DHS Document Undermines Trump Case For Muslim Travel Ban

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

Nah, just keep out the Muzzies.

 

[Marion Morrison]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Screw that, they all need high velocity head lead implants, IMO.

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

 

[Reasonable]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

I saw the show tonite. I like when Rachel said she was no sleuth that SOMEONE WANTED HER TO HAVE THIS INFO.
Our government is trying to protect us from Donald J Trump.
Never seen anything like this in my life.

Translation: The establishment is crapping bricks over Donald Trump, a real American that is now in the White House.


Yah Fuck them,they wanted Jeb! Well guess what? No more Bushes and no more Clintons.DJT might as well be Daniel Boone. We know you establishment bastards don't like it and we don't care. Keep making waves and be prepared to pay the price, that is all.

Translation: you think you know more than the people who study this information for a living.
Why hasn't Trump re- rolled out his new travel ban? It was supposed to be yesterday... then today... now not this week at all.
But you bought comrade's lie "we're in grave and present danger."

No critical thinking skills whatsoever. That's what blind patriotism does to your mind.

 

[Reasonable]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

 

[frigidweirdo]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

Nah, just keep out the Muzzies.

Ah, it's always good to do something to others, don't need to solve the problem, just need to feel good about pretending it's always someone else, right?

 

[Marion Morrison]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

I saw the show tonite. I like when Rachel said she was no sleuth that SOMEONE WANTED HER TO HAVE THIS INFO.
Our government is trying to protect us from Donald J Trump.
Never seen anything like this in my life.

Now it's "bad" to be a patriot, amirite?

It's better to be a leftist doosh, according to you, correct? I love America and freedom baby. That does not make me a bad man.





Translation: The establishment is crapping bricks over Donald Trump, a real American that is now in the White House.


Yah Fuck them,they wanted Jeb! Well guess what? No more Bushes and no more Clintons.DJT might as well be Daniel Boone. We know you establishment bastards don't like it and we don't care. Keep making waves and be prepared to pay the price, that is all.

Translation: you think you know more than the people who study this information for a living.
Why hasn't Trump re- rolled out his new travel ban? It was supposed to be yesterday... then today... now not this week at all.
But you bought comrade's lie "we're in grave and present danger."

No critical thinking skills whatsoever. That's what blind patriotism does to your mind.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Now it's "bad" to be a patriot, amirite?

It's better to be a leftist doosh, according to you, correct? I love America and freedom baby. That does not make me a bad man.

It does make seditious enemies enemies.

Do not play. My patience is worn thin.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

Nah, just keep out the Muzzies.

Ah, it's always good to do something to others, don't need to solve the problem, just need to feel good about pretending it's always someone else, right?

Ah, it's always good to do something to others

Do something to others? Nah, just keep them out of the US.

 

[Reasonable]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.
Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

You've been duped again trump humps.

 

[Reasonable]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

It doesn't say anything about Islamaphobia or hating immigrants.

However the Declaration of Independence guarantees the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

ICE, Homeland Security and a host of other agencies have concluded Trump's Muslim ban is NOT EFFECTIVE.

Each and every day the pussy grabber gets kicked in the balls.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

Nah, just keep out the Muzzies.

Ah, it's always good to do something to others, don't need to solve the problem, just need to feel good about pretending it's always someone else, right?

Ah, it's always good to do something to others

Do something to others? Nah, just keep them out of the US.

Which is doing something....

 

[frigidweirdo]

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.
Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

You've been duped again trump humps.

Not only that, the ban is more likely to radicalize Muslims living in the US right now.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The Rachel Maddow Show has obtained, exclusively, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document. The document, from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.

The document follows another piece of research (pdf) from Homeland Security that undercut President Trump’s rationale for a travel ban as a means of keeping violent extremists out. On Friday, the Associated Press published an analysis from Homeland Security that said citizenship in any given country – including the seven countries listed in the executive order – is likely an unreliable indicator of whether someone poses a terrorist threat.

