DOJ OK’s Voter Fraud

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Capitalist, Jul 8, 2010.

  1. Capitalist
    Offline

    Capitalist Jeffersonian Liberal

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    835
    Thanks Received:
    209
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +211
    J. Christian Adams told the US Commission on Civil Rights that the Obama Department of Justice has a mandate not to enforce the law that includes keeping ineligible voters on the rolls.
    Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

    FOX Nation reported: This week Adams told the commission, “The [voting] section doesn’t want to protect white voters.” And he named names. He testified that Deputy Assistant Attorney General Julie Fernandes told Voting Section management that there would be no more cases brought against black defendants vindicating the rights of white victims. Adams personally heard Fernandes say that the division would only bring “traditional civil rights cases” (code words for suits against white racists). Adams also heard Fernandes say that she had no interest in the Voting Section enforcing Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (which requires purging rolls of ineligible voters to prevent voter fraud), because Section 8 does not increase voter turnout. Fernandes now needs to be questioned under oath, as does the head of the Civil Rights Division, Thomas Perez, who previously testified this was not the Justice Department’s policy and that he was unaware of such views.


    John Fund at The Wall Street Journal reported:
    But there is some evidence backing up Mr. Adams. Last year, Justice abandoned a case it had pursued for three years against Missouri for failing to clean up its rolls. When filed in 2005, one-third of Missouri counties had more registered voters than voting-age residents. What’s more, Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, a Democrat who this year is her party’s candidate for a vacant U.S. Senate seat, contended that her office had no obligation to ensure individual counties were complying with the federal law mandating a cleanup of their voter rolls.
    The case made slow but steady progress through the courts for more than three years, amid little or no evidence of progress in cleaning up Missouri’s voter rolls. Despite this, Obama Justice saw fit to dismiss the case in March 2009. Curiously, only a month earlier, Ms. Carnahan had announced her Senate candidacy. Missouri has a long and documented history of voter fraud in Democratic-leaning cities such as St. Louis and Kansas City. Ms. Carnahan may now stand to benefit from voter fraud facilitated by the improperly kept voter rolls that she herself allowed to continue.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Every study of the vote says there is no threat of false votes from these types of rolls.

    You want money spent to solve no problem, WHY??????
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    You ask for proof of voter fraud. THIS is proof. But you claim otherwise. Now if those counties were Republican we would hear you screaming for action.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    How is it voter fraud you fool?
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    How? Ok you fucking dumb ass, explain how a County has more registered voters then citizens? And how they got there.
     
  6. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Dead people and people moving.

    Now show how any election was adversely effected by this problem?
     
  7. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,529
    Thanks Received:
    8,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,148
    How can lying about who is registered to vote be fraud? How can lying be fraudulent? I don't know. Maybe because lying is the freakin definition of fraud!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    4 years proves you wrong dumb ass. If one does not vote at least once every 2 to 4 years they are removed from the rolls. If after 4 years the names are still there someone is PUTTING them there or voting for them.

    Further it is fraud because the STATE knows who is a false registrant and REFUSES to remove the invalid illegal name from the rolls. Fraud because it is State wide. Fraud because it enables the ability to effect a vote. Fraud because the State does not care as long as it is Democrat votes.
     
  9. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    You are pulling shit out of your ass again.

    NO ONE claimed it created false vote you fucking liar.
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    One does not have to make said claim, all one need do is show that names that are not legit are on the rolls. That would be why the Federal Government was suing the State to remove KNOWN false names. And the reason Obama wants those names to remain? When the DOJ was winning and enforcing the law?
     

Share This Page