Documented evidence of OBAMA'S THIRD PARTY SOCIALIST PARTY TIE

[The Infidel]

Well, where are all his defenders?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg]Cricket Sound - YouTube[/ame]

 

[DiamondDave]

Obama’s Third-Party History - Stanley Kurtz - National Review Online

I guess Obama (and/or his crew) is caught in a lie in relation to assertions he made during his last campaign. Looks like he is indeed tied to and was a member of the socialist/communist 'New Party', despite his denials in 2008.

Thoughts?? Anyone think this could be an issue during the upcoming election?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

In all seriousness...even if this is 100% accurate...this will not change the mind of a single rube.

 

[DiamondDave]

Not saying that I think extremist leftists (like TDM, wrongwinger, etc) would be swayed by this if indeed completely accurate... But do you think this could have an effect of independents, undecideds, etc?? If he is directly tied to a socialist party/organization that he and his cohorts completely denied having ties to, will it be a big enough deal to make a swing in the election?

 

[daveman]

To the USMB Obama supporters:

Obama lied to you. He didn't misspeak, he didn't make a mistake, nothing was taken out of context.

He lied to you.

But you just keep pretending this thread doesn't exist.

 

[SniperFire]

Obama lied to the public about his party membership.

This is a serious betrayal of the public trust.

'While Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party, print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.

The party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”

The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”

The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.'

Obama just caught in big lie?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Not saying that I think extremist leftists (like TDM, wrongwinger, etc) would be swayed by this if indeed completely accurate... But do you think this could have an effect of independents, undecideds, etc?? If he is directly tied to a socialist party/organization that he and his cohorts completely denied having ties to, will it be a big enough deal to make a swing in the election?

Absolutely it would if it is accurate and...this is the big one....the MSM reports it.
If the only people that report the story is conservative media then it will do nothing but preach to the choir. In order to reach the independents and swing voters the regular media will have to report it...which is unlikely. They are unapologetic in their support for Obama.
Think about it. The only reason all of this kind of stuff never saw the light in 2008 was because the McCain camp refused to go negative...so only the conservative media covered any of it. It really depends on what the Romney camp will do in September. If they make an issue of this kind of stuff - then and only then will the MSM report on it - and even then it will either be short at the end of the show...or they will invite liberal guest who will refute it with no guest to refute them.

 

[The Infidel]

Not saying that I think extremist leftists (like TDM, wrongwinger, etc) would be swayed by this if indeed completely accurate... But do you think this could have an effect of independents, undecideds, etc?? If he is directly tied to a socialist party/organization that he and his cohorts completely denied having ties to, will it be a big enough deal to make a swing in the election?

Absolutely it would if it is accurate and...this is the big one....the MSM reports it.
If the only people that report the story is conservative media then it will do nothing but preach to the choir. In order to reach the independents and swing voters the regular media will have to report it...which is unlikely. They are unapologetic in their support for Obama.
Think about it. The only reason all of this kind of stuff never saw the light in 2008 was because the McCain camp refused to go negative...so only the conservative media covered any of it. It really depends on what the Romney camp will do in September. If they make an issue of this kind of stuff - then and only then will the MSM report on it - and even then it will either be short at the end of the show...or they will invite liberal guest who will refute it with no guest to refute them.

This is key... IF it were reported as it should be.

Its important because the citizenry needs to know if their leaders are willing to lie to their faces.

Sadly it seems the left does not care...

 

[The T]

Not saying that I think extremist leftists (like TDM, wrongwinger, etc) would be swayed by this if indeed completely accurate... But do you think this could have an effect of independents, undecideds, etc?? If he is directly tied to a socialist party/organization that he and his cohorts completely denied having ties to, will it be a big enough deal to make a swing in the election?

