Diane Feinstein wants to take ALL of your guns

[JoeB131]

[QU

Are you seriously pretending that there are no killings in Europe?

Go back. Read what I wrote. Have someone help you with the big words.

 

[miketx]

Where are the lying liberals that claim otherwise?

THE TYPICAL LIBERAL on TikTok

Is Feinstein running for President?

Yes.

 

[hadit]

[QU

Are you seriously pretending that there are no killings in Europe?

Go back. Read what I wrote. Have someone help you with the big words.

Apparently, "These things don't happen in Europe" means something different in your world.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

Nothing short of a complete police state would have prevented him from killing.

again- These things don't happen in Europe. Why do you think that is? Are they all "Police States" there.

Hey, do you know how many people are shot by Police in the US every year? About 900.
Do you know how many people are shot by police in the UK? Less than 10.

Do you know how many people we have in prison in the US? Over 2 million.
Do you know how many people they have in prison in the UK? 83,000.

Tell me, which one is the police state? The country that limits gun ownership and has little crime or incarceration or police violence, or the one where any nut can own a gun, and the cops have to act like an occupying army?

Are you seriously pretending that there are no killings in Europe?

It used to be the liberals wanted to argue Japan until they were called on both how the Japanese report their statistics and that the suicide rate is much higher in Japan than the U.S.

I've never seen anyone like that troll. He has an off topic, straw man argument and more lies than any anti-gunner on earth.

Switzerland and Finland both have an armed citizenry. What anti-gunners do not want is an honest view of the big picture. That is why Slow Joe is filibustering with non sequitirs. I prefer the bottom line when liberals have to admit that the real, underlying issue is not always the availability to firearms:

Violent Crime: The US and Abroad - Criminal Justice Degree Hub

 

[Porter Rockwell]

If someone can tell me what this idiot is babbling about, please summarize. I do not read multi quotes. The straw man arguments and this nutjob's pathetic attempts at supporting gun control should be an embarrassment to all liberals. If they aren't, we've got this won.

Your concession is duly noted. I'm sorry you have such a short attention span. Maybe if you took that Ritalin as a child like you were supposed to, you'd be able to focus on reading.

You are obviously a drug addict. But since you want to be a smart ass and have it handed to you, I can dish it out.

First, let's face a few facts. You are a smart ass that thinks he has all the answers. Soooo. WHO GETS TO MAKE THE DETERMINATION IF SOMEONE IS ANTI-SOCIAL?

Up to 45 police reports, numerous expulsions from school for violence, and people expressing fears after being threatened and harassed... When in the Hell, if ever, do we do a civil intervention and have someone who is qualified interview this individual? Never? You're just going to give them some feel good pills to pop?

You are disreputable. NOBODY would suggest that a single instance of not getting along or being different is just cause to try and determine whether or not a person has a mental / emotional issue that may require society to intervene. However, when people are on mind altering drugs like SSRIs AND racking up one police report after another and getting expelled from school for violence repeatedly, you don't sit on your ass and think more pills in stronger doses are going to rectify the situation.

You should stow it dude. You don't have any good arguments to make. You have a bunch of degenerates like you trying to run this country and the fact is, if we took the whole lot of them and turned their brains into dynamite, there wouldn't be enough charge to blow one's nose. The average American, compared to their counterparts in other countries, is less responsible, has fewer critical thinking skills, is more likely to be a criminal and more likely to be a drug addict.

The current generation of Americans of about 40 years old and under have lived on Easy Street all their lives. Many, such as you, still live in mommy's house, never have had to pay a bill, cannot deal with life, and just want to impose on the Liberty of others because you can't take responsibility for your own lives. You've marginalized the lives of people killed by DUI (you need that booze) and you make excuses to trivialize those people killed by smoking. Booze and smoking have no specific guarantees in the Constitution either. Those substances KILL people; however, we assume the risk as part of the cost of Liberty.

If you get an America where you feel safe doing your drugs then the HELL with the rest of the world. Okay, Slow Joe. I understand your position. If it takes a socialist cesspool to make America a safe haven for drug addicts and criminals, you are all in. Make no mistake, however. When your mortal body is pushing up daisies, there will be Americans with firearms... high capacity magazines, folding stocks, and all.

