Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
And their spending habits are different with a temp job than no job at all. Right? Which do you think is better for recovery?When someone is on a temporary job, their spending habits are different than when they are on a permanent job.
So hiring them for a temoproary job will drastically slow down economic growth.
Actually, no. They are identical. Someone without a job spends the little he has...be it unemployment, food stamps, welfare, lonas from family. They spend as little as they can. So do people with temporary jobs. So it will do nothing to stimulate the economy by giving them temporary jobs.
It is best to push the rpivate secotr to hire them permanently...and that is what policy needs to be geared to.
Except, policy has been like that for a decade and still no major hiring. How much more cash do companies need before they start hiring?
They dont need more cash..they need the threat of LESS cash to be off the table. And besides....there was plenty of hiring over the past decade. You look at net jobs.....you cant...you need to look at jobs that were lost by technology, (all of us complain that we can never get a human on the pohone anymore), increase in employee pool due to longer life span, l;ater retirement age and increase in population...yet the unemployment numbers did not change...of course, until the recession
You may disagree with me....thats fine....but my info comes from my career...not Fox News.....so you can debate me if you want....you are certainly worthy of it...an intelligent approach....I like that........but I happen to really know this shit.