Does anyone here understand the term "insurgent"?

[NightTrain]

Son, I've whipped you before, Jim has whipped you before, GOP Jeff has whipped you before. I'm sure there are more.

You're not nearly as smart as you seem to fancy yourself. You're outclassed and you know it.

I don't feel like getting into your silly game of semantics. I find it boring.

 

[Psychoblues]

Look, babyface, you've never whipped me nor have any of the others that you mention. Can't you give an honest answer or is that above your intelligence and intent? Now, what are you whining about?

Psychoblues

 

[OCA]

Psycho you've been pummelled on this board by many including me. Train isn't biting because he knows that if he backs you into a corner you will cut and run like the yellow bellied bastard you are. Don't say it hasn't happened, you do it on average of once a week.

 

[NewGuy]

Reading this thread makes one wonder how some people can hear groups who behead their captives claim to be muslim and be doing this in Jihad. When the koran says to do it, they do it.

What does the political structure have to do with it? As long as we aren't muslims, we are targets.

I wonder where the heads of these people are when they claim that it is a political thing.

 

[HGROKIT]

Originally posted by OCA
Psycho you've been pummelled on this board by many including me. Train isn't biting because he knows that if he backs you into a corner you will cut and run like the yellow bellied bastard you are. Don't say it hasn't happened, you do it on average of once a week.

He did it to me the first week I was on the board; in fact I think it as the first night. Can't even remember the thread - could probably find it though.

 

[OCA]

Originally posted by HGROKIT
He did it to me the first week I was on the board; in fact I think it as the first night. Can't even remember the thread - could probably find it though.

First off he thinks his trolling is actually informed thought and opinion. Secondly if you try to have an educated, adult conversation with him he gives you nothing but gibberish and backs absolutely zero of his point up with fact. Then you corner him and he logs off, thats classic Psycho.

 

[NightTrain]

Psycho you've been pummelled on this board by many including me. Train isn't biting because he knows that if he backs you into a corner you will cut and run like the yellow bellied bastard you are. Don't say it hasn't happened, you do it on average of once a week.

Yeah, OCA hit it on the head. I was just going to type up pretty much the same thing as OCA just did, but he did it MUCH more eloquently than I would have!

Very nicely worded, OCA!! LMFAO

Yep, HGROKIT, he's done it to everyone.

When he's whipped, he flees the scene.

 

[HGROKIT]

Originally posted by NightTrain
Yeah, OCA hit it on the head. I was just going to type up pretty much the same thing as OCA just did, but he did it MUCH more eloquently than I would have!

Very nicely worded, OCA!! LMFAO

Yep, HGROKIT, he's done it to everyone.

When he's whipped, he flees the scene.

Well, good! Becasue I was searching over my posts and damned if I could find it. I hadn't realized I had posted so much crap over three weeks.

 

[Comrade]

Originally posted by Psychoblues
I've been reading here for months and always questioned the term "insurgent" as applied to American opposition in Iraq. Consider that many here tend to believe that "insurgent" means some uninvited or otherwise outside force manipulating internal politics. Actually what it does mean is "rising in revolt against established authority". Herein I have a problem.

Typically, all reference to "insurgents" in the context of Iraq are included with remarks bearing reference to al Queda or other religious fundamentalist Islamists. Surely you're not impying that Islamists in general are "insurgents" anymore than our occupiers of Iraq are religious fundamentalist Christians, or are you? I don't ever recall any reference to the Shiites, Sunnis, Baathists or even the Kurds as "insurgents" before the war we now have in Iraq and there are thousands of references of pre-war vintage. How did the term "insurgent" finally enter into the equation?

I once posted an article that would entertain the reference of myself as an "insurgent" should I defend myself and my country should an outside force invade us, the USA, due to some international difference with GWB. I was immediately assured that "No, you would be a patriot." So now I find myself confused.

Considering that Iraq is now a sovereign nation ruled by a council that hasn't been democratically elected and the US has never demonstrated established authority there, what do we now call the opposition? Patriots, insurgents, malcontents, whatever. We simply must have a media friendly name for them. Don't you think?