 

[JoeB131]

It used to be the liberals wanted to argue Japan until they were called on both how the Japanese report their statistics and that the suicide rate is much higher in Japan than the U.S.

I'll still argue Japan has solved the gun violence problem. They are working on the suicide problem.

Switzerland and Finland both have an armed citizenry. What anti-gunners do not want is an honest view of the big picture. That is why Slow Joe is filibustering with non sequitirs. I prefer the bottom line when liberals have to admit that the real, underlying issue is not always the availability to firearms:

Okay, guy, let's look at that. First, Switzerland is not the happy gun land you think it is. They put in several restrictions on gun ownership several years ago after a few nuts shot up village halls.

As for Finland, you should probably read up on Finland's gun laws. They are a lot more restrictive than ours.

Guns in Finland — Firearms, gun law and gun control

You are obviously a drug addict. But since you want to be a smart ass and have it handed to you, I can dish it out.

Sorry, man, don't do drugs. I listened to Mr. T.

Up to 45 police reports, numerous expulsions from school for violence, and people expressing fears after being threatened and harassed... When in the Hell, if ever, do we do a civil intervention and have someone who is qualified interview this individual? Never? You're just going to give them some feel good pills to pop?

He also didn't do anything serious enough to break the law... Or restrict his ability to buy a gun.

You are disreputable. NOBODY would suggest that a single instance of not getting along or being different is just cause to try and determine whether or not a person has a mental / emotional issue that may require society to intervene. However, when people are on mind altering drugs like SSRIs AND racking up one police report after another and getting expelled from school for violence repeatedly, you don't sit on your ass and think more pills in stronger doses are going to rectify the situation.

The problem was that Cruz WASN'T TAKING his medications he had been on when he was a special needs student. The meds were keeping him under control.

You should stow it dude. You don't have any good arguments to make. You have a bunch of degenerates like you trying to run this country and the fact is, if we took the whole lot of them and turned their brains into dynamite, there wouldn't be enough charge to blow one's nose. The average American, compared to their counterparts in other countries, is less responsible, has fewer critical thinking skills, is more likely to be a criminal and more likely to be a drug addict.

Oh, I agree, Americans are much stupider than Europeans or Japanese. Our gun laws prove it.

The current generation of Americans of about 40 years old and under have lived on Easy Street all their lives. Many, such as you, still live in mommy's house, never have had to pay a bill, cannot deal with life, and just want to impose on the Liberty of others because you can't take responsibility for your own lives. You've marginalized the lives of people killed by DUI (you need that booze) and you make excuses to trivialize those people killed by smoking. Booze and smoking have no specific guarantees in the Constitution either. Those substances KILL people; however, we assume the risk as part of the cost of Liberty.

Dude, I'm 58, my parents passed away when I was 20, so you are just getting so much wrong. We are taking actions to reduce smoking and DUI Deaths... we need to do the same with the Gun Culture.

If you get an America where you feel safe doing your drugs then the HELL with the rest of the world. Okay, Slow Joe. I understand your position. If it takes a socialist cesspool to make America a safe haven for drug addicts and criminals, you are all in. Make no mistake, however. When your mortal body is pushing up daisies, there will be Americans with firearms... high capacity magazines, folding stocks, and all.

Actually, within 10 years, we will see serious gun control and a clamp on the crazy gun culture. The NRA is already collapsing of its own corruption.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

It used to be the liberals wanted to argue Japan until they were called on both how the Japanese report their statistics and that the suicide rate is much higher in Japan than the U.S.

I'll still argue Japan has solved the gun violence problem. They are working on the suicide problem.

Switzerland and Finland both have an armed citizenry. What anti-gunners do not want is an honest view of the big picture. That is why Slow Joe is filibustering with non sequitirs. I prefer the bottom line when liberals have to admit that the real, underlying issue is not always the availability to firearms:

Okay, guy, let's look at that. First, Switzerland is not the happy gun land you think it is. They put in several restrictions on gun ownership several years ago after a few nuts shot up village halls.

As for Finland, you should probably read up on Finland's gun laws. They are a lot more restrictive than ours.

Guns in Finland — Firearms, gun law and gun control

You are obviously a drug addict. But since you want to be a smart ass and have it handed to you, I can dish it out.

Sorry, man, don't do drugs. I listened to Mr. T.

