Desperate Dems Try to Smear Moore, But O.K. With This...

[Luddly Neddite]

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Maybe, but all the homos in the crowd were sure getting horny

Are you making the moronic suggestion that homos are also pedophiles?

If you asked Milo he'd certainly attest to that.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that darling of RWNJs.

But how does ONE prove that ALL are the same?

It doesn't.

Why are you RWNJs trying so hard to change the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Maybe, but all the homos in the crowd were sure getting horny

Are you making the moronic suggestion that homos are also pedophiles?

If you asked Milo he'd certainly attest to that.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that darling of RWNJs.

But how does ONE prove that ALL are the same?

It doesn't.

Why are you RWNJs trying so hard to change the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Because Milo said it was common practice?

 

[tinydancer]

I love this story . After all the smug “libs are pedophiles” threads this week it’s a hoot to watch the cons eat shit . Like perverts are a lib or con thing .

But even better, these accusations are lies ! Lol. Like that psycho Moore guy would be above such things !

Especially since the left gets rid of their weirdos, such as Weiner. RWNJs, especially the fundie bible thumpers, will tell every lie they can think of to protect slime.

Even though Ted Poopy Pants Convicted Poacher Admitted Pedo Nugent event wrote a song talking about 13 year olds. That really smarmy old fart on Duck Dynasty preached it to his fundie nutter church.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

You're such a wanker. There have been a lot of songs written about young girls asshole.

Top 10 Jailbait Songs

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Tell us what's wrong with a young boy marching in a parade. This should be good.

++++++++++++

Personally, I have never had any luck getting one of these liberal cocksuckers to answer a question; hell they don't even respond to topics....deflection, I believe it is called.

But, if any one wants to respond, I would like to ask how an 8 year old boy decides, at such a tender age, that he wants to spend his life with a dick in his ass?

Excuse the crude language, but it is a legitimate question.

It seems to me he has some creatures raising him who need to be Horsewhipped at least; probably jailed.

++++++++++++++++

Ok idiot, read slowly, because i am going to answer your question with simple terms meant for an idiot:

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Then explain to me why homo parades are always full of butt bandits wearing leather chaps with no pants.

That makes no sense, as a follow up question. But I have noticed that this is definitely one of your favorite topics.

Wow.....vague accusations of homosexuality with no proof to back it up.
Now why does that sound so familiar.......all ya gotta do is replace homosexuality with hookers and peeing and it all comes into focus. Weird huh?

[\QUOTE]
[\quote]



"hookers and peeing"

Why bring trump into this?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Reasonable]

40 years ago and somehow we are supposed to believe the story just came out now? with her two best friends and mommy backing her story? Please...

Obviously you don’t understand the trauma a child goes thru when molested by an adult.
I’d bet big money if a young boy accused Hillary of something like this you’d pull a 180.

 

[Aletheia4u]

Desperate Democrats are trying every last lowlife trick in the book to smear Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore...but liberals alright with this...

 

[Luddly Neddite]

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Maybe, but all the homos in the crowd were sure getting horny

Are you making the moronic suggestion that homos are also pedophiles?

If you asked Milo he'd certainly attest to that.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that darling of RWNJs.

But how does ONE prove that ALL are the same?

It doesn't.

Why are you RWNJs trying so hard to change the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Because Milo said it was common practice?

"Milo said"?

And first you said "all" but now you're saying your witty little hero says "it's common practice".

You're failing.

Why not just stick to the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Reasonable]

Liberals are making false claims

Proof?

False claims have no proof

+++++++++++++++++++

Here is a typical exchange with one of these half-wit liberals.

The half-wit insist on "proof" that the man didn't do what he is suddenly accused of doing 34 years ago....which we happen to be hearing about from a Democratic Pravda suddenly.....for the first time...just before an election.

Fuck the Presumption of innocence....which had to only grow over 34 of silence....says this goofy half-wit.

He knows as we all know; and as the Washington Post most certainly knows that the man cannot possibly disprove these sudden 34 year old accusations...the issue, as The Washinton Post certainly knows is what counts is if the allegation will shave off enough votes to beat him.

Nobody will know the truth before the election.

The Washington Post knows something else.

