Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Don Ho would be proud!
- Thread starter froggy
- Start date
Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #2
Im sure God will now smite them with disastor huh?
- Aug 18, 2009
- 12,484
- 2,648
- 245
- Thread starter
- #3
Im sure God will now smite them with disastor huh?
Ya never know.
Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #4
Tell me how all of your neighbors marriages effect your marriage?
random3434
Senior Member
- Jun 29, 2008
- 25,899
- 7,791
- 48
Hawaii Senate passes civil unions bill - Yahoo! Singapore News
Hawaii Senate passes civil unions bill | ajc.com
Hawaii Senate passes civil unions bill | ajc.com
HONOLULU — The Hawaii Senate approved same-sex civil unions Friday, potentiallysetting up the measure for final passage as soon as next week.
Supporters of the civil unions bills celebrate by clapping and cheering, Friday, Jan. 22, 2010 in Honolulu. The Hawaii Senate approved same-sex civil unions Friday, potentially setting up the measure for final passage as soon as next week. The Senate passed the bill on an 18-7 vote, moving it to the House and signaling that the Senate's Democratic majority has enoughvotes to override a possible veto from Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.
The Senate passed the bill on an 18-7 vote, moving it to the House and signaling that the Senate's Democratic majority has enough votes to override a possible veto from Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.
dilloduck
Diamond Member
Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
random3434
Senior Member
- Jun 29, 2008
- 25,899
- 7,791
- 48
Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
You do see the words "Civil Union" right there in front of you, don't you Dillo? Don't you think that's fair?
Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #8
Sanity will soon reach the rest of the 50 and the anti gay people will be remembered much the same as the KKK now.
Just more dictatorship by the judiciary.
Once again the people don't get to vote on the issue.
Once again the people don't get to vote on the issue.
dilloduck
Diamond Member
Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
You do see the words "Civil Union" right there in front of you, don't you Dillo? Don't you think that's fair?
yes honey---I see it. I've always been pro civil-unions but many gay people want more so I'm suggesting getting "united" in ADDITION to having a civil union.
California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,058
- 0
- Banned
- #12
You might wanna merge the other thread on this.
No matter, the people of the state didn't get to vote on the issue.Just more dictatorship by the judiciary.
Once again the people don't get to vote on the issue.
yeah, the senate's the judiciary all right.
del
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #14
No matter, the people of the state didn't get to vote on the issue.Just more dictatorship by the judiciary.
Once again the people don't get to vote on the issue.
yeah, the senate's the judiciary all right.
they elected the senators.
the people don't get to vote directly on anything unless they live someplace that has a town meeting form of govt.
Anguille
Bane of the Urbane
- Mar 8, 2008
- 17,910
- 2,264
- 48
Seriously?
Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
No.
Let the religious opposition change the name of their rituals and covenants to whatever they like if they can't share use of the word "marriage". They all have different rituals and covenants anyway. The State is more practical and uniform in how it uses the term.
Why are some religious people so whiney and unwilling to share? It it the 11th Commandment or something?
- Aug 18, 2009
- 12,484
- 2,648
- 245
- Thread starter
- #17
No matter, the people of the state didn't get to vote on the issue.Just more dictatorship by the judiciary.
Once again the people don't get to vote on the issue.
yeah, the senate's the judiciary all right.
Then it should be nullified.
dilloduck
Diamond Member
Seriously?
Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
No.
Let the religious opposition change the name of their rituals and covenants to whatever they like if they can't share use of the word "marriage". They all have different rituals and covenants anyway. The State is more practical and uniform in how it uses the term.
Why are some religious people so whiney and unwilling to share? It it the 11th Commandment or something?
great--lets share the meaning of all words. That outta make communication very house.
Anguille
Bane of the Urbane
- Mar 8, 2008
- 17,910
- 2,264
- 48
What? I have no idea what you said.Seriously?Seriously----can't gays just use the word 'united' or something and appease all the opposition that only exists because of the word 'marriage' ?
No.
Let the religious opposition change the name of their rituals and covenants to whatever they like if they can't share use of the word "marriage". They all have different rituals and covenants anyway. The State is more practical and uniform in how it uses the term.
Why are some religious people so whiney and unwilling to share? It it the 11th Commandment or something?
great--lets share the meaning of all words. That outta make communication very house.
dilloduck
Diamond Member
What? I have no idea what you said.Seriously?
No.
Let the religious opposition change the name of their rituals and covenants to whatever they like if they can't share use of the word "marriage". They all have different rituals and covenants anyway. The State is more practical and uniform in how it uses the term.
Why are some religious people so whiney and unwilling to share? It it the 11th Commandment or something?
great--lets share the meaning of all words. That outta make communication very house.
Just an little experiments in sharing the meaning of envelopes.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 751
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 320
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 463
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 317
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 143
- Replies
- 220
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 451
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-