Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength

[Unkotare]

....
The US is very young ....

No, it's not.

 

[Asclepias]

Of course it's a strength. It's even a strength at the biological level. Gene diversity creates more attractive people, stronger immune systems, healthier people, etc.

As usual, you haven't got the slightest clue of what you're babbling about. You're just a muppet, no original thoughts of your own. Most likely caused by a lack of gene diversity in your family tree...

Aren't liberals the ones who tell us that the Indians ("native Americans") were better off before whitey? This the standard liberal double standard?

Oh, you mean before we forced them in to the worst lands in the country?

How were we able to do that if we are so inferior?

guns?

. Uh oh, and that is why groups want the guns banned in the country ?? What, so they fear a repeat coming ?

There will be no repeats. I got guns too and better training than any straw sucking yahoo that wants to get some.

 

[Asclepias]

True diversity, when people of different races and gender work together and it seems so normal nobody gives it a second thought.

. The word diversity has been used as a hammer by those seeking political power in this country, and the wanting to change the country big time into what they see it fit for. The pushing of diversity has been a created code that allows them to musle in to areas (by way of government force), and to change those areas or minds by government force. The problem is that it has moved beyond the eraddication of racism, and on to now being used to erradicate cultures, characters, religious views, time honored traditions, and etc.

Fuck your traditions of genocide, lying, thievery, and hero worship of inbred racists. You cant stop whats coming. Get used to it.

 

[Asclepias]

Your backtracking is making you look like a fool.

in other words, it's an accurate representation

What a fool like that doesn't understand is that rights in the context he's referring to are rights that governments are supposed to secure.

He wants our government to protect his right to refuse to hire a black person, or a gay person, otherwise best qualified for a job,
simply because he's bigoted against blacks and gays, or in some other sense doesn't want them around.

And he thinks that's what our Constitution was meant for.

Which is precisely what the government should do. When it guarantees the freedom of association; it was written with the intent of allowing people to freely congregate at will. What was never written nor intended by the phrase “freedom of association”, was the forcing against ones will, the association with those, one would rather avoid. That’s where the “freedom” part comes into play. Both parties must be acting of their own free will. Why do you hate freedom?

Since laws against discrimination are repeatedly held up as CONSTITUTIONAL, you don't know what you're talking about.

Court decisions are always up for revisiting. Nor are they always correct. If they were your beloved “civil rights” movements court decisions would have been thrown out at the filing stage.

Isnt it enough you got 400 years of affirmative action? Now you want to bring Jim Crow back so you dont have to compete against better qualified people? Youre such and abysmal failure as a man. Stop begging for more handouts.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Your backtracking is making you look like a fool.

in other words, it's an accurate representation

What a fool like that doesn't understand is that rights in the context he's referring to are rights that governments are supposed to secure.

He wants our government to protect his right to refuse to hire a black person, or a gay person, otherwise best qualified for a job,
simply because he's bigoted against blacks and gays, or in some other sense doesn't want them around.

And he thinks that's what our Constitution was meant for.

Which is precisely what the government should do. When it guarantees the freedom of association; it was written with the intent of allowing people to freely congregate at will. What was never written nor intended by the phrase “freedom of association”, was the forcing against ones will, the association with those, one would rather avoid. That’s where the “freedom” part comes into play. Both parties must be acting of their own free will. Why do you hate freedom?

Since laws against discrimination are repeatedly held up as CONSTITUTIONAL, you don't know what you're talking about.

Court decisions are always up for revisiting. Nor are they always correct. If they were your beloved “civil rights” movements court decisions would have been thrown out at the filing stage.

Why would a rightwing extremist like you be any credible judge of what the Constitution means?

 

[Unkotare]

Aren't liberals the ones who tell us that the Indians ("native Americans") were better off before whitey? This the standard liberal double standard?

Oh, you mean before we forced them in to the worst lands in the country?

How were we able to do that if we are so inferior?

guns?

. Uh oh, and that is why groups want the guns banned in the country ?? What, so they fear a repeat coming ?

There will be no repeats. I got guns too and better training than any straw sucking yahoo that wants to get some.

Another supahahdguy!

 

[Desperado]

Diversity is only a strength when it comes to your portfolio

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

. Didn't Hitler consider himself a Christian or a follower of the religion by mouth, but not by his actions ?

According to Albert Speer, Hitler preferred Islam over Christianity.

. Christianity wasn't violent enough for him eh ?

Well, I personally don't believe it's religion, so much as savage ethnic groups which cause mayhem.

