Does Pornography Harm Children Who View It?

Status
Not open for further replies.
5 years? and you blast me for too much time on my hands? Mmkay. Pot calling the kettle black methinks.

Anyhoo, if you can't discuss a topic without making it personal maybe you should find an easier site? Or group on this one.

You are the one that made it personal, if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen
 
then why is something sexual always involved ?

Sex crimes are not "sexual".

Actually, just the opposite.

Sex crime refers to assaults (violence) directed specificly at parts of the body assiciated with sexual behaviours. They aren't 'sexual acts,' they're simply being directed at the genitals, buttocks, and female breasts.

Wrong----a sex crime does not have to involve assault --educate yourself.
 
Sex crimes are not "sexual".

Actually, just the opposite.

Sex crime refers to assaults (violence) directed specificly at parts of the body assiciated with sexual behaviours. They aren't 'sexual acts,' they're simply being directed at the genitals, buttocks, and female breasts.

Wrong----a sex crime does not have to involve assault --educate yourself.

Didn't say it did. Was referring to the aforementioned usage of the term. But you knew that, you're just kissing ass.
 
and "sex crimes" are not about sex, but are about violence.

Dogma. Liberal dogma.

Look at the age range of female sex crimes victims. 80% of attacks are on women under the age of 30. Girls ages 16-19 are four times more likely than the general population to be victims of sexual assault.

Rape is mostly about sex. Date rape is all about sex. Some rapes though are about violence, to dehumanize the woman.

Those girls between 16-19 are in social environments with boys of the age, horny buggers all. Those guys aren't out there focused on punching women, they're out to get poon-tang and matters spiral out of control.
 
Why would I want to google that and justify an act so depraved that it should sicken any human alive. Especially toward a child.

Stop justifying the sex part of this depravity

Yes, heaven forbid people talking about things ever bother studying them. You must be a Republican.

And, how does education "justify" anything at all?

I am continually surprised at the ignorance from the right. Simply put, not all sex is about sex and not all porn is bad.

It may not be about sex to the rapist but it sure is hell is about sex to the victim. Enough to change the woman and children sex lives forever.
Children are now viciously raping other children on the school bus. Where are the learning this stuff. Movies, games and porn in the web???
 
Pornography can have a negative effect on how men relate to women sexually; their expections from pornographic material seldom are met in real relationships. In the case of young children, this can have a profound effect.

We can say the same about women and romance novels, romantic comedies, and female peer networks.
 
and "sex crimes" are not about sex, but are about violence.

Dogma. Liberal dogma.

Look at the age range of female sex crimes victims. 80% of attacks are on women under the age of 30. Girls ages 16-19 are four times more likely than the general population to be victims of sexual assault.

Rape is mostly about sex. Date rape is all about sex. Some rapes though are about violence, to dehumanize the woman.

Those girls between 16-19 are in social environments with boys of the age, horny buggers all. Those guys aren't out there focused on punching women, they're out to get poon-tang and matters spiral out of control.

Like I said, boils down to which side you choose to come down on. And it's possible both are right.
 
Sex crime refers to assaults (violence) directed specificly at parts of the body assiciated with sexual behaviours. They aren't 'sexual acts,' they're simply being directed at the genitals, buttocks, and female breasts.

Wrong----a sex crime does not have to involve assault --educate yourself.

Didn't say it did. Was referring to the aforementioned usage of the term. But you knew that, you're just kissing ass.

LOL kissing ass ? It's your quote !
 
Prove why not.

Porn isn't addictive.

True.

We know people addicted by porn.

Two kinds of addiction: physical and psychological. Physical's like heroin, cocaine, meth. Psychological addiction can be to anything including a glass of water. So in the sense than we can become psychologically addicted to anything, yes, porn is addictive. But not really. :)

Skimmed by this did ya?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...-harm-children-who-view-it-2.html#post9562722
 
Sex crime refers to assaults (violence) directed specificly at parts of the body assiciated with sexual behaviours. They aren't 'sexual acts,' they're simply being directed at the genitals, buttocks, and female breasts.

Wrong----a sex crime does not have to involve assault --educate yourself.

Didn't say it did. Was referring to the aforementioned usage of the term. But you knew that, you're just kissing ass.

You claim I made things personal. But you are the one who makes these kinds of statements when people are sincerely giving their thoughts on this thread. What is your problem. You can't get enough people to agree with this garbage thinking?
 
Canada has guns but they don't murder each other the way we do in the US.

Their black and Hispanic populations are miniscule. Our homicide rate is 5.1 per 100,000. Canada's homicide rate is 1.6 per 100,000. Our white homicide rate is 2.5 per 100,000. Our white homicide rate is almost identical to Finland's homicide rate.

Yes, 2.5 is greater than 1.6 but that's still still within the range seen within European nations. Our white homicide rate is lower than that of Estonia or Lithuania or Latvia, for instance.

At the end of WWII, other countries invested in their own people, their own future. That's why they have better medicine.

They have different population demographics and that's reflected in their medical outcomes.
 
Yes, heaven forbid people talking about things ever bother studying them. You must be a Republican.

And, how does education "justify" anything at all?

I am continually surprised at the ignorance from the right. Simply put, not all sex is about sex and not all porn is bad.

It may not be about sex to the rapist but it sure is hell is about sex to the victim. Enough to change the woman and children sex lives forever.
Children are now viciously raping other children on the school bus. Where are the learning this stuff. Movies, games and porn in the web???

I agree but that's not what I said.
 
Pornographic is sooo underrated compared to the real thing.

As far as children? Like sex, we shouldn't shield them from reality, but have a rational discussion with them when the subject comes up.
 
We know people addicted by porn.

Two kinds of addiction: physical and psychological. Physical's like heroin, cocaine, meth. Psychological addiction can be to anything including a glass of water. So in the sense than we can become psychologically addicted to anything, yes, porn is addictive. But not really. :)

Skimmed by this did ya?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...-harm-children-who-view-it-2.html#post9562722

Oh, and here I thought it'd be some silly pseudoscientific site. Glad to see it's totally reliable,
Brain Chemicals and Porn Addiction: Science Shows How Porn Harms Us

You're entitled to your opinions. I suppose, you're entitled to perpetuate nonsense too. But quackery is easy to refute, as are sites with bad science (like in previous discussions on the subject of 'do homosexuals make good parents?' and people citing 'evidence' they don't from similar religious websites and their sources for their positions which the scientific community have tossed out as invalid science.)

As to this subject, actual science as well as statistical analysis have PROVEN time and time again, that pornography availability LOWERS sexual crimes. Bans of it results in INCREASED sex crimes.

Can link to some bs fundy site all you like, but when people go to them and see sections "banning porn and lust" or w/e it said they'll know it's not a site to put any faith in (pun intended.)
 
Last edited:
Pornographic is sooo underrated compared to the real thing.

As far as children? Like sex, we shouldn't shield them from reality, but have a rational discussion with them when the subject comes up.

Have enjoyed both and I gotta say, no one ever got HIV from porn. :)
 
Pornographic is sooo underrated compared to the real thing.

As far as children? Like sex, we shouldn't shield them from reality, but have a rational discussion with them when the subject comes up.

Have enjoyed both and I gotta say, no one ever got HIV from porn. :)

Not even the ones in the porn? Are you kidding me? You only think about porn as what it does for you and what it does not do to you? Typical liberal thinking. Selfish...............
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top