Up to 45 police reports, numerous expulsions from school for violence, and people expressing fears after being threatened and harassed... When in the Hell, if ever, do we do a civil intervention and have someone who is qualified interview this individual? Never? You're just going to give them some feel good pills to pop?

He also didn't do anything serious enough to break the law... Or restrict his ability to buy a gun.

You are disreputable. NOBODY would suggest that a single instance of not getting along or being different is just cause to try and determine whether or not a person has a mental / emotional issue that may require society to intervene. However, when people are on mind altering drugs like SSRIs AND racking up one police report after another and getting expelled from school for violence repeatedly, you don't sit on your ass and think more pills in stronger doses are going to rectify the situation.

The problem was that Cruz WASN'T TAKING his medications he had been on when he was a special needs student. The meds were keeping him under control.

You should stow it dude. You don't have any good arguments to make. You have a bunch of degenerates like you trying to run this country and the fact is, if we took the whole lot of them and turned their brains into dynamite, there wouldn't be enough charge to blow one's nose. The average American, compared to their counterparts in other countries, is less responsible, has fewer critical thinking skills, is more likely to be a criminal and more likely to be a drug addict.

Oh, I agree, Americans are much stupider than Europeans or Japanese. Our gun laws prove it.

The current generation of Americans of about 40 years old and under have lived on Easy Street all their lives. Many, such as you, still live in mommy's house, never have had to pay a bill, cannot deal with life, and just want to impose on the Liberty of others because you can't take responsibility for your own lives. You've marginalized the lives of people killed by DUI (you need that booze) and you make excuses to trivialize those people killed by smoking. Booze and smoking have no specific guarantees in the Constitution either. Those substances KILL people; however, we assume the risk as part of the cost of Liberty.

Dude, I'm 58, my parents passed away when I was 20, so you are just getting so much wrong. We are taking actions to reduce smoking and DUI Deaths... we need to do the same with the Gun Culture.

If you get an America where you feel safe doing your drugs then the HELL with the rest of the world. Okay, Slow Joe. I understand your position. If it takes a socialist cesspool to make America a safe haven for drug addicts and criminals, you are all in. Make no mistake, however. When your mortal body is pushing up daisies, there will be Americans with firearms... high capacity magazines, folding stocks, and all.

Actually, within 10 years, we will see serious gun control and a clamp on the crazy gun culture. The NRA is already collapsing of its own corruption.

I don't do multi - quotes. If I were to read the above, it would lead to a response 99 percent of you would not read. Let me give you the real skinny:

A few days ago Joe Biden looks into the camera and blamed everybody but himself for the failure of the Assault Weapons Ban to become permanent. THEN, he threatened the American gun owners and said he was going to take their guns. Let's be honest:

America banned so - called "assault weapons" for TEN YEARS. For Ten years Joe's utopia was set into place. The fact is, even with Biden pushing for the bill to become permanent, despite George Bush promising to sign the bill if it came across his desk, IT FAILED.

The American people spoke and they did so rather resoundingly. Joe n Joe (Biden and our resident troll) obviously could not respect democracy and they kept trying to force their will onto others.

As I've said before, America is NOT a democracy; we are a constitutional Republic. Anti-gunners did not understand that and in the TEN YEARS that the law was being proven ineffective, the Joes did NOTHING - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to further reduce the number of deaths. All they are committed to is control. They don't really give two hoots in Hell about saving lives; it's all about hating inanimate objects that they fear. Well that and their hatred of Liberty.

If anti-gunners want to reduce the number of deaths by firearms without gun control, I'm your man. Between that and the end of this life I will not be giving up any gun, registering any gun, or allowing Biden to take a damn thing from me. If the left wants to threaten the right, I hope that the right has the balls to step forward and take Patrick Henry's admonitions seriously:

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing
will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined."

I'm not giving up anything and hope that the rest of the gun owners are sick of being threatened.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I listened to Mr. T.

As well you should. He's probably the only person on Earth who has compassion for you.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

America banned so - called "assault weapons" for TEN YEARS. For Ten years Joe's utopia was set into place. The fact is, even with Biden pushing for the bill to become permanent, despite George Bush promising to sign the bill if it came across his desk, IT FAILED.

The American people spoke and they did so rather resoundingly.