 

[Issa]

Show me one high grossing movie that has been produced without the assistance of people of color. Just one. Music was invented by Black people. Whites only have invented technology after stealing the inventions of Blacks. Thats why there were laws against Blacks getting patents.

Most movies were made without the assisance of black people until the 1970s. That is, unless your counting the guy cleaning the bathrooms.

The Moors sweetheart, brought the Europeans out of the dark ages. Gave them science, hospitals, public baths ( they were filthy), gave them algebra (without it you can do shit), music, medicine, ect....basically they made civilised and the Europeans capitalized on that. Go to South of Europe, visit Granada, Seville, Cordoba, to know more about how superior the moors were.

That's total bullshit. Europeans didn't start taking baths until the 19th Century. They had science, music, medicine.

They must not have been very suprior since the Spanish pushed them out of Spain.

You have no clue about history sorry to say. If you just can afford to go to southern Europe and see the baths, gardens, water system, hospitals, universities ect ....that the moors built you won't be spewing nonsense.

The golden age. The jews did the the brainwork and artistry in exchange for being allowed to live fairly well under muslim rule. They were still subservient to muslims. Muslims invented very little throught their conquests. Rape, pillage, plunder is what they were about. They became strong in ruling the seas because they used the seagoing technology gained from the european, mostly british seamen, they captured on their raids. Rape, pillage, plunder is what muslims do. One reason Columbus was trying to find a route to the orient was due to the muslim raids on the caravans in the trade between east and west . That's how that raping and plundering dog muhammed made his bones...raiding caravans. Islam has been a net minus throughout history.

The Jews? lol....Avicenna was Jewish? Averroes? Ibn Arabi? Abbas Ibn Farnass? Al Farabi? and so many more....that developed medicine, Physics, Math, Philosophy, Music, Aviation, and so many other things....yes Jews were also the fabric of the Islamic empire and they were like any other citizens, they contributed in science, industry, etc....in fact when The Christians forced them to convert along the Muslims they fled to Muslim countries, The likes of Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Turkey of today....

Dude The coffee is Arabic, The camera is an Arabic Word and thanks to Ibn Al haitam who invented the first pin-hole camera...The muslims of Persia that developed Chess that we all play now. Abbas Ibn Farnas was the first man who tried to Parachute and fly and that was a thousand years before the Wright brothers. Muslims introduced Saops, champoos to Europe along with baths and other hygienic essentials. It was Jabir ibn Hayyan, who transformed alchemy into chemistry, inventing many of the basic processes and apparatus still in use today - liquefaction, crystallisation, distillation, purification, oxidisation, evaporation and filtration. As well as discovering sulphuric and nitric acid, he invented the alembic still, giving the world intense rosewater and other perfumes and alcoholic spirits

The crank-shaft is a device which translates rotary into linear motion and is central to much of the machinery in the modern world, not least the internal combustion engine. One of the most important mechanical inventions in the history of humankind, it was created by an ingenious Muslim engineer called al-Jazari to raise water for irrigation.

The pointed arch so characteristic of Europe's Gothic cathedrals was an invention borrowed from Islamic architecture.

Many modern surgical instruments are of exactly the same design as those devised in the 10th century by a Muslim surgeon called al-Zahrawi. His scalpels, bone saws, forceps, fine scissors for eye surgery and many of the 200 instruments he devised are recognisable to a modern surgeon.

The system of numbering in use all round the world is probably Indian in origin but the style of the numerals is Arabic and first appears in print in the work of the Muslim mathematicians al-Khwarizmi and al-Kindi around 825. Algebra was named after al-Khwarizmi's book, Al-Jabr wa-al-Muqabilah, much of whose contents are still in use.

The modern cheque comes from the Arabic saqq, a written vow to pay for goods when they were delivered, to avoid money having to be transported across dangerous terrain


British Seamen? Dude if you went to school here in the US and studied in history I have to tell you that didn't teach you the whole thing.

Muslims were years ahead of the Europeans at all levels, they clearly brought them out from the dark ages, one shouldnt be ashamed to recognize that....because Muslims themselves picked up from other civilizations and made things better for humanity.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Of course it's a strength. It's even a strength at the biological level. Gene diversity creates more attractive people, stronger immune systems, healthier people, etc.

As usual, you haven't got the slightest clue of what you're babbling about. You're just a muppet, no original thoughts of your own. Most likely caused by a lack of gene diversity in your family tree...

Although I generally disagree with the nonsense from the left, SYTFE does have a valid argument. Diversity in most cases is better than a non diversified group. It’s true in most systems.