That it is owned by a Hardcore Democrat who is the richest man in the world; that if the man is defeated and sues the Washington Post....no judgement the jury can ever award will amount to much more than pocket change to them.

It means the Washington Post has no constraints; it is beyond the law----and it is highly partison, rabidly so---and thus cannot be trusted.

In a larger sense, it means a few very rich men can control the country.

The post heard many people whispering about this story. It’s an Alabama legend. So they pursued it and found it had legs. Giant legs.
I bet you think all 16 women that have come forward saying Trump molested them since that Access Hollywood time period are all making it up. Right?
All 16.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

++++++++++++

Personally, I have never had any luck getting one of these liberal cocksuckers to answer a question; hell they don't even respond to topics....deflection, I believe it is called.

But, if any one wants to respond, I would like to ask how an 8 year old boy decides, at such a tender age, that he wants to spend his life with a dick in his ass?

Excuse the crude language, but it is a legitimate question.

It seems to me he has some creatures raising him who need to be Horsewhipped at least; probably jailed.

++++++++++++++++

Ok idiot, read slowly, because i am going to answer your question with simple terms meant for an idiot:

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Then explain to me why homo parades are always full of butt bandits wearing leather chaps with no pants.

That makes no sense, as a follow up question. But I have noticed that this is definitely one of your favorite topics.

Wow.....vague accusations of homosexuality with no proof to back it up.
Now why does that sound so familiar.......all ya gotta do is replace homosexuality with hookers and peeing and it all comes into focus. Weird huh?

[\QUOTE]
[\quote]



"hookers and peeing"

Why bring trump into this?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

HereWeGoAgain said "hookers and peeing"

Why bring trump into this?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Maybe, but all the homos in the crowd were sure getting horny

Are you making the moronic suggestion that homos are also pedophiles?

If you asked Milo he'd certainly attest to that.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that darling of RWNJs.

But how does ONE prove that ALL are the same?

It doesn't.

Why are you RWNJs trying so hard to change the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Because Milo said it was common practice?

"Milo said"?

And first you said "all" but now you're saying your witty little hero says "it's common practice".

You're failing.

Why not just stick to the subject?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

You have no answers.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Wait a minute...Conservatives are fine with smear campaigns against liberals whereby someone emerges from the "woodwork" to accuse a prominent (to a more or lesser degree) figure of illegal temerarious and turpitudinous behavior, yet are up in arms when the same thing happens to a conservative???

Am I the only here who sees the problem as that of our society condoning people trying their cases in the court of public opinion rather than and before doing so in a court of law? My response to all these people making their character impugning accusations about the illegal acts they allege prominent figures have made against them is the same: go to the police and file an affidavit, thereby putting themselves on the line for perjury (and the legal penalties thereunto) should it be found that their claim(s) are specious.

To the general public that seems almost literally to feed on and feel compelled to make something of news of such things, I say, "get a life" because to the extent that one has not succeeded in achieving everything one has wanted in one's personal goals, one, without question, has better things to do than be a consumer of or contributor to discussions about another's alleged transgressions. For instance:

• If one dreams of enjoying a middle class, upper middle class or wealthy lifestyle and one has not yet achieved that, one has something better to do.
• If one's kids are not "straight A" students, one has something better to do.
• If one aspires to have sex on steps of the U.S. Capitol, one has something better to do.
• If one doesn't have a "bucket list," or has uncompleted tasks on one's "bucket list," one also has something better to do.
• If one is committed to being a Christian, one most certainly has something better to do.
  • "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone." -- John 8:7
  • "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them." -- Matthew 7:12
  • “But watch yourselves lest your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and cares of this life, and that day come upon you suddenly like a trap." -- Luke 21:34
    
  • "These are grumblers, malcontents, following their own sinful desires; they are loud-mouthed boasters, showing favoritism to gain advantage." -- Jude 1:16
  • "Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God." -- Galatians 5:19-21

By all means the transgressions of reprobates deserve to be rebuked and punished, but as one who's not party to them, it's not my or your place to do so, and as Christians, it most certainly is not either of our places. Now who is and isn't a Christian? For the most part, I don't know, but I know that each and every one of us knows whether we construe ourselves thus, and that knowledge alone calls each of us to pursue the "something better to do" that entails letting the parties involved -- law enforcement officials, the alleged offenders and those whom they are alleged to have wronged -- resolve the various matters of an alleged offender's transgressions. It is our duty as Christians to refrain from the boorishly tiresome pursuit of using the occasion of someone's offense and misfortune to make "political hay."