One thing that was interesting was a few years later, when, for the first time in forty years, Republicans took majorities in both houses of Congress, Bill Clinton admitted that the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban was likely a major factor in the voters turning against the Democrats at that point and voting in these Republican majorities. Even then, with the voting public being as vulnerable as they ever would be to the disinformation that supported this ban, there was enough opposition for it to have a major effect on the next election. And the public, as a whole, is much better informed, now, than it was then. Trying to resurrect this ban again is political suicide.

 

[JoeB131]

A few days ago Joe Biden looks into the camera and blamed everybody but himself for the failure of the Assault Weapons Ban to become permanent. THEN, he threatened the American gun owners and said he was going to take their guns. Let's be honest:

America banned so - called "assault weapons" for TEN YEARS. For Ten years Joe's utopia was set into place. The fact is, even with Biden pushing for the bill to become permanent, despite George Bush promising to sign the bill if it came across his desk, IT FAILED.

Actually, the Assault Weapons ban worked just fine.

Please note that the number of people killed in mass shootings was cut in half after the Assault Weapons ban took effect. When it was eliminated, the number more than tripled.

If anti-gunners want to reduce the number of deaths by firearms without gun control, I'm your man. Between that and the end of this life I will not be giving up any gun, registering any gun, or allowing Biden to take a damn thing from me. If the left wants to threaten the right, I hope that the right has the balls to step forward and take Patrick Henry's admonitions seriously:

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing
will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined."
I'm not giving up anything and hope that the rest of the gun owners are sick of being threatened.

I can always tell when they are losing when they use bigger fonts.

Look,man, you work on the assumption that I really care if the ATF does a Waco on your ass. I really don't. I'll happily get the popcorn.

 

[JoeB131]

One thing that was interesting was a few years later, when, for the first time in forty years, Republicans took majorities in both houses of Congress, Bill Clinton admitted that the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban was likely a major factor in the voters turning against the Democrats at that point and voting in these Republican majorities. Even then, with the voting public being as vulnerable as they ever would be to the disinformation that supported this ban, there was enough opposition for it to have a major effect on the next election. And the public, as a whole, is much better informed, now, than it was then. Trying to resurrect this ban again is political suicide.

Mormon Bob, after hundreds of mass shootings, I suspect most people would support the Assault Weapon Ban coming back.

Yes, the Assault Weapons ban was a scapegoat in the 1994 debacle (which had a lot more to do with the fact it too long for Bush Sr.'s recession to end.) But by the logic you just posited, then Bob Dole should have EASILY won in 1996 two years later. In fact, he didn't. In fact, your party hasn't won the popular vote in any national election since except for 2004, when we were all seeing terrorists under our beds.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

A few days ago Joe Biden looks into the camera and blamed everybody but himself for the failure of the Assault Weapons Ban to become permanent. THEN, he threatened the American gun owners and said he was going to take their guns. Let's be honest:

America banned so - called "assault weapons" for TEN YEARS. For Ten years Joe's utopia was set into place. The fact is, even with Biden pushing for the bill to become permanent, despite George Bush promising to sign the bill if it came across his desk, IT FAILED.

Actually, the Assault Weapons ban worked just fine.

Please note that the number of people killed in mass shootings was cut in half after the Assault Weapons ban took effect. When it was eliminated, the number more than tripled.

If anti-gunners want to reduce the number of deaths by firearms without gun control, I'm your man. Between that and the end of this life I will not be giving up any gun, registering any gun, or allowing Biden to take a damn thing from me. If the left wants to threaten the right, I hope that the right has the balls to step forward and take Patrick Henry's admonitions seriously:

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing
will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined."
I'm not giving up anything and hope that the rest of the gun owners are sick of being threatened.

I can always tell when they are losing when they use bigger fonts.

Look,man, you work on the assumption that I really care if the ATF does a Waco on your ass. I really don't. I'll happily get the popcorn.

You're full of shit... but, you already knew that. My using bigger fonts just lets you know I'd like to yell it at you (though I bold words that need specific attention drawn to them because blind ass people like you tend to ignore the major points of a post.)

Actually, the AWB did not work just fine. It did not garner enough support to pass after a full decade trial run. Dude, you live in denial of reality.

