- Aug 4, 2009
- 283,592
- 151,942
- 2,615
1. As conservative, i.e., I behave with civility, I try not to toss around the term 'lie.'
2. If you change that indictment to 'was incorrect in his usage' and provide a link, I might subscribe to same.
3. Now, look at you stamp your little feet, and squench your eyes closed so you can ignore the data on national debt.
4. If only you had the gift of irony, you'd be as amused as I when anyone uses the phrase " want to discredit the Clinton administration..."
How can anyone 'discredit' a rapist moreso than the rapist himself???
And, you don't realize what a brain-dead automaton you are becoming. Get a grip, wingy.
George Bush stood in front of the American people and said it was not just for the Government to take in more money than it needs (surplus). He insisted on a tax cut to give that money back.
Now, by your own assertion, he was wrong, there was no surplus to justify his tax cut.
Now, there are two possibilities
He is a "know nothing" (your term) and got the budget numbers wrong
He knew there was no surplus and lied to get his tax cut
By changing he subject, I assume that means that you realize you've lost....
No Clinton surplus.
No?
Allahu Akbar.
You are ducking the question..
As we all know, cowardice is a sign of conservatism
What was the justification of your messiah, George Bush telling the American people that he had been given a budget surplus?
Was he lying like most conservative leaders or just a "know-nothing"
And since the tax cut was not warranted, don't you think we should repeal it?