Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Biden is totally innocent. Right? Hey stupid, did you ever explain why his son was hired for that job he was unqualified for and paid as much as he was paid and why biden bragged about getting the prosecutor fired that was investigating it?Trump didn’t bring up some other organizations. He actually didn’t even mention Burisma in the phone call. He only mentioned Democrats. That’s a coincidence?
You are correct that he didn't mention Burisma by name, instead referring to Crowdstrike. But he didn't mention Democrats, either. That's a coincidence?
Don't take the bait.
He mentioned Biden. Is he not a Democrat? I believe he is.
The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
I keep asking democrats where is the law that states that if you're currently running for president that you are immune to investigation for past behavior as vice president and they keep coming up with nothing.
So...why haven't you investigated it? You've had 3 years of control, and agencies that are supposed to investigate these things lawfully.
Biden is totally innocent. Right? Hey stupid, did you ever explain why his son was hired for that job he was unqualified for and paid as much as he was paid and why biden bragged about getting the prosecutor fired that was investigating it?Trump didn’t bring up some other organizations. He actually didn’t even mention Burisma in the phone call. He only mentioned Democrats. That’s a coincidence?
You are correct that he didn't mention Burisma by name, instead referring to Crowdstrike. But he didn't mention Democrats, either. That's a coincidence?
Don't take the bait.
He mentioned Biden. Is he not a Democrat? I believe he is.
Hmmmm?
If not then go stick a finger in your ass and smell it.
Is Bolton saying it’s untrue? Doesn’t look like it to me.The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Right after you subpoena Rudy, right? Why did the House not give Rudy a subpoena, and why did you chicken out on the Bolton subpoena?The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Even if it turns out to be another bogus story, thinking people should be on guard against falling into the fallacious trap that President Trump committed some high crime or misdemeanor by pressuring Ukraine to investigate its past corrupt practices before receiving future aid from the United States.
The sole reason for even questioning Trump's actions is because it potentially involves a high-profile Democrat candidate for that Party's presidential nomination. Since when is that a legitimate immunization from criminal investigation?
Instead of Burisma, if President Trump had cited another corrupt organization without ties to Democrats, he would have been credited with fighting corruption and safeguarding public funds.
Don't take the bait that this was some sort of improper action. President Trump has been calling out corruption wherever he sees it. We should thank him for it.
Trump didn’t bring up some other organizations. He actually didn’t even mention Burisma in the phone call. He only mentioned Democrats. That’s a coincidence?
He will...the quote is wrong....Bolton wrote about the aid being held up and members of Trump's team calling for the release of the aid....but Bolton didn't write that it was connected to Biden and any particular investigation.....the Times is speculating again.....The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Has Bolton denied anything?
Has Bolton been Subpoenaed?The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Has Bolton denied anything?
I keep asking democrats where is the law that states that if you're currently running for president that you are immune to investigation for past behavior as vice president and they keep coming up with nothing.
So...why haven't you investigated it? You've had 3 years of control, and agencies that are supposed to investigate these things lawfully.
Because merely asking the question unleashed this “whistleblower” farce and impeach sham. The Deep state will obviously do anything to protect the corrupt Washington way of doing business.
He will...the quote is wrong....Bolton wrote about the aid being held up and members of Trump's team calling for the release of the aid....but Bolton didn't write that it was connected to Biden and any particular investigation.....the Times is speculating again.....The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Has Bolton denied anything?
Fiction.Even if it turns out to be another bogus story, thinking people should be on guard against falling into the fallacious trap that President Trump committed some high crime or misdemeanor by pressuring Ukraine to investigate its past corrupt practices before receiving future aid from the United States.
The sole reason for even questioning Trump's actions is because it potentially involves a high-profile Democrat candidate for that Party's presidential nomination. Since when is that a legitimate immunization from criminal investigation?
Instead of Burisma, if President Trump had cited another corrupt organization without ties to Democrats, he would have been credited with fighting corruption and safeguarding public funds.
Don't take the bait that this was some sort of improper action. President Trump has been calling out corruption wherever he sees it. We should thank him for it.
Trump didn’t bring up some other organizations. He actually didn’t even mention Burisma in the phone call. He only mentioned Democrats. That’s a coincidence?
They Dems were the party when Biden was extorting money for his druggie son while O was covertly overthrowing the ukraine govt.
Has Bolton been Subpoenaed?The Times has not checked this story out....all hearsay....seems the story originated in the agency that pre reads manuscripts of appointed and elected persons....the same agency that Vindman works in...The times is misquoting Bolton's manuscript....
Should be easy enough to clear up by asking Bolton to testify under oath.
Has Bolton denied anything?
When is Rudy getting Subpoenaed?
4 Years of a Non Stop Siege against America and The White House over a Lie The Democrat Party Financed is proof of a Deep State.I keep asking democrats where is the law that states that if you're currently running for president that you are immune to investigation for past behavior as vice president and they keep coming up with nothing.
So...why haven't you investigated it? You've had 3 years of control, and agencies that are supposed to investigate these things lawfully.
Because merely asking the question unleashed this “whistleblower” farce and impeach sham. The Deep state will obviously do anything to protect the corrupt Washington way of doing business.
Did it? Why is it I find that difficult to believe when for 3 years you have had control of Executive and Senate and for two of those years you had control of the House as well. Trump's alleged "admittance" of corruption on a television show has been publicly available all that time, and Trump has had control over the DoJ with his hand picked people. Yet despite all this - you did NOTHING until an election year when it just so happens your target is Trump's strongest opponent? How odd.
Either you (the Republicans and Trumpists) are utterly incompetent.
Or....the real reason for all this is Trump's reelection bid.
Trying to blame it on this nebulous "deep state" conspiracy wears thin the more layers you have to defend.