Absolutely it would if it is accurate and...this is the big one....the MSM reports it.
If the only people that report the story is conservative media then it will do nothing but preach to the choir. In order to reach the independents and swing voters the regular media will have to report it...which is unlikely. They are unapologetic in their support for Obama.
Think about it. The only reason all of this kind of stuff never saw the light in 2008 was because the McCain camp refused to go negative...so only the conservative media covered any of it. It really depends on what the Romney camp will do in September. If they make an issue of this kind of stuff - then and only then will the MSM report on it - and even then it will either be short at the end of the show...or they will invite liberal guest who will refute it with no guest to refute them.

This is key... IF it were reported as it should be.

Its important because the citizenry needs to know if their leaders are willing to lie to their faces.

Sadly it seems the left does not care...

If it serves thier purpose to shield Obama...Why should they? They know the truth. I wonder what it is like for them to live a giant lie?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Progressives have always embraced candidates that flirt with Socialist/Marxist/Communist ideology...........It takes a village !!!

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Progressives have always embraced candidates that flirt with Socialist/Marxist/Communist ideology...........It takes a village !!!

they don't just flirt.....they're engaged to be married.....

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Progressives have always embraced candidates that flirt with Socialist/Marxist/Communist ideology...........It takes a village !!!

they don't just flirt.....they're engaged to be married.....

Indeed the old whores have been in bed together for decades and will defend themselves to the bitter end...........Just dont call them socialists !!!

Its capitalism thats the demon...........LOL

 

[The Infidel]

Progressives have always embraced candidates that flirt with Socialist/Marxist/Communist ideology...........It takes a village !!!

they don't just flirt.....they're engaged to be married.....

Indeed the old whores have been in bed together for decades and will defend themselves to the bitter end...........Just dont call them socialists !!!

Its capitalism thats the demon...........LOL

The cant deny it any longer... there is proof now.

Hence their absence in this thread.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

But leftist bureaucrats and central planning experts are for the "public good" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why cant those independent, small govt, low tax, liberty seeking rednecks understand whats in their best interest ? lol

 

[daveman]

Absolutely it would if it is accurate and...this is the big one....the MSM reports it.
If the only people that report the story is conservative media then it will do nothing but preach to the choir. In order to reach the independents and swing voters the regular media will have to report it...which is unlikely. They are unapologetic in their support for Obama.
Think about it. The only reason all of this kind of stuff never saw the light in 2008 was because the McCain camp refused to go negative...so only the conservative media covered any of it. It really depends on what the Romney camp will do in September. If they make an issue of this kind of stuff - then and only then will the MSM report on it - and even then it will either be short at the end of the show...or they will invite liberal guest who will refute it with no guest to refute them.

This is key... IF it were reported as it should be.

Its important because the citizenry needs to know if their leaders are willing to lie to their faces.

Sadly it seems the left does not care...

If it serves thier purpose to shield Obama...Why should they? They know the truth. I wonder what it is like for them to live a giant lie?

It's magical thinking. What they WANT to be true, IS true.

That's what happens when you operate solely on emotion.

 

[daveman]

Now 25 posts, 174 views.

They know this thread is here. They haven't gotten their talking points handed to them yet on how to deal with it.

Essentially, the refutation will boil down to "Nuh-UHHHH!!"

 

[The T]

This is key... IF it were reported as it should be.

Its important because the citizenry needs to know if their leaders are willing to lie to their faces.

Sadly it seems the left does not care...

If it serves thier purpose to shield Obama...Why should they? They know the truth. I wonder what it is like for them to live a giant lie?

It's magical thinking. What they WANT to be true, IS true.

That's what happens when you operate solely on emotion.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooM-RGUTe2E]The Wizard of Oz - "There's No Place Like Home" Magic Spell - YouTube[/ame]

 

[The T]

But leftist bureaucrats and central planning experts are for the "public good" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why cant those independent, small govt, low tax, liberty seeking rednecks understand whats in their best interest ? lol

Theyjust get underfoot because they know responsibility?

 

[Jroc]

Today’s Democrat party, socialists? what’s the difference? They’ve taken over that party anyway.

 

[The Infidel]

Damn this thread is just a conservative echo chamber...chamber...chamber....chamber