It's not a "tough bill" by any rational measure....It's a classic GOP bait-and-switch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's not a "tough bill" by any rational measure....It's a classic GOP bait-and-switch.
OWNED BY FOX MEDIA? CHECK YOUR SELF,The WSJ editorial board is comprised of Left-Wing Lunatics, as are all editorial boards.
Every Saturday and Sunday, three editorial page writers and host Paul Gigot, editor of the Editorial Page, appear on Fox News Channel's Journal Editorial Report to discuss current issues with a variety of guests. As editors of the editorial page, Vermont C. Royster (served 1958–1971) and Robert L. Bartley (served 1972–2000) were especially influential in providing a conservative interpretation of the news on a daily basis.[2]Your analysis is that of a retarded person.
Yes it is as I have already explained. What in the world would make you think the Murdoch's would allow a paper they own to write editorials against their beliefs?
It's a bill that's not going anywhere and only serves as red meat to the maga fascist base.It's not a "tough bill" by any rational measure....It's a classic GOP bait-and-switch.
The WSJ is calling the Repub's bluff.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board urged Republicans in Congress on Sunday to reach a deal on border security rather than saving the issue as a campaign matter.
“As for House Republicans, they promised in 2022 to do something about the migrant surge, and here is their opening,” the editorial board wrote on Sunday. “It’s not as if they have much else to tout when they campaign for re-election. If they won’t accept this rare chance at incremental progress, voters can fairly conclude that Republicans want to exploit the border election after election without actually solving the problem.”
WSJ editorial board calls on Republicans to reach a border deal
“As for House Republicans, they promised in 2022 to do something about the migrant surge, and here is their opening,” the WSJ editorial board wrote.www.politico.com
One of the main criticisms of POT politics over the last few decades is their propensity to put the party's electoral chances above what is good for the country. The prime example being their use of illegal immigration at the southern border as a cudgel against Dems. Well, here's there chance to make some incremental progress in advancing immigration reform. I hope they use the chance to get something done.
He's just a little white boi looking for purpose.Billie,
Either your jeans are too tight or you have inferior genes. Now it's time to go out and play.
White-Collar White ReplacementAnd a continuation of low wage workers for those corporations that donate heavily to said campaigns.
Keep the gravy train movin along.
Trump's hysteria over the border shows how vital it is and has been for some time that Repubs gin up outrage by the base to keep hate alive. It's what keeps them coming back to the voting booth.That bill was simply Trump's codified Trump's failed policy on the Southern Border.
When Trump first took office, illegal border crossings were at a 50 year low and nobody would give him money for a wall if the border was secure. So Trump set out to create a crisis at the Southern Border, cancelling foreign aid to fight the gangs, and increasing violence in their home countries.
By 2019, illegal crossings spiked so high, Trump declared a National Emergency at the Southern Border, after he completely dismanted all of the imigration courts and immigration support services along the Southern Border.
Border crossing encounters U.S. 1990-2022 | Statista
The number of illegal border crossings reached an all-time high in 2022, with over 2.2 million migrant encounters registered by the U.S. Border Patrol.www.statista.com
Trump Declares a National Emergency, and Provokes a Constitutional Clash (Published 2019)
The president’s decision incited instant condemnation from Democrats, who called it an unconstitutional abuse of his authority and vowed to overturn it with Republican support.www.nytimes.com
Obama cut illegal immigration by prosecuting employers, as did Clinton. Both were more successful that any Republican President at reducing illegal crossings.
He's just a little white boi looking for purpose.
Billie,
Either your jeans are too tight or you have inferior genes. Now it's time to go out and play.
Welcome to alternate realityNone of the Murdoch family is conservative you silly little bitch.
Your words are stupid.Welcome to alternate reality
Your words are simple.Your words are stupid.
What alternate reality do you live in? Are there really unicorns there?You are simply fucked in the head.
Murdock supported Hillary, that's not in dispute.
He's not conservative, he saw a market that The Democrat Media Bubble Cult was not tapping in to.
He made money.
He is a left wing lunatic, like you.
I doubt that he is as insane as you.
His sons probably are.
So you get nothing....Good day sir!Nobody could ever build a working wall on this border.
It was a ridiculous idea told to ridiculous people stupid enough to believe it.
What alternate reality do you live in? Are there really unicorns there?
Of course Rupert Murdoch is dyed in the wool conservative. Why the fuck do you think he created Fox News in 1996? As a conservative alternative to his perception of a liberal bias in the media. Yeah he made money. A shit ton of it. No..he did NOT support Hillary Clinton. He supported Donald Trump.
Well, after it was clear Trump was gonna be the nominee.