Did Israel Evict The Palestinians?

[Shusha]

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

LOL! Show us that law.

It's in the UN Charter. Look it up.

TRANSLATION YOU HAVE NO LAW

UN Charter Article 2 (4).

 

[P F Tinmore]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

 

[Shusha]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

 

[Hollie]

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

What war?

 

[USAF 2023]

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

Another lie. Egypt initiated it by blocking Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The U.N. “ peacekeepers “ actually helped them initiate that War by leaving
Please tell me what part of my statement isn’t true

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

Another lie. Egypt initiated it by blocking Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The U.N. “ peacekeepers “ actually helped them initiate that War by leaving
Please tell me what part of my statement isn’t true

Because our friend PF Tinmore gets his history lessons from PressTV produced YouTube videos, his history is a bit skewed.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

What war?

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

Another lie. Egypt initiated it by blocking Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The U.N. “ peacekeepers “ actually helped them initiate that War by leaving
Please tell me what part of my statement isn’t true

Because our friend PF Tinmore gets his history lessons from PressTV produced YouTube videos, his history is a bit skewed.

 

[USAF 2023]

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

israel didn’t squire territory by initiating War.

Israel has always denied starting that war. Not true.

Another lie. Egypt initiated it by blocking Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The U.N. “ peacekeepers “ actually helped them initiate that War by leaving
Please tell me what part of my statement isn’t true

Because our friend PF Tinmore gets his history lessons from PressTV produced YouTube videos, his history is a bit skewed.

One doesn’t have to be a Historian to learn that Egypt DELIBERATELY blocked Israel’s right to INTERNATIONAL WATERS and the U.N. actually helped them in doing so and initiating the War
There will be no response; there never is

 

[P F Tinmore]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

 

[Hollie]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

Your stereotypical one-liner. You addressed nothing.

Who ducked, really?

 

[Shusha]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

 

[P F Tinmore]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

 

[Hollie]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Of course they were. The Treaty of Lausanne, as we know, invented the "country of Pally'land" along with borders and thousands of years of Pal'istanian history.

 

[Shusha]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Well, in point of fact, some of them are. But, so what? Why are we looking for border treaties?

Why are you arguing with me on a point we agree on? Typically, when a territory changes sovereignty, the previous territorial borders continue to hold true. Right? You literally, just argued this in a post on the other thread!

 

[member]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

"Your usual duck.."



oh.....you mean like this kind of a duck:


i was thinking:




- if it walks like a duck






- talks like a duck





- acts like a duck:




...........it's a duck!

QUACK!
​

 

[Shusha]

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Of course they were. The Treaty of Lausanne, as we know, invented the "country of Pally'land" along with borders and thousands of years of Pal'istanian history.

For some bizarre reason, Israel is not allowed to have borders.

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Of course they were. The Treaty of Lausanne, as we know, invented the "country of Pally'land" along with borders and thousands of years of Pal'istanian history.

For some bizarre reason, which I can not fathom, the mythical land of Palestine has borders but Israel does not.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Links? Let's see those treaties.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Well, in point of fact, some of them are. But, so what? Why are we looking for border treaties?

Why are you arguing with me on a point we agree on? Typically, when a territory changes sovereignty, the previous territorial borders continue to hold true. Right? You literally, just argued this in a post on the other thread!

But where is the treaty changing sovereignty?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Of course they were. The Treaty of Lausanne, as we know, invented the "country of Pally'land" along with borders and thousands of years of Pal'istanian history.

For some bizarre reason, Israel is not allowed to have borders.

Don’t be disingenuous. You know exactly which treaties I’m talking about. The fact that you continue to ignore them doesn’t make them cease to exist.

Your usual duck.

I’ve posted them dozens of times. Each time you fail to address them and disappear only to start up this foolishness the next time they are brought up.

I predict you will do so again.

San Remo
Treaty of Lausanne
The Mandate for Palestine
Israel’s Declaration of Independence
UNGA 273

None of those are land/border treaties.

Of course they were. The Treaty of Lausanne, as we know, invented the "country of Pally'land" along with borders and thousands of years of Pal'istanian history.

For some bizarre reason, which I can not fathom, the mythical land of Palestine has borders but Israel does not.

What is so bizarre about the truth?