The new assessment, obtained by the Rachel Maddow Show and dated March 1, tracks 88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.

Homeland Security tonight has confirmed the authenticity of the document. The department says production of it began in August 2016, and that it likely would have reached the White House. We have asked the White House for comment tonight. They have not responded.

Read the document below:

More: TRMS Exclusive: DHS document undermines Trump case for travel ban

Sounds like Trump's Muslim travel ban is dead.

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

No, it doesn't. Also doesn't say the US needs to invade Iraq. But hey, it happened.

Since 2001 the right has made it a policy, which mirrors the right's policy in Israel, to make, nurture, foment and increase fear.

It's hardly surprising, the right didn't know what to do after the end of the Cold War, defense spending was down, which mean campaign funding was down. It means the right would have to work harder for their votes, it mean they'd struggle to get in their key policies, it would mean a disaster for the right.

So, they made Islam the enemy, dressing it up as just Islamic fundamentalism of a certain type to keep states like Saudi Arabia on board and keep the oil flowing. They managed to hit OPEC which was trying to get stronger under Hugo Chavez too.

This whole policy has taken 16 years, the world is far less safe, the US is far more draconian now than it's been in a long time, the right is happy, more or less, they're back in the game.

You, on the other hand, are getting screwed up the ass, but you like it because they tell you that they're winning, and that's all you care about.

 

[Reasonable]

Trump's Muslim ban has been the best ISIS recruiting tool ever.
It's all over their literature.
Now we find out this nutball ban has absolutely nothing to do with keeping us safe.

Everything this novice touches turns to shit.
It's not like we didn't warn you sheep.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.
Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

You've been duped again trump humps.

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.

Sounds like a good reason to keep them out.

Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

If they aren't here, they can't get radicalized here.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So the entire argument is they don't become radicalized until they get here so there's no danger letting them in?

Libtarded doesn't do you idiots justice.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

It doesn't say anything about Islamaphobia or hating immigrants.

However the Declaration of Independence guarantees the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

ICE, Homeland Security and a host of other agencies have concluded Trump's Muslim ban is NOT EFFECTIVE.

Each and every day the pussy grabber gets kicked in the balls.

However the Declaration of Independence guarantees the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

All good reasons to keep Muslims out.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

But then again the biggest safety issues are with Americans, keep them out too?

Nah, just keep out the Muzzies.

Ah, it's always good to do something to others, don't need to solve the problem, just need to feel good about pretending it's always someone else, right?

Ah, it's always good to do something to others

Do something to others? Nah, just keep them out of the US.

Which is doing something....

Yeah, keeping terrorists out is doing something.
Count on a liberal to be against that....DERP!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.
Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

You've been duped again trump humps.

Not only that, the ban is more likely to radicalize Muslims living in the US right now.

Oooooh, a good reason to get rid of the ones already here.

 

[Reasonable]

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy. But we don't want to change that policy, let's just keep on hitting Muslim countries and pretend there aren't any consequences.

Or maybe they become radicalized because of US policy.

Good point. Keep them all out of the US, until we no longer have a policy.
Then keep them out longer. Just to be safe.

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Ben Franklin

Yeah let's rip up the Constitution .. just for the illusion of safety.

Does the Constitution say we need to let in Muslims?
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't remember that part......

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.
Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

You've been duped again trump humps.

The experts: Most Terrorists get radicalized AFTER they come to the US.

Sounds like a good reason to keep them out.

Making Trump's Muslim ban a giant crock of shit.

If they aren't here, they can't get radicalized here.

There's no extreme vetting. How can there be if they get radicalized after they arrive.
And you think all Muslims will be banned? The courts already shot that shit down.
Has Comrade defeated ISIS in a month as he promised?
How about that Obamacare repeal and replacement on Day One.
Trump: 0- presidency.

Time for another campaign tour because we all know the Deplorables don't know any of the above is happening.
They think there's still a Muslim ban.