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off earlier, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

 

[Asclepias]

Of course it's a strength. It's even a strength at the biological level. Gene diversity creates more attractive people, stronger immune systems, healthier people, etc.

As usual, you haven't got the slightest clue of what you're babbling about. You're just a muppet, no original thoughts of your own. Most likely caused by a lack of gene diversity in your family tree...

Although I generally disagree with the nonsense from the left, SYTFE does have a valid argument. Diversity in most cases is better than a non diversified group. It’s true in most systems.

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate. Come on. Melanin is good for yall.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Of course it's a strength. It's even a strength at the biological level. Gene diversity creates more attractive people, stronger immune systems, healthier people, etc.

As usual, you haven't got the slightest clue of what you're babbling about. You're just a muppet, no original thoughts of your own. Most likely caused by a lack of gene diversity in your family tree...

Although I generally disagree with the nonsense from the left, SYTFE does have a valid argument. Diversity in most cases is better than a non diversified group. It’s true in most systems.

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the Humans of this World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

 

[Issa]

Although I generally disagree with the nonsense from the left, SYTFE does have a valid argument. Diversity in most cases is better than a non diversified group. It’s true in most systems.

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

Can you call a black man Negro to his face? I wanna see you do that.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

Can you call a black man Negro to his face? I wanna see you do that.

One young Black punk in the Jefferson Valley mall, mocked me for how I dressed which was like a Metal-head, so I called him a Negro, and pushed him.
Nothing happened, but he cowered in fear.

However, another Black punk in O'Conners pub in Brewster New York, said "I'll knock you out fat N*gger" so I called him a N"gger back, so I had 8 of them attack me.

Sissiest punches I've ever experienced.

However, there were so many of them I was forced to flee.

 

[Dragonlady]

And yet statistics show that the more diversity you have, the more successful your economy. The most successful economies are ones where women share power with men. The least successful are those where women are marginalized have no power.

The more points of view you have, the more ideas you have. Different cultures, races and ethnicities bring a diverse set of ideas and traditions to the business world.

I lived in one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world for 30 years. Now I live in a homogenous white Christian rural community. The closest thing to "ethnic" cuisine in this town is an Italian pasta restaurant. I've been learning to cook Indian food because I miss it, and don't get me started on Asian cuisine. I'm currently on the lookout for a good Pad Thai recipe because I miss Thai food and sushi.

Just as the WASP diet is fairly boring, so are the business ideas in a predominantly white European culture. Innovation comes from looking at things from differing perspectives. Non-white immigrant co-workers in the city were an incredible resource base of new ideas and points of view that aren't available where I live now. I miss having those resources.

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

You're quoting a blog which uses an example from a television show about a zombie apocalypse to make political point about diversity???? Are you really that stupid??

As for Republican Presidents having Democrats in cabinet, and vice versa, it happens all of the time, and quite successfully too, going back to George Washington and continuing to President Obama.

List of United States political appointments across party lines - Wikipedia

There really is no cure for stupid.

You're proof of that. There's nothing stupider than communism, yet you are all for it.

The source of the information isn't relevant. You can accept the argument on it's merits or not. You have done nothing to discredit it except resort to logical fallacies.

In George Washington's day it wasn't nearly so dangerous because at least the parties had the same goal: the welfare of the United States. However these days one of the parties is intent on destroying this country and enslaving eveyrone in it.

You're the one with the flawed and irrevelants arguments here. For example, you claim I'm in favour of communism when there's absolutely no evidence that I am nor have I ever made any statements to that effect. If your only argument against what I've posted is an out and out lie, it doesn't say much for your ideas does it?

The only people who fear diversity are those who are so inferior that they are unable to compete with the new ideas and experiences of a more diverse pool of workers. Racism is based on fear and the inferiority of those who know they can't compete on a level playing field. That's why they seek to exclude as many people as possible from the pool of applicants available.

Your racism and fear of diversity is proof positive of your own inferiority.

The statistics show precisely the opposite. Japan is a very successful country and the least "diverse" on the entire planet. Look at all the successful countries in Europe. They didn't get that way with a "diverse" population.

"Diversity" means crime, civil strife, a vast welfare burden, lack of community cohesiveness, the list goes on and on.

Japan is a very good example. What was the last great Japanese invention? Name it! They've existing technologies but original ideas are in short supply.

The Japanese don't invent things. The homogenous nature of their culture doesn't adapt quickly or well. There is a paucity of new ideas and thinking even as their education system is one of the best in the world.

The golden age of American invention and ingenuity took place in the late 1800's and early 1900's when immigration was at it's peak and unrestricted. All of those new and fresh ideas from all over the world coming together for the first time.