I realize that you don't give a rip about my life - nor do you care for anyone else's life. The children excuse is a cover for the kind of totalitarian B.S. government you crave for to provide for your sorry ass and give you the things you want. That is why anti - gunners are hypocrites and liars.

If you gave a shit about kids, you wouldn't take any pleasure in me having troubles because you disagree with me on a political issue. Children may depend upon me for food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc. But, you really don't give a fuck. You, and those like you, only try to appeal to the emotions of dumb asses that think you care. But, if you get what you want, you don't care what happens to your fellow man who takes an interest in his Liberties.

No, I have your number. It's zero because anti-gunners are losers. They want a socialist government to take from those who produce so you can lay around on your lazy ass, leeching off the rest of America. Those who depend upon me will be glad to know that while you're preaching about their safety, you would derive pleasure out of watching the guy whose feeding the family die for your amusement. Libs are a freaking trip.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yes, the Assault Weapons ban was a scapegoat in the 1994 debacle (which had a lot more to do with the fact it too long for Bush Sr.'s recession to end.) But by the logic you just posited, then Bob Dole should have EASILY won in 1996 two years later. In fact, he didn't. In fact, your party hasn't won the popular vote in any national election since except for 2004, when we were all seeing terrorists under our beds.

It was Bill Clinton who came out and said it; admittedly not the most honest reporter, and perhaps not the most reliable anyway. There was, however, a study done. I don't know if, more than two decades later, I can find it, but what it found was that no other single issue correlated so strongly with Congresscrooks and Senators being voted out of office in 1996, 1998, and 1990, than having voted for the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban. That would seem to back up Bill Clinton's statement, that the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban did play a significant role in flipping both houses, giving Republicans, for the first time in forty years, majorities in both houses.

In any event, the original fraudulent “assault weapon” ban included a requirement that a study be conducted at the end of its ten-year run, evaluating its role on the incident of crime. That study was conducted, and found that the ban had no discernible effect at all. This is the result that ought to have been expected, given that nearly all of the weapons fraudulently targeted as “assault weapons” were rifles, and rifles of all kinds have never been a significant factor in crimes. Nearly all criminal uses of firearms involve handguns, not rifles or shotguns; and fewer murders are committed using rifles of any kind than are committed using several non-firearm means; so it stands to reason that banning any subset of rifles should not have any significant effect on crime. You'd get a greater effect on the rate of homicides if you could ban such things as knives, hammers, baseball bats, and such, than by banning rifles of any kind. To go after firearms, you'd have to go after handguns; we already had that fight decades ago, and your side lost. Your side won't go after handguns, because you know you'd just lose again, at least as badly as you lost before.

 

[JoeB131]

You're full of shit... but, you already knew that. My using bigger fonts just lets you know I'd like to yell it at you (though I bold words that need specific attention drawn to them because blind ass people like you tend to ignore the major points of a post.)

Actually, the AWB did not work just fine. It did not garner enough support to pass after a full decade trial run. Dude, you live in denial of reality.

The number of mass shootings and number of casualties in mass shootings went down.

I realize that you don't give a rip about my life - nor do you care for anyone else's life. The children excuse is a cover for the kind of totalitarian B.S. government you crave for to provide for your sorry ass and give you the things you want. That is why anti - gunners are hypocrites and liars.

If you gave a shit about kids, you wouldn't take any pleasure in me having troubles because you disagree with me on a political issue. Children may depend upon me for food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc. But, you really don't give a fuck. You, and those like you, only try to appeal to the emotions of dumb asses that think you care. But, if you get what you want, you don't care what happens to your fellow man who takes an interest in his Liberties.

I can't get worked up because you have troubles of you own making. Frankly, you are exactly the kind of gun nut we should disarm. the one who is absolutely crazy enough to think he needs guns to fight the government. He's the one likely to shoot some poor census worker or cop just doing his job.

No, I have your number. It's zero because anti-gunners are losers. They want a socialist government to take from those who produce so you can lay around on your lazy ass, leeching off the rest of America. Those who depend upon me will be glad to know that while you're preaching about their safety, you would derive pleasure out of watching the guy whose feeding the family die for your amusement. Libs are a freaking trip.

The only people I see lounging around on the hard labor of others are the wealthy. Here, let me help you out.

