Yurt
Gold Member
its come to my attention that some on the left view congress reading the constitution into record as a solely a publicity stunt and should not be done
what say you?
what say you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
its come to my attention that some on the left view congress reading the constitution into record as a solely a publicity stunt and should not be done
what say you?
its come to my attention that some on the left view congress reading the constitution into record as a solely a publicity stunt and should not be done
what say you?
I think that the next time someone filibusters, they should read the Constitution.
In fact, if they want to filibuster long time, they should read the US Constitution and all of the other national constitutions throughout the world...then DISCUSS.
Of course it's a publicity stunt. Does that mean it's a problem? Not really. Most of what happens on the House and Senate floor is a publicity stunt for the cameras. What's one more?
I think that the next time someone filibusters, they should read the Constitution.
In fact, if they want to filibuster long time, they should read the US Constitution and all of the other national constitutions throughout the world...then DISCUSS.
I think that the next time someone filibusters, they should read the Constitution.
In fact, if they want to filibuster long time, they should read the US Constitution and all of the other national constitutions throughout the world...then DISCUSS.
Yes, well, if you must filibuster that would be the classy way to do it.
its come to my attention that some on the left view congress reading the constitution into record as a solely a publicity stunt and should not be done
what say you?
its come to my attention that some on the left view congress reading the constitution into record as a solely a publicity stunt and should not be done
what say you?
"Garrett Epps writes today that if Tea Party Republicans really listen to the Constitution, they will quickly realize that "the document they are hearing is nationalistic, not state-oriented; concerned with giving Congress power, not taking it away; forward-looking, not nostalgic for the past; aimed [at] creating a new government that can solve new problems, not freezing in place an old one that must fold its hands while the nation declines." So long as there are fair-minded judges on the bench, the Constitution will be read for what it actually says, and not what any one results-oriented group or faction wants it to be."