Do something or stop complaining.

[DigitalDrifter]

I don't know why we need more judges, just use AI to process claims based on the law at point of entry. If illegals don't have any identification documents they need to be sent back.
How are they vetting these people coming over when most have no form of identification.
I sure hope Abbot is documenting the illegals he's shipping all over the country so they can be easily deported, because people do realize they can be shipped out of the dem cities to red states just as easily as they were shipped in.

Why should Abbott do a goddamned thing? Joe Biden is the idiot who has started this entire crisis!

 

[berg80]

Right on cue............................................

Biden promises to veto any House GOP bill on border enforcement​

Biden promises to veto any House GOP bill on border enforcement

The White House says President Joe Biden would veto a House GOP bill that aims to restrict asylum, build more border wall and cut a program that allows migrants a chance to stay in the U.S. lawfully.

www.pbs.org

You're making this too easy. From your linked article........

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden would veto a House GOP bill that aims to restrict asylum, build more border wall and cut a program that allows migrants a chance to stay in the U.S., including Ukrainian refugees, the White House said Monday.

Passing a bill that The Crazy knows is unacceptable isn't governing. It's a publicity stunt.

 

[otto105]

The WSJ editorial board is comprised of Left-Wing Lunatics, as are all editorial boards.

Goddamn, another motherfucking victim.


Dark Brandon knows you're a wimpy little fuck.

 

[otto105]

Why should Abbott do a goddamned thing? Joe Biden is the idiot who has started this entire crisis!

Yeah, way would you fuckups give up your only issue for this year's election for the good of the country.

 

[Lesh]

The WSJ editorial board is comprised of Left-Wing Lunatics, as are all editorial boards.

WSJ is a right wing paper jackass

 

[BackAgain]

There's a difference between ending Trump's inhumane policies and asking for a surge. But I can see you are not open to having a rational discussion.

Trump’s policies were not inhumane. That’s just cheap and dishonest crappy propaganda.

Potato has indeed done everything he can to practically insist on a surge.
Your denial of these things demonstrates that it is you who chooses to forego any rational discussion.

 

[otto105]

Trump’s policies were not inhumane. That’s just cheap and dishonest crappy propaganda.

Potato has indeed done everything he can to practically insist on a surge.
Your denial of these things demonstrates that it is you who chooses to forego any rational discussion.

Hilarious fuckup

 

[Foxfyre]

The WSJ is calling the Repub's bluff.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board urged Republicans in Congress on Sunday to reach a deal on border security rather than saving the issue as a campaign matter.

“As for House Republicans, they promised in 2022 to do something about the migrant surge, and here is their opening,” the editorial board wrote on Sunday. “It’s not as if they have much else to tout when they campaign for re-election. If they won’t accept this rare chance at incremental progress, voters can fairly conclude that Republicans want to exploit the border election after election without actually solving the problem.”

WSJ editorial board calls on Republicans to reach a border deal

“As for House Republicans, they promised in 2022 to do something about the migrant surge, and here is their opening,” the WSJ editorial board wrote.

www.politico.com

One of the main criticisms of POT politics over the last few decades is their propensity to put the party's electoral chances above what is good for the country. The prime example being their use of illegal immigration at the southern border as a cudgel against Dems. Well, here's there chance to make some incremental progress in advancing immigration reform. I hope they use the chance to get something done.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republicans-ready-tough-border-control-bill-us-house-passage-2023-05-11/

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Hilarious fuckup

Joe Biden is the fuckup you mean!

Biden in 2019: The Fact​

A video clipping of Biden speaking at a debate prior to general elections in 2019 clearly shows him say, 'Surge the borders.' "I would in fact make sure that there is immediately a surge to the border. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. "We're a nation that says, 'You want to flee, and you're fleeing oppression, you should come,'" Biden had told during a debate moderated by Univision's Jorge Ramos in 2019.

 

[Dragonlady]

The WSJ editorial board is comprised of Left-Wing Lunatics, as are all editorial boards.

Knee jerk response from a Trump Cult member who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the grounnd.

The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and has always been a right wing publication.

 

[berg80]

Trump’s policies were not inhumane.

How quickly you forget.

SAN DIEGO (AP) — The federal government would be barred from immigration policies that separate parents from children for eight years under a proposed court settlement announced Monday that also provides families that were split under the Trump administration with temporary legal status and short-term housing aid.

The settlement between the Biden administration and the American Civil Liberties Union, if approved by a judge, would at least temporarily prohibit the type of “zero-tolerance” policy on illegal immigration under which former President Donald Trump separated thousands of families at the border with Mexico.

Settlement over Trump-era family separations at the border limits future separations for 8 years

The agreement announced Monday also provides families that were split under the Trump administration with temporary legal status and short-term housing aid.

www.pbs.org

 

[berg80]

Knee jerk response from a Trump Cult member who doesn't know his ass from a hole in the grounnd.

The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and has always been a right wing publication.

Thanks. I already made that point. Not that it will do any good for those who refuse to accept demonstrable truths.

 

[Billiejeens]

WSJ is a right wing paper jackass

Not the editorial page, you ignorant father fucker.

 

[otto105]

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republicans-ready-tough-border-control-bill-us-house-passage-2023-05-11/

Just passing the house means nothing to actually legislating.

 

[MagicMike]

Biden needs to ask for money to finish building the border wall to show he's serious.

Nobody could ever build a working wall on this border.
It was a ridiculous idea told to ridiculous people stupid enough to believe it.

 

[Lesh]

Not the editorial page, you ignorant father fucker.

And the editorial page is no more left leaning than the rest of the paper

Jackass

 

[BackAgain]

How quickly you forget.

SAN DIEGO (AP) — The federal government would be barred from immigration policies that separate parents from children for eight years under a proposed court settlement announced Monday that also provides families that were split under the Trump administration with temporary legal status and short-term housing aid.

The settlement between the Biden administration and the American Civil Liberties Union, if approved by a judge, would at least temporarily prohibit the type of “zero-tolerance” policy on illegal immigration under which former President Donald Trump separated thousands of families at the border with Mexico.

Settlement over Trump-era family separations at the border limits future separations for 8 years

The agreement announced Monday also provides families that were split under the Trump administration with temporary legal status and short-term housing aid.

www.pbs.org

You buy lots of stupid propaganda.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The WSJ editorial board is comprises Left-Wing Lunatics, as are all editorial boards.

Ideology Is a Spitball-Fight Performance Presented by the Prep Schools

The Left is a partner of the Right and always has been.

 

[otto105]

Not the editorial page, you ignorant father fucker.

Fuckup the editorial page is where the WSJ rapid conservative views are displayed.

Or are you a victim too.

 

[Billiejeens]

And the editorial page is no more left leaning than the rest of the paper

Jackass

Your analysis is that of a retarded person.