This woman works very hard for the Hilton cleaning up dirty semen stained sheets, cleaning puke off of bathroom floors, and she has do to a lot of them quickly.

This person lives a high life off the hard work that the woman in the first picture labors over.

 

[JoeB131]

It was Bill Clinton who came out and said it; admittedly not the most honest reporter, and perhaps not the most reliable anyway. There was, however, a study done. I don't know if, more than two decades later, I can find it, but what it found was that no other single issue correlated so strongly with Congresscrooks and Senators being voted out of office in 1996, 1998, and 1990, than having voted for the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban. That would seem to back up Bill Clinton's statement, that the fraudulent “assault weapon” ban did play a significant role in flipping both houses, giving Republicans, for the first time in forty years, majorities in both houses.

Actually, Bill was full of bullshit excuses about why he was a mediocre president. I suppose you also believed him when he said that the Lewinsky thing was a "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"? Didn't think so.

He lost Congress because 1) The recession didn't end fast enough, 2) A lot of districts were redrawn after the 1990 census to favor republicans 3) He had an unfavorable senate map.and 4) The incumbent party ALWAYS loses seats in midterms.

In 1996, the Democrats gained Congress seats back. They gained seats back in 1998 and 2000 as well. (even though 1998 was a mid-term) So, not the Assault Weapons ban was simply not that much of a factor in elections.

In any event, the original fraudulent “assault weapon” ban included a requirement that a study be conducted at the end of its ten-year run, evaluating its role on the incident of crime. That study was conducted, and found that the ban had no discernible effect at all. This is the result that ought to have been expected, given that nearly all of the weapons fraudulently targeted as “assault weapons” were rifles, and rifles of all kinds have never been a significant factor in crimes. Nearly all criminal uses of firearms involve handguns, not rifles or shotguns; and fewer murders are committed using rifles of any kind than are committed using several non-firearm means; so it stands to reason that banning any subset of rifles should not have any significant effect on crime. You'd get a greater effect on the rate of homicides if you could ban such things as knives, hammers, baseball bats, and such, than by banning rifles of any kind. To go after firearms, you'd have to go after handguns; we already had that fight decades ago, and your side lost. Your side won't go after handguns, because you know you'd just lose again, at least as badly as you lost before.

Who did this "Study"?

The problem with Assault Rifles is not how often they are used in crime (answer- too often) but how much damage they can do. As stated in the chart above, the number of mass shootings DID decline during the 10 years the ban. But since George W. Stupid was owned by the NRA, Osama Bin Laden could have walked into a Middle School in 2003, and he still would have let the Assault Weapons ban expire.

So we all have to take off our shoes at the airport, because one guy failed to blow up his sneakers... but that nut job in San Fernando and his wife were able to garner a bunch of assault weapons and mow down his coworkers for Allah.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

You're full of shit... but, you already knew that. My using bigger fonts just lets you know I'd like to yell it at you (though I bold words that need specific attention drawn to them because blind ass people like you tend to ignore the major points of a post.)

Actually, the AWB did not work just fine. It did not garner enough support to pass after a full decade trial run. Dude, you live in denial of reality.

The number of mass shootings and number of casualties in mass shootings went down.

I realize that you don't give a rip about my life - nor do you care for anyone else's life. The children excuse is a cover for the kind of totalitarian B.S. government you crave for to provide for your sorry ass and give you the things you want. That is why anti - gunners are hypocrites and liars.

If you gave a shit about kids, you wouldn't take any pleasure in me having troubles because you disagree with me on a political issue. Children may depend upon me for food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc. But, you really don't give a fuck. You, and those like you, only try to appeal to the emotions of dumb asses that think you care. But, if you get what you want, you don't care what happens to your fellow man who takes an interest in his Liberties.

I can't get worked up because you have troubles of you own making. Frankly, you are exactly the kind of gun nut we should disarm. the one who is absolutely crazy enough to think he needs guns to fight the government. He's the one likely to shoot some poor census worker or cop just doing his job.

No, I have your number. It's zero because anti-gunners are losers. They want a socialist government to take from those who produce so you can lay around on your lazy ass, leeching off the rest of America. Those who depend upon me will be glad to know that while you're preaching about their safety, you would derive pleasure out of watching the guy whose feeding the family die for your amusement. Libs are a freaking trip.

