Democrats Courageously Defend The Rights Of Illegal Immigrant Drunk Drivers

Lordy, dude. Yet you don’t understand that Biden and the Dems / Socialists violate basic premises of the Constitution; national sovereignty, rule of law, with their open borders and protection of criminal illegals.

Often times they do. Obama did it all the time with his spying on the citizens. I condemned it. He did it when he targeted U.S. citizens for death without giving them due process. I condemned it.
 
Mandatory e-verify with actual enforcement would do that all on it's own. I'm sure you'll still come up with some excuse though.

Desantis passed this but it seems he has little desire to actually enforce it. Business gets what business wants.

As long as business can ignore the laws, I support the same for everyone.

here you go meathead, notice deep state DEM GOVTs refuse to comply. Again you own it all you thick lipped ape.

  • States that require all or most employers to use E-Verify: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, MississippiNorth Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah.
  • Public employers and/or contractors with the state: Florida, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
  • Public employers only: Idaho and Virginia.
 
That fact that some employers are hiring illegals doesn’t negate the fact that the illegals broke the law. In the case of drunk driving, at least 2 times. Once when they came into the country illegally and again when they drove drunk, probably without a license.

For some strange reason, Democrats don’t have any interest punishing illegal immigrants.

Nor does anyone have any desire to punish their employers. I am of the mind that if some can escape punishment, all should be able to .
 
Mandatory e-verify with actual enforcement would do that all on it's own. I'm sure you'll still come up with some excuse though.

Desantis passed this but it seems he has little desire to actually enforce it. Business gets what business wants.

As long as business can ignore the laws, I support the same for everyone.

Ergo, as long as illegals ignore the laws, you should support the same for business. Doesn’t sound very logical when you flip it around does it? That’s because it isn’t.
 
Ergo, as long as illegals ignore the laws, you should support the same for business. Doesn’t sound very logical when you flip it around does it? That’s because it isn’t.

I support enforcing the law on EVERYONE. We are NOT enforcing it on employers. Hence my position.
 
That fact that some employers are hiring illegals doesn’t negate the fact that the illegals broke the law. In the case of drunk driving, at least 2 times. Once when they came into the country illegally and again when they drove drunk, probably without a license.

For some strange reason, Democrats don’t have any interest punishing illegal immigrants.


If someone is criminally convicted, pleads or is found guilty of drunk driving, they should be expelled from the the country no questions asked. Automatic. And if a DUI defendant agrees to plead guilty and accept immediate deportation, rather than sit in stir until the trial, that's fine too.
 
Nor does anyone have any desire to punish their employers. I am of the mind that if some can escape punishment, all should be able to .

No you aren’t, you just haven’t thought it through. Illegals are breaking the law but you aren’t in support of businesses doing the same. It is the old chicken and the egg argument. You are chasing your tail.
 
The Federal government became in the habit of not paying a penny for the costs to the states. Some states said "screw that". There is no Federal jail to hold illegals so it was on the state to do so. Not being able to afford that they quit trying.

That’s a really weak excuse for Dem / Socialist run states and cities that actively prevent ICE, a federal agency, from performing the function of law enforcement.

It’s just ridiculous to claim that states are unable to temporarily hold criminal illegals until ICE (you didn’t know ICE was a federal agency), can collect them.

How do you explain Dem / Socialist sanctuary cities refusing to cooperate with ICE?
 
I support enforcing the law on EVERYONE. We are NOT enforcing it on employers. Hence my position.

We aren’t enforcing it on illegals either. What is your point?
 
No you aren’t, you just haven’t thought it through. Illegals are breaking the law but you aren’t in support of businesses doing the same. It is the old chicken and the egg argument. You are chasing your tail.

Enforce the laws on business and a large number of illegals simply leave. I then would support very strong enforcement on those who decide not to leave.
 
That’s a really weak excuse for Dem / Socialist run states and cities that actively prevent ICE, a federal agency, from performing the function of law enforcement.

Impossible.
 
We aren’t enforcing it on illegals either. What is your point?

I've made my point more than once. What's the point of deporting someone when they can simply turn around and return to their job?
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA
How about the Illegals' landlords or bartenders?

Should they be sued as well?

The mayor of the tremendous city of Hazleton PA tried to institute such a law and libs objected.

If Illegals can't find a place to rent and aren't allowed in the local watering hole to wet their whistle, they are less like to want to come to America.
 
How about the Illegals' landlords or bartenders?

Should they be sued as well?

Quite possibly. Did the bartender check I.D.?

One does not necessarily have to provide I.D. to rent off someone.

We could pass laws to that affect I suppose.


The mayor of the tremendous city of Hazleton PA tried to institute such a law and libs objected.

If Illegals can't find a place to rent and aren't allowed in the local watering hole to wet their whistle, they are less like to want to come to America.

They come for jobs. They can buy beer at Wal-Mart.
 
Enforce the laws on business and a large number of illegals simply leave. I then would support very strong enforcement on those who decide not to leave.

they turn to increased Crime. Drug sales. Stolen cars. Shoplifting. No bail DEM make it easier on them to operate. See LA, CA for examples in the millions.
 
Quite possibly. Did the bartender check I.D.?

One does not necessarily have to provide I.D. to rent off someone.

We could pass laws to that affect I suppose.




They come for jobs. They can buy beer at Wal-Mart.


Not in Pennsylvania they can't. No beer at the Walmarts in the Commonwealth.

If an illegal is required to present ID for a job, why shouldn't they be forced to for a rental or to be served in a joint?
 
Impossible.

That was an impossibly inept sidestep.

Dem / Marxist sanctuary cities and states habitually protect their criminal illegals by refusing to cooperate with ICE. You were given multiple examples.

There was a time when rule of law was a priority, back in 2018, for exampke.



Release Date: February 15, 2018
Non-cooperative jurisdictions that do not honor U.S. Immigration and Customs (ICE) detainer requests to hold criminal aliens who are already in their custody, endanger the public and threaten officer safety by releasing criminal aliens back into the community to re-offend. In addition to causing preventable crimes, this creates another “pull factor” that increases illegal immigration.
 
they turn to increased Crime. Drug sales. Stolen cars. Shoplifting. No bail DEM make it easier on them to operate. See LA, CA for examples in the millions.

Enforce the law on business and I'll support strong enforcement on the people. I do not speak for others.
 

Forum List

Back
Top