 

[Issa]

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

Can you call a black man Negro to his face? I wanna see you do that.

One young Black punk in the Jefferson Valley mall, mocked me for how I dressed which was like a Metal-head, so I called him a Negro, and pushed him.
Nothing happened, but he cowered in fear.

However, another Black punk in O'Conners pub in Brewster New York, said "I'll knock you out fat N*gger" so I called him a N"gger back, so I had 8 of them attack me.

Sissiest punches I've ever experienced.

However, there were so many of them I was forced to flee.

That's what i thought....you got your ass kicked twice, and the only time you go away with it...the kid was young. Typical coward in my book.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

And yet statistics show that the more diversity you have, the more successful your economy. The most successful economies are ones where women share power with men. The least successful are those where women are marginalized have no power.

The more points of view you have, the more ideas you have. Different cultures, races and ethnicities bring a diverse set of ideas and traditions to the business world.

I lived in one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world for 30 years. Now I live in a homogenous white Christian rural community. The closest thing to "ethnic" cuisine in this town is an Italian pasta restaurant. I've been learning to cook Indian food because I miss it, and don't get me started on Asian cuisine. I'm currently on the lookout for a good Pad Thai recipe because I miss Thai food and sushi.

Just as the WASP diet is fairly boring, so are the business ideas in a predominantly white European culture. Innovation comes from looking at things from differing perspectives. Non-white immigrant co-workers in the city were an incredible resource base of new ideas and points of view that aren't available where I live now. I miss having those resources.

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

You're quoting a blog which uses an example from a television show about a zombie apocalypse to make political point about diversity???? Are you really that stupid??

As for Republican Presidents having Democrats in cabinet, and vice versa, it happens all of the time, and quite successfully too, going back to George Washington and continuing to President Obama.

List of United States political appointments across party lines - Wikipedia

There really is no cure for stupid.

You're proof of that. There's nothing stupider than communism, yet you are all for it.

The source of the information isn't relevant. You can accept the argument on it's merits or not. You have done nothing to discredit it except resort to logical fallacies.

In George Washington's day it wasn't nearly so dangerous because at least the parties had the same goal: the welfare of the United States. However these days one of the parties is intent on destroying this country and enslaving eveyrone in it.

You're the one with the flawed and irrevelants arguments here. For example, you claim I'm in favour of communism when there's absolutely no evidence that I am nor have I ever made any statements to that effect. If your only argument against what I've posted is an out and out lie, it doesn't say much for your ideas does it?

The only people who fear diversity are those who are so inferior that they are unable to compete with the new ideas and experiences of a more diverse pool of workers. Racism is based on fear and the inferiority of those who know they can't compete on a level playing field. That's why they seek to exclude as many people as possible from the pool of applicants available.

Your racism and fear of diversity is proof positive of your own inferiority.

The statistics show precisely the opposite. Japan is a very successful country and the least "diverse" on the entire planet. Look at all the successful countries in Europe. They didn't get that way with a "diverse" population.

"Diversity" means crime, civil strife, a vast welfare burden, lack of community cohesiveness, the list goes on and on.

Japan is a very good example. What was the last great Japanese invention? Name it! They've existing technologies but original ideas are in short supply.

The Japanese don't invent things. The homogenous nature of their culture doesn't adapt quickly or well. There is a paucity of new ideas and thinking even as their education system is one of the best in the world.

The golden age of American invention and ingenuity took place in the late 1800's and early 1900's when immigration was at it's peak and unrestricted. All of those new and fresh ideas from all over the world coming together for the first time.

Scotland, and England produced a lot of inventions when they were a very homogeneous society, and far less now that they're a multicultural society.

 

[Issa]

And yet statistics show that the more diversity you have, the more successful your economy. The most successful economies are ones where women share power with men. The least successful are those where women are marginalized have no power.

The more points of view you have, the more ideas you have. Different cultures, races and ethnicities bring a diverse set of ideas and traditions to the business world.

I lived in one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world for 30 years. Now I live in a homogenous white Christian rural community. The closest thing to "ethnic" cuisine in this town is an Italian pasta restaurant. I've been learning to cook Indian food because I miss it, and don't get me started on Asian cuisine. I'm currently on the lookout for a good Pad Thai recipe because I miss Thai food and sushi.

Just as the WASP diet is fairly boring, so are the business ideas in a predominantly white European culture. Innovation comes from looking at things from differing perspectives. Non-white immigrant co-workers in the city were an incredible resource base of new ideas and points of view that aren't available where I live now. I miss having those resources.

