Donald Trump goes after Bernie Sanders in new attack video!

Wonder how they feel with all the NEW muslim scum, that has been raping their women and children, robbing and murdering?...GOOD for socialism, I'm sure....
I believe you're referring to Denmark. If I'm right, what does that epidemic of violent crime have to do with the Danish economy?

The Danes have enjoyed a peaceful social atmosphere for so long it will take them awhile to adjust to this eruption of violent crime by Muslim immigrants. But rest assured they will deal with it.

So much for your resentful bitterness. Returning to the topic of this thread, do you have any thoughts on the Danish economy or the relative contentment of the Danish people and their social structure you'd like to share with us?
 
Hey bernie, your paycheck comes from capitalism.
if you don't like it...move to Europe.
Bernie Sanders is not opposed to capitalism, which is and has been the economic engine of the U.S. He speaks against laissez-faire capitalism, the effect of which is seen in the One Percent of greedy money hoarders who have upset the economic balance we once enjoyed.

Capitalism is a good system -- provided its mechanism is closely controlled by the kind of socialist regulations which were responsible for the growth of the Great America Middle Class which is under assault by the One Percenters. This assault began when the socialist regulations were removed, mainly by Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.
 
Saunders is probably a little ahead of his time, but one of the signs of our growth is that few Republicans have labeled Saunders a communist. In the 1930's Republicans labeled Social Security as the beginning of communism in the United States.
 
Saunders is probably a little ahead of his time, but one of the signs of our growth is that few Republicans have labeled Saunders a communist. In the 1930's Republicans labeled Social Security as the beginning of communism in the United States.

We too, can be like Venezuela..........what a vision.....:smoke:.
 
LOL Webb is the only candidate Dem's have who's not a joke.
Is he the only one under 70
Bernie would be 79 when sworn in and 87 if he lasted 8 years. Too old to be prez.

Sanders was born in 41. He will be 76 in his first year

In comparison, our oldest president, Reagan, turned 70 during his first year.

You claim of being too old was said of Reagan as well. such claims didn't stop him, why should it stop Sanders.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 
I remembered when that happened. Sanders looked like a scared little white boy surrounded by black thugs.
In Sanders' place, how would you have dealt with that situation?


not let them talk and be selfish for one....
The problem there is -- how

Bernie Sanders is a civilized statesman. Those fat cows who attacked his position on that platform were a pack of uncivilized ghetto n!ggers who understand only physical force or an imposing threat of it. Nothing short of violence could have removed them and that was out of the question.

Sanders did the right thing by simply backing away and allowing the public to assess what was happening and who was doing it. That was a situation for the police to deal with, but it's not surprising the police were conspicuously absent.
 
LOL Webb is the only candidate Dem's have who's not a joke.
Is he the only one under 70
Bernie would be 79 when sworn in and 87 if he lasted 8 years. Too old to be prez.

Sanders was born in 41. He will be 76 in his first year

In comparison, our oldest president, Reagan, turned 70 during his first year.

You claim of being too old was said of Reagan as well. such claims didn't stop him, why should it stop Sanders.

Matter of fact the same thing was constantly said about Hillary. Until Rump, who's older than Hillary, threw his hair into the race. Suddenly the "she's too old" crowd went eerily silent.
 
Bernie would be 79 when sworn in and 87 if he lasted 8 years. Too old to be prez.
Don't be too sure of that.

With age comes wisdom and Bernie is an exceptionally healthy and energetic fellow. Even if he didn't make it through a presumptive eight years, that vigorous, motivated old man can do a lot of really good things for us in just one or two years. So because we might not have it all why say no to what we can have?

Put the hammer in his hand and let him do what he can.
 
:lol: The more desperate he gets, the funnier he gets.
I'd be laughing at Trump, too, were it not for the fact that he's running in front of the pack and the thought of a Trump presidency is too scary to laugh about. If an ignorant elitist fop like George W. Bush could be elected, twice, the same fools who did that could very well do it again.

Consider the fact that Trump, who is not asking for money, has already been given over three million dollars. That is evidence of a very strong undercurrent.
 
Who, with straight face (other than a pajama-clad closetcrat) claim that Nutty Old Uncle Bernie would not make a far better president than Jeb, even on Jebbie's BEST and Bernie's WORST day?
 
Matter of fact the same thing was constantly said about Hillary. Until Rump, who's older than Hillary, threw his hair into the race. Suddenly the "she's too old" crowd went eerily silent.

They're both too old. And both too stupid.
 
:lol: The more desperate he gets, the funnier he gets.
I'd be laughing at Trump, too, were it not for the fact that he's running in front of the pack and the thought of a Trump presidency is too scary to laugh about. If an ignorant elitist fop like George W. Bush could be elected, twice, the same fools who did that could very well do it again.

Consider the fact that Trump, who is not asking for money, has already been given over three million dollars. That is evidence of a very strong undercurrent.

If this were October 2016, that might be a concern. But it isn't.
Know who the frontrunner was four years ago, October 2011? Herman Cain.
October 2007? Rudy Giuliani. Followed by Fred Thompson.

It's way too early to take anything like this seriously. Primaries don't even start until next year. This is the time the unknowns and unprovens bubble to the surface, to see if they can breathe.

As for sheeple voluntarily sending Rump money--- whose word are we taking for that?
 
If this were October 2016, that might be a concern. But it isn't.

Know who the frontrunner was four years ago, October 2011? Herman Cain.
October 2007? Rudy Giuliani. Followed by Fred Thompson.

It's way too early to take anything like this seriously. Primaries don't even start until next year. This is the time the unknowns and unprovens bubble to the surface, to see if they can breathe.

As for sheeple voluntarily sending Rump money--- whose word are we taking for that?
You're right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top