1. First JakeStarkey insisted I am opposed to Constitutional Republican Govt assuming that whatever I was proposing about resolving political beliefs by consensus was derailing, overriding or disobeying the given system instead of working with it. 2. Then Debra K said I have not proposed any govt reforms, and then said she has spent enough time replying to my msgs. Well, if she didn't read or reply to any of my msgs proposing reforms or solutions, to the point she didn't think I HAVE been, then isn't this "willful ignorance" coming from her not me. So I challenge both JakeStarkey to prove how any of the proposed reforms I have offered can't be done using the given system, of Constitutional separation of branches and checks and balances, and the current political process, including legislative and legal processes all citizens can use, and the Media and Political Parties and even Corporate structures that are OUTSIDE govt and can still be used to support not thwart the Constitutional process of representation and redressing grievances. To build public policy based on consensus when it comes to political beliefs that differ by party. And challenge Debra K to prove I have not proposed any govt reforms or solutions. When these are posted all over online: Earned Amnesty http://www.freedmenstown.org http:/www.ethics-commission.net Before I was at USMB, my summaries of political reforms and solutions were also posted on backpage and yahoo answers, as I have been working on editing these for years and years. I have posted over and over the plans for sustainable campus systems to REPLACE WELFARE and to restore historic communities such as the one I live in that first developed and passed this plan through Congress, through federal legislation to reform public housing: http://www.campusplans.org and I even expanded on it to show it could be applied to a comprehensive immigration reform to develop the border as sustainable military prisons, teaching hospitals and educational and production sites to replace trafficking and sweatshops: Earned Amnesty I don't claim credit for AUTHORING these idea, but promoting them, as authored by neighbors Lenwood Johnson and the local Resident Council, and signed by Sheila Jackson Lee. See Freedmen s Town Historic Churches and Vet Housing under APV Guiding Principles. What I did beyond that was to propose to expand on this campus model to solve problems on the border with trafficking and security. So none of this counts because Debra K doesn't care to read it. So that means I didn't propose any solutions? Unlike Debra K assumption of me without knowing anything about what I have been doing for 20 years, I have met with community leaders and local bank leaders at meetings at the Federal Reserve, presenting plans for FUNDING these plans by issuing currency, credits or reimbursements to represent the DEBTS and damages owed to taxpayers for destruction of sites such as Freedmen's Town I propose to use as a national model. So the money to invest in restoration would be backed against the value of the property and proposed campus program based on the debts that taxpayers already incurred from millions of public money spent destroying national history there. I had hope that since Debra K posted about the importance of Constitutional education, she might see the VALUE of setting up a campus where community members and future leaders can be trained in government and managing public resources and services, so that all members of society have access to education and experience BEFORE running for public office. But, according to Debra K, I have not proposed any solutions. So what have I been spending over 60,000 funding and working two jobs to promote with nonprofits in communities destroyed by govt abuses? Is it not insulting I can spend 15-20 years working on solutions to govt problems, starting with my own district, and applying the same model to other areas, and I can work two jobs since 2008 to pay for the nonprofit groups struggling to realize these educational plans to reform govt, and someone like Debra K, who actually AGREES on Constitutional education, can assume I am doing or offering nothing worth reading? ??? Would you be insulted if someone ASSUMED that about you, if you spent the last 20 years working on plans, presenting them to federal state and city officials, and even funding the nonprofit volunteers who put these plans together as a team. Only to be told I have not offered anything, and don't deserve to be heard. Debra K and JakeStarkey can you please explain your statements which I don't think apply to me. I work two jobs to pay costs of the nonprofit volunteers who have developed these campus proposals to reform govt, and yes it uses the given system. Can you please explain why you insist on insulting my efforts and intentions this way. Thanks.