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I love this story . After all the smug “libs are pedophiles” threads this week it’s a hoot to watch the cons eat shit . Like perverts are a lib or con thing .

But even better, these accusations are lies ! Lol. Like that psycho Moore guy would be above such things !

Especially since the left gets rid of their weirdos, such as Weiner. RWNJs, especially the fundie bible thumpers, will tell every lie they can think of to protect slime.

Even though Ted Poopy Pants Convicted Poacher Admitted Pedo Nugent event wrote a song talking about 13 year olds. That really smarmy old fart on Duck Dynasty preached it to his fundie nutter church.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

You're such a wanker. There have been a lot of songs written about young girls asshole.

Top 10 Jailbait Songs

Are they all RWNJ fundie heros?

And Jesus h fcuking christ - learn to use the

comma, asshole.

Like that^^

Understand?



Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[tinydancer]

Liberals are making false claims

Proof?

False claims have no proof

+++++++++++++++++++

Here is a typical exchange with one of these half-wit liberals.

The half-wit insist on "proof" that the man didn't do what he is suddenly accused of doing 34 years ago....which we happen to be hearing about from a Democratic Pravda suddenly.....for the first time...just before an election.

Fuck the Presumption of innocence....which had to only grow over 34 of silence....says this goofy half-wit.

He knows as we all know; and as the Washington Post most certainly knows that the man cannot possibly disprove these sudden 34 year old accusations...the issue, as The Washinton Post certainly knows is what counts is if the allegation will shave off enough votes to beat him.

Nobody will know the truth before the election.

The Washington Post knows something else.

That it is owned by a Hardcore Democrat who is the richest man in the world; that if the man is defeated and sues the Washington Post....no judgement the jury can ever award will amount to much more than pocket change to them.

It means the Washington Post has no constraints; it is beyond the law----and it is highly partison, rabidly so---and thus cannot be trusted.

In a larger sense, it means a few very rich men can control the country.

The post heard many people whispering about this story. It’s an Alabama legend. So they pursued it and found it had legs. Giant legs.
I bet you think all 16 women that have come forward saying Trump molested them since that Access Hollywood time period are all making it up. Right?
All 16.

All were discredited. I particularly loved the porn star who accused Trump right after she launched her sex toy website. Mega free publicity.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Ok idiot, read slowly, because i am going to answer your question with simple terms meant for an idiot:

8 year old homosexuals are not thinking about sex anymore than 8 year old heterosexuals are.

Then explain to me why homo parades are always full of butt bandits wearing leather chaps with no pants.

That makes no sense, as a follow up question. But I have noticed that this is definitely one of your favorite topics.

Wow.....vague accusations of homosexuality with no proof to back it up.
Now why does that sound so familiar.......all ya gotta do is replace homosexuality with hookers and peeing and it all comes into focus. Weird huh?

[\QUOTE]
[\quote]



"hookers and peeing"

Why bring trump into this?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

HereWeGoAgain said "hookers and peeing"

Why bring trump into this?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Sorry you lack the intelligence to recognise nuance when it's right in front of you.

 

[Rambunctious]

Obviously you don’t understand the trauma a child goes thru when molested by an adult.
I’d bet big money if a young boy accused Hillary of something like this you’d pull a 180.

I know if it was as traumatic as you want to portray she would have said something sooner...It's not like the dude was hiding. It's bullshit...mark my words. I know more about this story than is being reported. The post is going to get sued.

 

[Rambunctious]

The post heard many people whispering about this story. It’s an Alabama legend. So they pursued it and found it had legs. Giant legs.
I bet you think all 16 women that have come forward saying Trump molested them since that Access Hollywood time period are all making it up. Right?
All 16.

you are a liar....

 

[ClosedCaption]

Desperate Democrats are trying every last lowlife trick in the book to smear Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore...but liberals alright with this...

