Did Israel Evict The Palestinians?

[P F Tinmore]

Why do you keep banging away at an issue that is not in refute?

It is in refute. That’s why I refuted it.

You have cut and pasted that snippet a minimum of 212 times and never once did you identify how the Treaty of Lausanne created your imagined, Country of Pal’istan”, the place “Where Dreams Come True”

I never said it did.

You just have a reading comprehension problem.

Actually, you have a problem with honesty and integrity.

What territory was transferred to “Pal’istan “.

Why do you post here when you know so little?
------------
In international law, when a state is dissolved and new states are established, “the population follows the change of sovereignty in matters of nationality.”5 As a rule, therefore, citizens of the former state should automatically acquire the nationality of the successor state in which they had already been residing.

Upon its detachment from the Ottomans, the territory of Palestine became distinct from its neighboring countries.6In fact, this separation began between Palestine and the newly created Arab ‘states’: Trans-Jordan (as it was called), Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon.7 Soon thereafter, Palestine’s frontiers acquired permanent recognition through bilateral agreements with its neighbors. Following the international legal framework that had been established by the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne ending the Ottoman nominal/official sovereignty over the Arab Middle East, each of the four countries instituted a separate nationality for its population through domestic legislation. Nationalities in these countries have since then become well established.

Nationality constitutes a legal bond that connects individuals with a specific territory, making them citizens of that territory. It is therefore imperative to examine the boundaries of Palestine in order to define the piece of land on which Palestinian nationality was established. Determining borders will also help us identify the new nationalities of the inhabitants in the neighboring countries who were Ottoman citizens as well. Such a determination will thus identify, by exclusion, those who held Palestinian nationality.

Genesis of Citizenship in Palestine and Israel

Indeed, why do you post here when you know so little?

Indeed, an opinion piece is not the Treaty of Lausanne.

What territory was transferred to a “country of “Pal’istan”?

Oh jeese!!!

 

[USAF 2023]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

 

[P F Tinmore]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The the answer is no, Israel did not evict any “Palestinians”.

Then did all of those refugees just fall out of the sky?

 

[Hollie]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The the answer is no, Israel did not evict any “Palestinians”.

Then did all of those refugees just fall out of the sky?

What refugees?

 

[Hollie]

It is in refute. That’s why I refuted it.

You have cut and pasted that snippet a minimum of 212 times and never once did you identify how the Treaty of Lausanne created your imagined, Country of Pal’istan”, the place “Where Dreams Come True”

I never said it did.

You just have a reading comprehension problem.

Actually, you have a problem with honesty and integrity.

What territory was transferred to “Pal’istan “.

Why do you post here when you know so little?
------------
In international law, when a state is dissolved and new states are established, “the population follows the change of sovereignty in matters of nationality.”5 As a rule, therefore, citizens of the former state should automatically acquire the nationality of the successor state in which they had already been residing.

Upon its detachment from the Ottomans, the territory of Palestine became distinct from its neighboring countries.6In fact, this separation began between Palestine and the newly created Arab ‘states’: Trans-Jordan (as it was called), Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon.7 Soon thereafter, Palestine’s frontiers acquired permanent recognition through bilateral agreements with its neighbors. Following the international legal framework that had been established by the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne ending the Ottoman nominal/official sovereignty over the Arab Middle East, each of the four countries instituted a separate nationality for its population through domestic legislation. Nationalities in these countries have since then become well established.

Nationality constitutes a legal bond that connects individuals with a specific territory, making them citizens of that territory. It is therefore imperative to examine the boundaries of Palestine in order to define the piece of land on which Palestinian nationality was established. Determining borders will also help us identify the new nationalities of the inhabitants in the neighboring countries who were Ottoman citizens as well. Such a determination will thus identify, by exclusion, those who held Palestinian nationality.

Genesis of Citizenship in Palestine and Israel

Indeed, why do you post here when you know so little?

Indeed, an opinion piece is not the Treaty of Lausanne.

What territory was transferred to a “country of “Pal’istan”?

Oh jeese!!!

Why do you post here when you know so little?

 

[P F Tinmore]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

 

[Joe Bruno]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

 

[Ropey]

 

[Mindful]

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

Why did Jordan do it?

And Turkey? Still there, in Cyprus. Illegally.

 

[Hollie]

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

It was also foolish for the combined Arab armies to believe they could acquire territory by force when they crossed the frontier in 1948 and chose to initiate their war of conquest.

 

[Hollie]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

Israel had another plan.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals.

The Arab claims were the same.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state."

WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

Israel had another plan.

Indeed they did.

http://www.whale.to/b/Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.pdf

 

[Hollie]

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

Israel had another plan.

Indeed they did.

http://www.whale.to/b/Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.pdf

Indeed, a silly cut and paste YouTube video you have spammed multiple threads with.

 

[Joe Bruno]

The Arab claims were the same.


WRONG. UN Resolution 181 partitioned the land into Arab and Jewish sectors and the Jews only took the part given them.

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

LOL! Show us that law.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Not true. Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation that was rejected and abandoned by the UN. The resolution was not implemented by the Security Council as required.

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

LOL! Show us that law.

It's in the UN Charter. Look it up.

 

[Shusha]

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

While more-or-less true, this is a gross oversimplification of the legal principles involved and mostly used as a propaganda statement against Israel, while somehow not quite applying to Arab Palestine, which, of course, according to you, is permitted to use force.

 

[Shusha]

And Israel did not acquire any territory through force, though she did successfully defend herself from illegal forceful invasions by Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. All territory currently under Israel's sovereignty was acquired through peaceful and legal means (treaties).

 

[member]

Obviously, there was a major migration of jews to that part of the world as part of the Zionist movement. So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals. Their purchase of land in "Palestine" was somewhat compromised by the lack of formal deeds and related documentation LOCALLY. Many people (Arabs) who had lived on, and farmed land for "generations" found that "their" land had been sold out from under them, giving them no opportunity to contest the transactions.

There never was a country called "Palestine," nor an ethnicity/nationality called the "Palestinians." That nomenclature - with Roman origins - arose when it became apparent that the jews wanted to claim the area for a newly-formed country of Israel. The indigenous non-jews simply needed a name by which to refer to themselves.

The real problem arose because the jews insisted that the new country be overtly established as a "jewish state." It is ironic that the Arabs had (and continue to have) such a problem with this concept because there are scores of countries in the Middle East and around the world that are overtly "Islamic" states. And ONE jewish state is a problem? And of course, there is nothing prohibiting Arab/Muslims from being a citizens of Israel, or practicing their religion.

There is some disagreement about whether the jews evicted the local Arabs when the State of Israel was declared, or they left voluntarily on the advice of the surrounding Arab states. Regardless, it has been more than 70 years since the fact, and continuing to refer to those who left as "refugees" is preposterous. They need to get a life.

Interestingly, the U.S. has never had a problem with the concept of people coming in from the outside and establishing a new "country" in spite of protests from the locals, because that's pretty much how the U.S. was created.

There never was a country called "Palestine," nor an ethnicity/nationality called the "Palestinians." That nomenclature - with Roman origins - arose when it became apparent that the jews wanted to claim the area for a newly-formed country of Israel. The indigenous non-jews simply needed a name by which to refer to themselves.

Israeli horseshit, of course.
-------------------
Drawing up the framework of nationality, Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne stated:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which in accordance with the provisions of the present Treaty is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto, in the conditions laid down by the local law, nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred.”​

-------------------
The automatic, ipso facto, change from Ottoman to Palestinian nationality was dealt with in Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Citizenship Order, which declared:

“Turkish subjects habitually resident in the territory of Palestine upon the 1st day of August, 1925, shall become Palestinian citizens.”​

Genesis of Citizenship in Palestine and Israel

The above is a fraud you have attempted to commit on many occasions.

Nothing in the Treaty of Lausanne created your imagined “country of Pal’istan”, the place “Where Dreams Come True”

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Citizenship Order

Turkish subjects

Roman origins

conditions laid down by the local law

Treaty of Lausanne




". . .So the ones in question are not the same ones who had lived there for a hundred generations, but rather the more recent arrivals. . ."




oh so what....


..one country 'over there' [that was already spoken for eons ago] ..."israel" - a jewish country. arabs/muslims have so many countries to themselves. no one ELSE allowed to.....be a part of it unless it's a ....tourist !


"ipso facto.........."


....good - less 'islamic terrorist' settlements over there in Israel.........

 

[Joe Bruno]

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism, or Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6] Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, a civil war broke out[10] and the plan was not implemented.[11]

It was not implemented because it was rejected by the Arabs

The Palestinians had the right to reject the plan and they did. Without their agreement, the plan was dead.

They thought the Arab armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan would invade and push the Jews out. Too bad the Jews kicked their ass in the war and they lost everything.

It is illegal to acquire territory by force.

LOL! Show us that law.

It's in the UN Charter. Look it up.

TRANSLATION YOU HAVE NO LAW