet to explain your moral equivalency as to not getting a hearing, then having a productive life afterwards, to being accused of sexual assault that could end your professional life.

I'm giving you an undeserved second chance dipshit.

Go

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

Well, see if you can deflect to another irrelevant victim, then. That was touching.

Duck and dodge the question all you want. You're getting kind of boring though.

 

[Pop23]

Sure gonna be fun seeing if old, white Republicans will have the balls to grill this lady; who has btw taken a lie detector test. This is an educated woman well versed in psychology - not Stormy Daniels. She's going to hold up quite well, as old white Republicans bleed more college educated suburban women.

Now she says it's not all true. Make up some more crap for us.

It's like playing cards with folks who make up the rules as they go, ain't it?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

Well, see if you can deflect to another irrelevant victim, then. That was touching.

Duck and dodge the question all you want. You're getting kind of boring though.

Do you consider it possible that Blasey Ford is telling the truth? You claim multi-tasking ability. Does that extend to abstract thought?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Sure gonna be fun seeing if old, white Republicans will have the balls to grill this lady; who has btw taken a lie detector test. This is an educated woman well versed in psychology - not Stormy Daniels. She's going to hold up quite well, as old white Republicans bleed more college educated suburban women.

Now she says it's not all true. Make up some more crap for us.

It's like playing cards with folks who make up the rules as they go, ain't it?

Oh, come on. You posted to me was about my moral code - something you only conceive in your imagination.

 

[Pop23]

Sure gonna be fun seeing if old, white Republicans will have the balls to grill this lady; who has btw taken a lie detector test. This is an educated woman well versed in psychology - not Stormy Daniels. She's going to hold up quite well, as old white Republicans bleed more college educated suburban women.

Now she says it's not all true. Make up some more crap for us.

It's like playing cards with folks who make up the rules as they go, ain't it?

Oh, come on. You posted to me was about my moral code - something you only conceive in your imagination.

Because you equated the loss of a hearing with being accused of sexual assault.

Stop the squawking and start the talking about how these are even remotely equivalent.

Go

 

[Pop23]

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

Well, see if you can deflect to another irrelevant victim, then. That was touching.

Duck and dodge the question all you want. You're getting kind of boring though.

Do you consider it possible that Blasey Ford is telling the truth? You claim multi-tasking ability. Does that extend to abstract thought?

Absolutely there is a chance that what she is stating actually happened. Yet I base all my opinions on proof.

A baseless allegation, whose ONLY EVIDENCE is notes from a therapist, WHO BOTH HER AND HER HUSBAND CLAIM CONTAINS GRIEVOUS ERRORS ain't enough.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Sure gonna be fun seeing if old, white Republicans will have the balls to grill this lady; who has btw taken a lie detector test. This is an educated woman well versed in psychology - not Stormy Daniels. She's going to hold up quite well, as old white Republicans bleed more college educated suburban women.

Now she says it's not all true. Make up some more crap for us.

It's like playing cards with folks who make up the rules as they go, ain't it?

Oh, come on. You posted to me was about my moral code - something you only conceive in your imagination.

Because you equated the loss of a hearing with being accused of sexual assault.

Stop the squawking and start the talking about how these are even remotely equivalent.

Go

Show me where I claimed equivalence.

I said, "Garland didn't get a hearing, dummy. Righties whining about a politicized process left the seat empty for a year."

Then I said, "There's not much that's funnier than a Trumpeter wittering on about a moral code. A rightie whining about a politicized nomination process comes close. I'll give you that."

Then you started trolling about 'guilt', 'adults', 'big stuff'.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Kavanaugh is still a judge. He hasn't lost his gig. What are you whining about? At least he's getting a hearing.

That's not the moral equivalency you promised.

But I didn't think you would supply one.

Well, see if you can deflect to another irrelevant victim, then. That was touching.

Duck and dodge the question all you want. You're getting kind of boring though.

Do you consider it possible that Blasey Ford is telling the truth? You claim multi-tasking ability. Does that extend to abstract thought?

Absolutely there is a chance that what she is stating actually happened. Yet I base all my opinions on proof.

A baseless allegation, whose ONLY EVIDENCE is notes from a therapist, WHO BOTH HER AND HER HUSBAND CLAIM CONTAINS GRIEVOUS ERRORS ain't enough.

You've already decided it's baseless?