It' nit a smear. Trying to bang a 14 year old is generally objected to no matter what party you belong to

 

[Aletheia4u]

Wait a minute...Conservatives are fine with smear campaigns against liberals whereby someone emerges from the "woodwork" to accuse a prominent (to a more or lesser degree) figure of illegal temerarious and turpitudinous behavior, yet are up in arms when the same thing happens to a conservative???

Am I the only here who sees the problem as that of our society condoning people trying their cases in the court of public opinion rather and before doing so in a court of law? My response to all these people making their character impugning accusations about the illegal acts prominent figures have made is the same: go to the police and file an affidavit, thereby putting themselves on the line for perjury (and the legal penalties thereunto) should it be found that their claim(s) are specious.

To the general public that seems almost literally to feed on feel compelled to make something of news of such things, I say, "get a life" because to the extent that one has not succeeded in achieving everything one has wanted in one's personal goals, one, without question, has better things to do than be a consumer of or contributor to discussions about another's alleged transgressions. For instance:

• If one dreams of enjoying a middle class, upper middle class or wealthy lifestyle and one has not yet achieved that, one has something better to do.
• If one's kids are not "straight A" students, one has something better to do.
• If one aspires to have sex on steps of the U.S. Capitol, one has something better to do.
• If one doesn't have a "bucket list," or has uncompleted task on one's "bucket list," one also has something better to do.
• If one is committed to being a Christian, one most certainly has something better to do.
  • "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone." -- John 8:7
  • "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them." -- Matthew 7:12
  • “But watch yourselves lest your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and cares of this life, and that day come upon you suddenly like a trap." -- Luke 21:34
    
  • "These are grumblers, malcontents, following their own sinful desires; they are loud-mouthed boasters, showing favoritism to gain advantage." -- Jude 1:16
  • "Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God." -- Galatians 5:19-21

By all means the transgressions of reprobates deserve to be rebuked and punished, but as one who's not party to them, it's not my or your place to do so, and as Christians, it most certainly is not either of our places. Now who is and isn't a Christian? For the most part, I don't know, but I know that each and every one of us knows whether we construe ourselves thus, and that knowledge alone calls each of us to pursue the "something better to do" that entails letting the parties involved -- law enforcement officials, the alleged offenders and those whom they are alleged to have wronged -- resolve the various matters of an alleged offender's transgressions. It is our duty as Christians to refrain from using the occasion of someone's offense and misfortune to make "political hay."

There were never a smear campaign on Liberals. It was always the truth about them. They loves little boys and girls.


This little girl communicating to Weiner on her computer.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Liberals are making false claims

Proof?

False claims have no proof

+++++++++++++++++++

Here is a typical exchange with one of these half-wit liberals.

The half-wit insist on "proof" that the man didn't do what he is suddenly accused of doing 34 years ago....which we happen to be hearing about from a Democratic Pravda suddenly.....for the first time...just before an election.

Fuck the Presumption of innocence....which had to only grow over 34 of silence....says this goofy half-wit.

He knows as we all know; and as the Washington Post most certainly knows that the man cannot possibly disprove these sudden 34 year old accusations...the issue, as The Washinton Post certainly knows is what counts is if the allegation will shave off enough votes to beat him.

Nobody will know the truth before the election.

The Washington Post knows something else.

That it is owned by a Hardcore Democrat who is the richest man in the world; that if the man is defeated and sues the Washington Post....no judgement the jury can ever award will amount to much more than pocket change to them.

It means the Washington Post has no constraints; it is beyond the law----and it is highly partison, rabidly so---and thus cannot be trusted.

In a larger sense, it means a few very rich men can control the country.

The post heard many people whispering about this story. It’s an Alabama legend. So they pursued it and found it had legs. Giant legs.
I bet you think all 16 women that have come forward saying Trump molested them since that Access Hollywood time period are all making it up. Right?
All 16.

It's horrifying to watch RWs rush to lie and make excuses for this human garbage, but they always do.

Imagine if they have children who are hearing this and hearing their family's reaction.

What if they are being molested, molested or worse? Or, what if they have a friend who needs help?

Is it any wonder that children and women keep quiet? How many children and women have put their heads down and kept their secret?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Rambunctious]

This shit doesn't work any more...it's a desperation move by Bezos and left wing nut jobs....Hey libs!!!! you have worn this one out get a new playbook!