Si modo
Diamond Member
There are also those whose position is that the state of the science does not allow for any conclusion about the magnitude and significance of anthropogenic CO2.What is a denier denying?What a bullshit, nothing comment. That isn't being taught and only goes to prove that the deniers only have the political option to go with, having failed miserably in proving the science wrong.
Well, depends on the flavor of the denier.
Some state that there is no warming at all. That there is a vast conspriracy to misinform the public worldwide.
Others state that the warming is occurring, but is from natural causes. But they cannot point out any of the causes.
Others fly in the face of established physics, and state that CO2, CH4, and the rest of the GHGs really do not affect anything when they are in the atmosphere.
And then there are some that claim scientific credentials, and just mewl and puke about logic, and never say a thing that they can be pinned down on.
Obviously, when a warmer says 'denier', that means anyone who doesn't buy into the logic of scientific discovery.
Yeah, that makes sense.