Dems Continue To Provide Evidence This Has Been One Coup Attempt After Another From Day 1

[easyt65]

One of the Lawyers Testifying for Democrats Called for Impeachment of Trump in...2017


(This is the criminal POS, BTW, who demanded the US AG - the leading Law ENFORCER in the US -
BREAK THE LAW...and who led the successful Dem effort to CENSURE the US AG for REFUSING TO
BREAK THE LAW in an earlier failed Coup Attempt.)


"Late yesterday House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler released the witness list for tomorrow's impeachment inquiry hearing to "discuss the historical and constitutional basic of impeachment, as well as the Framers' intent and understanding of terms like 'high crimes and misdemeanors.'"

On it: Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman, George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan and University of North Carolina Law professor Michael Gerhardt.

But back in September 2017, Feldman called for President Trump's impeachment in a piece for the New York Review. Feldman based his argument on "collusion" between Trump's presidential campaign and Russia.

According to the Mueller investigation, that collusion never happened."


Leave it to Nadler to confirm to America - before he and his House Non-Judicial Committee even convenes to take up the 'torch' from Schiff to continued the already exposed Coup 2.0 effort- that the House refuses to accept the Mueller (WEISMANN Witch Hunt / Collusion Delusion 1.0 : Russia), and this latest 'Impeachment' push is nothing more than a continuation of Obama's original failed coup attempt.



One of the Lawyers Testifying for Democrats Called for Impeachment of Trump in...2017


.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm still waiting for Trump to hit back

 

[william the wie]

At this point I don't know if Pelosi can buy enough D house members to win impeachment. If she can will her victory be worse than certain defeat in the senate?
Bloomberg and CNBC are reporting that that valuations are being skewed because the little guys are getting the returns that Trump promised.

 

[BULLDOG]

It's a good thing that IG report is coming out to prove you are right -------- OH, WAIT!!!

 

[Fueri]

Of course Nadler will trot out partisan hacks.

Never had a doubt.....

 

[BlindBoo]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

 

[william the wie]

With this stunt the Ds are dumbing down to their stereotype

 

[MeBelle]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Fortunately, the House is not using any type of Constitutional method in conducting this Faux Impeachment.

Secret , closed door 'testimony' is not a part of due process.

 

[easyt65]

It's a good thing that IG report is coming out to prove you are right -------- OH, WAIT!!!

Poor lil' snowflake.....you actually need a report to tell you what has already been confirmed by official documents, personal conspirator texts, testimony under oath, etc.... as if skillful political wordsmything could suddenly make all that evidence of Democrat crime / coup attempts go away.....

I forgot how you have to wait for someone to tell you what to think, what happened, what the actual report says because you can't figure it out for yourself - like how snowflakes need 'liberal translation' to decide that Biden's videotaped confession of extorting the former UK Prime Minister was ACTUALLY a 'metaphor'...or 'political parody' ... rather than what it is - a videotaped confession.

 

[The Original Tree]

One of the Lawyers Testifying for Democrats Called for Impeachment of Trump in...2017


(This is the criminal POS, BTW, who demanded the US AG - the leading Law ENFORCER in the US -
BREAK THE LAW...and who led the successful Dem effort to CENSURE the US AG for REFUSING TO
BREAK THE LAW in an earlier failed Coup Attempt.)


"Late yesterday House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler released the witness list for tomorrow's impeachment inquiry hearing to "discuss the historical and constitutional basic of impeachment, as well as the Framers' intent and understanding of terms like 'high crimes and misdemeanors.'"

On it: Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman, George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan and University of North Carolina Law professor Michael Gerhardt.

But back in September 2017, Feldman called for President Trump's impeachment in a piece for the New York Review. Feldman based his argument on "collusion" between Trump's presidential campaign and Russia.

According to the Mueller investigation, that collusion never happened."


Leave it to Nadler to confirm to America - before he and his House Non-Judicial Committee even convenes to take up the 'torch' from Schiff to continued the already exposed Coup 2.0 effort- that the House refuses to accept the Mueller (WEISMANN Witch Hunt / Collusion Delusion 1.0 : Russia), and this latest 'Impeachment' push is nothing more than a continuation of Obama's original failed coup attempt.



One of the Lawyers Testifying for Democrats Called for Impeachment of Trump in...2017


.

Add this ASSHOLE to the Senate Witness List if this even gets that far.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

 

[The Original Tree]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Putin gives TWO THUMBS UP!

 

[The Original Tree]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

And he said our elections were unhackable and he knew this because he tried to hack them himself and failed and then tried to lobby to allow The Federal Government to take control of all the voting booths. He failed at that too.

Now why would he do that, and after failing at that, then go to Putin and ask to buy Russian Propaganda to use to defeat President Trump with?

 

[BlindBoo]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

 

[BlindBoo]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Fortunately, the House is not using any type of Constitutional method in conducting this Faux Impeachment.

Secret , closed door 'testimony' is not a part of due process.

That's funny. It is up to the House on how to conduct their Impeachment process. Not the Senate. Not the White House.

Closed door session are not secret, Republicans on the committees were all allowed in the hearings and questioning. Unlike Trey Gowdy's investigation where they did interview several witnesses without the Democrats on the committees being present.

Did you miss the televised testimony?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

If HRC won we would never hear the words "Russia Collusion".

 

[BlindBoo]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

If HRC won we would never hear the words "Russia Collusion".

We would have been mired in Benghazi again and again for the first two years, hell they might have already Impeached her by now if she won.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

If HRC won we would never hear the words "Russia Collusion".

We would have been mired in Benghazi again and again for the first two years, hell they might have already Impeached her by now if she won.

How when they don't control the house?

 

[BlindBoo]

Removing a corrupt president by the prescribed Constitutional method of Impeachment in the House and Trial by the Senate is not a coup. Nor is it an attempted overthrow of our Government.

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

If HRC won we would never hear the words "Russia Collusion".

We would have been mired in Benghazi again and again for the first two years, hell they might have already Impeached her by now if she won.

How when they don't control the house?

They controlled it in 2017-18.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Funny how Obama only became concerned with Russian interference after HRC lost....he was the POTUS during the interference.

He was more concerned with bipartisanship when told the Republican Leadership about the hack attack and wanted to take the information public. He shouldn't have asked for their support, by then he should have known they wanted to benefit from the Russian attack as well. Never thought I'd see the day when Republicans tout Russian Propaganda over our own intelligence agencies.

If HRC won we would never hear the words "Russia Collusion".

We would have been mired in Benghazi again and again for the first two years, hell they might have already Impeached her by now if she won.

How when they don't control the house?

They controlled it in 2017-18.

They did and you think they would have gone after HRC and the emails? I am curious if you're right. You may be.