That liberal mediaIf it does exist then The New York Times editorial staff is seriously afflicted these days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That liberal mediaIf it does exist then The New York Times editorial staff is seriously afflicted these days.
Does Clinton Derangement Syndrome Exist? Or is there something deeper at work here? The attacks on everything and anything Clinton are irrefutably irrational. So what is at work in the political sphere where seemingly rational people exhibits signs of irrationality and paranoia, whenever the Clintons are mentioned?
Supporters = RemoraThe Clinton's are sleazy opportunists that lie as easily as most people breath.
She's a misanthropic, power hungry, harridan and he's a disgraced pig with a long history of sexual misconduct.
The only derangement is from their supporters.
How do you figure that? She is provably unethical...Does Clinton Derangement Syndrome Exist? Or is there something deeper at work here? The attacks on everything and anything Clinton are irrefutably irrational. So what is at work in the political sphere where seemingly rational people exhibits signs of irrationality and paranoia, whenever the Clintons are mentioned?
jesus, you're denseSeems that the New York Times, Washington Post and Reuters should no longer be considered as valid news sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...n-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
For Clintons speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity - The Washington Post
Exclusive Clinton charities will refile tax returns audit for other errors
Too friggin funny.
.
media attacks on the Clintons that suggest things while stating there is nothing there but suspicion, paranoia...
only in the wingnutty world of the hype of Left Wing Media does it seem the media has been friends of the Clintons
There are laws regarding libel, defamation and slander. When do you think Hillary is going to file a lawsuit against those news outlets to protect her good name?
Too friggin funny.
.
Why would Hillary file a lawsuit? You may want to question your own ability to walk and chew gum -- at the same time.jesus, you're denseSeems that the New York Times, Washington Post and Reuters should no longer be considered as valid news sources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...n-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
For Clintons speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity - The Washington Post
Exclusive Clinton charities will refile tax returns audit for other errors
Too friggin funny.
.
media attacks on the Clintons that suggest things while stating there is nothing there but suspicion, paranoia...
only in the wingnutty world of the hype of Left Wing Media does it seem the media has been friends of the Clintons
There are laws regarding libel, defamation and slander. When do you think Hillary is going to file a lawsuit against those news outlets to protect her good name?
Too friggin funny.
.
So Hillary filed a lawsuit for....libel,....defamation,....slander? If she didn't you may want to question your motives in this thread.
.
It's like they walk around with clinched buttocks and soured stomachs...it manifests itself when the rw drones realize they don't have a viable candidate
And the Leftbrainers have a viable candidate? Who, pray tell?it manifests itself when the rw drones realize they don't have a viable candidate