Do something or stop complaining.

Not the editorial page, you ignorant father fucker.
Yes it is as I have already explained. What in the world would make you think the Murdoch's would allow a paper they own to write editorials against their beliefs?
 
Your analysis is that of a retarded person.
Every Saturday and Sunday, three editorial page writers and host Paul Gigot, editor of the Editorial Page, appear on Fox News Channel's Journal Editorial Report to discuss current issues with a variety of guests. As editors of the editorial page, Vermont C. Royster (served 1958–1971) and Robert L. Bartley (served 1972–2000) were especially influential in providing a conservative interpretation of the news on a daily basis.[2]
 

That bill was simply Trump's codified Trump's failed policy on the Southern Border.

When Trump first took office, illegal border crossings were at a 50 year low and nobody would give him money for a wall if the border was secure. So Trump set out to create a crisis at the Southern Border, cancelling foreign aid to fight the gangs, and increasing violence in their home countries.

By 2019, illegal crossings spiked so high, Trump declared a National Emergency at the Southern Border, after he completely dismanted all of the imigration courts and immigration support services along the Southern Border.



Obama cut illegal immigration by prosecuting employers, as did Clinton. Both were more successful that any Republican President at reducing illegal crossings.
 
The WSJ is calling the Repub's bluff.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board urged Republicans in Congress on Sunday to reach a deal on border security rather than saving the issue as a campaign matter.

“As for House Republicans, they promised in 2022 to do something about the migrant surge, and here is their opening,” the editorial board wrote on Sunday. “It’s not as if they have much else to tout when they campaign for re-election. If they won’t accept this rare chance at incremental progress, voters can fairly conclude that Republicans want to exploit the border election after election without actually solving the problem.”


One of the main criticisms of POT politics over the last few decades is their propensity to put the party's electoral chances above what is good for the country. The prime example being their use of illegal immigration at the southern border as a cudgel against Dems. Well, here's there chance to make some incremental progress in advancing immigration reform. I hope they use the chance to get something done.

It is a fact that ReNaziKlans voted down funding for border security, right before they left for photo-op at the border.
 
And a continuation of low wage workers for those corporations that donate heavily to said campaigns.
Keep the gravy train movin along.
White-Collar White Replacement

The H1-Bs also undercut Americans' salaries. Until our unnatural and unmotivating college "education" is replaced by paid professional training, the cheapskate economic bullies will always have the excuse that there is a shortage of qualified Americans for those positions.
 
That bill was simply Trump's codified Trump's failed policy on the Southern Border.

When Trump first took office, illegal border crossings were at a 50 year low and nobody would give him money for a wall if the border was secure. So Trump set out to create a crisis at the Southern Border, cancelling foreign aid to fight the gangs, and increasing violence in their home countries.

By 2019, illegal crossings spiked so high, Trump declared a National Emergency at the Southern Border, after he completely dismanted all of the imigration courts and immigration support services along the Southern Border.



Obama cut illegal immigration by prosecuting employers, as did Clinton. Both were more successful that any Republican President at reducing illegal crossings.
Trump's hysteria over the border shows how vital it is and has been for some time that Repubs gin up outrage by the base to keep hate alive. It's what keeps them coming back to the voting booth.
 
Billie,

Either your jeans are too tight or you have inferior genes. Now it's time to go out and play.

You are simply fucked in the head.
Murdock supported Hillary, that's not in dispute.
He's not conservative, he saw a market that The Democrat Media Bubble Cult was not tapping in to.
He made money.
He is a left wing lunatic, like you.
I doubt that he is as insane as you.
His sons probably are.
 
You are simply fucked in the head.
Murdock supported Hillary, that's not in dispute.
He's not conservative, he saw a market that The Democrat Media Bubble Cult was not tapping in to.
He made money.
He is a left wing lunatic, like you.
I doubt that he is as insane as you.
His sons probably are.
What alternate reality do you live in? Are there really unicorns there? :)

Of course Rupert Murdoch is dyed in the wool conservative. Why the fuck do you think he created Fox News in 1996? As a conservative alternative to his perception of a liberal bias in the media. Yeah he made money. A shit ton of it. No..he did NOT support Hillary Clinton. He supported Donald Trump. :auiqs.jpg:
Well, after it was clear Trump was gonna be the nominee. :)
 
What alternate reality do you live in? Are there really unicorns there? :)

Of course Rupert Murdoch is dyed in the wool conservative. Why the fuck do you think he created Fox News in 1996? As a conservative alternative to his perception of a liberal bias in the media. Yeah he made money. A shit ton of it. No..he did NOT support Hillary Clinton. He supported Donald Trump. :auiqs.jpg:
Well, after it was clear Trump was gonna be the nominee. :)

To make money.

The fucking alternate universe that you stupid mother fuckers live in.
 

Forum List

Back
Top