The only people I see lounging around on the hard labor of others are the wealthy. Here, let me help you out.

View attachment 309597
This woman works very hard for the Hilton cleaning up dirty semen stained sheets, cleaning puke off of bathroom floors, and she has do to a lot of them quickly.

View attachment 309598
This person lives a high life off the hard work that the woman in the first picture labors over.

Reported

 

[hadit]

You're full of shit... but, you already knew that. My using bigger fonts just lets you know I'd like to yell it at you (though I bold words that need specific attention drawn to them because blind ass people like you tend to ignore the major points of a post.)

Actually, the AWB did not work just fine. It did not garner enough support to pass after a full decade trial run. Dude, you live in denial of reality.

The number of mass shootings and number of casualties in mass shootings went down.

I realize that you don't give a rip about my life - nor do you care for anyone else's life. The children excuse is a cover for the kind of totalitarian B.S. government you crave for to provide for your sorry ass and give you the things you want. That is why anti - gunners are hypocrites and liars.

If you gave a shit about kids, you wouldn't take any pleasure in me having troubles because you disagree with me on a political issue. Children may depend upon me for food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc. But, you really don't give a fuck. You, and those like you, only try to appeal to the emotions of dumb asses that think you care. But, if you get what you want, you don't care what happens to your fellow man who takes an interest in his Liberties.

I can't get worked up because you have troubles of you own making. Frankly, you are exactly the kind of gun nut we should disarm. the one who is absolutely crazy enough to think he needs guns to fight the government. He's the one likely to shoot some poor census worker or cop just doing his job.

No, I have your number. It's zero because anti-gunners are losers. They want a socialist government to take from those who produce so you can lay around on your lazy ass, leeching off the rest of America. Those who depend upon me will be glad to know that while you're preaching about their safety, you would derive pleasure out of watching the guy whose feeding the family die for your amusement. Libs are a freaking trip.

The only people I see lounging around on the hard labor of others are the wealthy. Here, let me help you out.

View attachment 309597
This woman works very hard for the Hilton cleaning up dirty semen stained sheets, cleaning puke off of bathroom floors, and she has do to a lot of them quickly.

View attachment 309598
This person lives a high life off the hard work that the woman in the first picture labors over.

The first person contributes maybe $30,000/year to the economy. The second contributes that much in a single evening out on the town.

 

[Porter Rockwell]

This thread is a trip with liberals trying to discredit anyone that puts the facts on the table. The filibustering, fluff, lies, straw man arguments, ad hominems, personal attacks, insinuations, accusations, and deflections show that the anti-gun left has nothing.

Personally, I've owned and shot firearms since I was 11. I remember at that age, boarding a school bus with my .22 LR rifle and the bus driver only asking if I had unloaded it and had the bullets in the box. Like most other guys, it was stored in my locker and after school, we would all go into the woods and shoot.

Today, I can obtain security clearances that none of these left wing potheads could even begin to dream about and they are trying to make themselves believe I pose a danger and should be disarmed after more than a half century of living this life. What it really says is that there are a lot of shortcomings in THEIR lives.

America's violence problems have little to do with the access to weapons. Study after study has shown this. We are a complex nation of 350 + million people that are divided in terms of race, religion, experiences, economics, and any ideological beliefs one can imagine. We are the drug capital of the world and the prison capital of the world. At the end of the day, the anti-gunners cannot prevail.

People are learning how to build their own weapons from scratch and you cannot turn back the clock on technology. So, the threats from the left are only fit to piss people off in these kinds of discussions because just like the bump stock ban, not even 1 percent of the American people are going to comply. And, while the left is pursuing gun owners, the rates of violence will continue to rise, unabated by any pretentious and unconstitutional attempts to disarm the citizenry.

If war comes in my lifetime, I do hope that it happens when I'm physically able to defend myself and my country.

 

[luchitociencia]

Where are the lying liberals that claim otherwise?

THE TYPICAL LIBERAL on TikTok

Don't trust that Jewish woman.

 

[JoeB131]

The first person contributes maybe $30,000/year to the economy. The second contributes that much in a single evening out on the town.

The second person is a parasite living off the hard work of others. Happy to have cleared that up for you, you looked a little dopey.