Psychoblues

"Insurgents" is the European wire service terminology which describes any violent opposition to U.S. or Isreali influence in the Middle East.


They pretend this is part of their neutral role as reporters, as if we are somehow stupid enough to buy their stance as nuetral reporters.

After getting our load of "gunmen" who kill children in their sleep, "militants" who behead civilians in cold blood, one wonders if the "terrorists" ever really existed at all.

But foreign sponsored terror in Spain, for example, which was no different than that carried out in Iraq and done for the same purpose, suddenly convert to true terrorists, and that's not even a quoted term. You won't find one example since 9-11 where a US figure describes a terrorist without the quoted "terrorists" presentation.


A.P. and Reuters both spite U.S. efforts and make every effort to slant their reporting to reflect their rather extreme leftist bias.

Much of this has to do with the lack of a truly free press in socialist France and Germany, whose media is directly funded by the socialist state. The same goes for the BBC.

Once you understand this it's easy to pick out facts from other total crap they let into their reporting. The Arab reporters in the field write 90% total crap and their editors simply sign off on most of it.

Actually, have you ever noticed how European wire reports , especially to Yahoo, sometimes get revised after the fact when the leftist propaganda from the first posting is nauseous? Thats done for U.S. consumption only, the original is left intact for the rest of it's consumers.

They are bastards of the first order.

 

[Psychoblues]

Absolutely!!!!!!! Anything that might dispel or contradict the edicts and actions of the shrub administration is done by bastards of the first order!!!!!! Rah, rah sizboomba PS. Don't try and convince this Veteran of Foreign Wars any of that bullshit. Ever since June, 1991 (my last WAR) I require strict proof and evidence of National (United States) endangerment before I might subscribe to the submission of young and innocent American lives. I don't cotton to liars, thieves and incompetents. Unfortunately we as Americans have our share of those.

Psychoblues

 

[Comrade]

Originally posted by Psychoblues
Absolutely!!!!!!! Anything that might dispel or contradict the edicts and actions of the shrub administration is done by bastards of the first order!!!!!! Rah, rah sizboomba PS. Don't try and convince this Veteran of Foreign Wars any of that bullshit. Ever since June, 1991 (my last WAR) I require strict proof and evidence of National (United States) endangerment before I might subscribe to the submission of young and innocent American lives. I don't cotton to liars, thieves and incompetents. Unfortunately we as Americans have our share of those.

Psychoblues

Alrighty then.

 

[Comrade]

Originally posted by Psychoblues
Absolutely!!!!!!! Anything that might dispel or contradict the edicts and actions of the shrub administration is done by bastards of the first order!!!!!! Rah, rah sizboomba PS. Don't try and convince this Veteran of Foreign Wars any of that bullshit. Ever since June, 1991 (my last WAR) I require strict proof and evidence of National (United States) endangerment before I might subscribe to the submission of young and innocent American lives. I don't cotton to liars, thieves and incompetents. Unfortunately we as Americans have our share of those.

Psychoblues

FYI Psychoblues, if it's difficult for you to reconcile my opinion of A.P. editorializing especially with respect to it's Arab reporters in the field, I suggest you begin here. This typifies most of their press releases.

http://adeimantus.blogspot.com/2004/06/instant-rehabilitation-of-saddam.html

 

[JIHADTHIS]

in·sur·gent ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-sûrjnt)
adj.
Rising in revolt against established authority, especially a government.
Rebelling against the leadership of a political party.

Jihadists in Iraq are not insurgents, but you knew that already Psycho....

 

[dilloduck]

Originally posted by Psychoblues
So, based on what I'm reading so far, it would be acceptable for many of you to call me "terrorist", up to and including "dog shit" should I decide to defend my nation against a foreign agressor that had political differences with GWB? Or am I confusing the double standard? "Insurgent" is just so innocent, or don't you agree?

Psychoblues

If you decided to defend GWB against anyone I wouldn't call you anything-- I would call up the loony bin because if you did that I KNOW you've flipped your lid.