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

You're quoting a blog which uses an example from a television show about a zombie apocalypse to make political point about diversity???? Are you really that stupid??

As for Republican Presidents having Democrats in cabinet, and vice versa, it happens all of the time, and quite successfully too, going back to George Washington and continuing to President Obama.

List of United States political appointments across party lines - Wikipedia

There really is no cure for stupid.

You're proof of that. There's nothing stupider than communism, yet you are all for it.

The source of the information isn't relevant. You can accept the argument on it's merits or not. You have done nothing to discredit it except resort to logical fallacies.

In George Washington's day it wasn't nearly so dangerous because at least the parties had the same goal: the welfare of the United States. However these days one of the parties is intent on destroying this country and enslaving eveyrone in it.

You're the one with the flawed and irrevelants arguments here. For example, you claim I'm in favour of communism when there's absolutely no evidence that I am nor have I ever made any statements to that effect. If your only argument against what I've posted is an out and out lie, it doesn't say much for your ideas does it?

The only people who fear diversity are those who are so inferior that they are unable to compete with the new ideas and experiences of a more diverse pool of workers. Racism is based on fear and the inferiority of those who know they can't compete on a level playing field. That's why they seek to exclude as many people as possible from the pool of applicants available.

Your racism and fear of diversity is proof positive of your own inferiority.

The statistics show precisely the opposite. Japan is a very successful country and the least "diverse" on the entire planet. Look at all the successful countries in Europe. They didn't get that way with a "diverse" population.

"Diversity" means crime, civil strife, a vast welfare burden, lack of community cohesiveness, the list goes on and on.

Japan is a very good example. What was the last great Japanese invention? Name it! They've existing technologies but original ideas are in short supply.

The Japanese don't invent things. The homogenous nature of their culture doesn't adapt quickly or well. There is a paucity of new ideas and thinking even as their education system is one of the best in the world.

The golden age of American invention and ingenuity took place in the late 1800's and early 1900's when immigration was at it's peak and unrestricted. All of those new and fresh ideas from all over the world coming together for the first time.

Bravo!!!
Same happened to Andalucia under the moors rule....it benefited from all the immigrants that came in with their ideas and hunger to do better.

 

[Asclepias]

Although I generally disagree with the nonsense from the left, SYTFE does have a valid argument. Diversity in most cases is better than a non diversified group. It’s true in most systems.

it may be true genetically, but it's not true culturally. We gain nothing by mixing our culture with Mexican or Arab culture. Importing these people only brings crime, dependency, ignorance, civil strife and corruption.

It’s pretty difficult to have genetic diversity without mixing cultures. Have you checked your ancestry?

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the Humans of this World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

1. Whites have far less genetic diversity than Blacks.

2. Blacks have a higher genetic diversity that all whites.

3. Whites are becoming more and more mixed thus necessitating the need to call other races white in a vain hope that no one notices.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

What a stupid comment.
Bushman, and Pygmies have the highest genetic diversity in the World, not because of race mixing, but from branching off closer the Pan ancestor of all Great Apes, and thus having experienced less genetic drift.

Furthermore, no race mixing wouldn't increase genetic diversity, but would fall somewhere between the mean of the 2 groups.

Actually when it comes to expression of traits, we'd be more diverse to stay separated.
Because genes wouldn't mix into swaths, but stay separate, and diverse.

Whites are not long for this planet if they stay separate.

Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

"But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number.

The doubly diluted genetic diversity has allowed "bad" mutations to build up in the European population, something that the more genetically varied African population has had more success in weeding out."

Oh my goodness, you're too stupid for words.

1.) Humans have far less genetic diversity than do Chimps, and most Animals.

2.) Whites have a higher genetic diversity than most of the World, only Africans, and Middle-Easterners have a higher genetic diversity.

3.) Whites have survived many thousands of years, why would that change now because some f*cked up dumb Negro thinks so?

Can you call a black man Negro to his face? I wanna see you do that.

One young Black punk in the Jefferson Valley mall, mocked me for how I dressed which was like a Metal-head, so I called him a Negro, and pushed him.
Nothing happened, but he cowered in fear.

However, another Black punk in O'Conners pub in Brewster New York, said "I'll knock you out fat N*gger" so I called him a N"gger back, so I had 8 of them attack me.

Sissiest punches I've ever experienced.

However, there were so many of them I was forced to flee.

That's what i thought....you got your ass kicked twice, and the only time you go away with it...the kid was young. Typical coward in my book.

Oh okay 8 vs 1 (Me) after calling them the N word, and I'm the coward?

Too funny for words.