Democrats are not very civil

[DiveCon]

hooked.

read the bullshit before and attach your WTF then get some creds.

i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either

and divecon shutteth down.

read the ridiculous post of bucs90 and compare it to the post of sallow.

you would find it very funny if it was reversed and posted by mad scientist.

you mean the ones that came AFTER his, and are actually not too far from the truth?

 

[L.K.Eder]

To understand liberals, you must understand the nature of the left wing. They believe in powerful government to force the people into the mold of society they feel is best. Take some examples of when a left wing ideology blossoms into a far left ideology:

Communist Russia, Communist North Korea, Communist Cuba, Communist Venezuela, and of course, the National SOCIALIST Party of Germany.

To their extreme, the left is extremely militant, brutal, controlling. They must be, as that is the only way to bring about total equality in all walks of life, which is the goal of modern liberalism. Total equality can't be achieved without overwhelming force or threat of. It's why drill instructors yell so much.

To understand Conservatives, you must understand the nature of the Right wing. They believe in a Nexus of a powerful one party government coupled with corporations and religion to force the people into the mold of society they feel is best. Take some examples of when right wing ideology blossoms into a far right ideology:

The many monarchies in Europe, Fascist Italy, Saudi Arabia, and of course, the NAZI Party of Germany. Hitler being one of the most religious conservative corporatists of all.

To their extreme, the right is extremely militant, brutal, controlling. They must be, as that is the only way to bring about total power to elites they believe get their power from a supreme being, which is the goal of modern Conservatism. Total supremacy of those they deem superior can't be achieved without overwhelming force or threat of. It's why drill instructors yell so much.

i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either

and divecon shutteth down.

read the ridiculous post of bucs90 and compare it to the post of sallow.

you would find it very funny if it was reversed and posted by mad scientist.

you mean the ones that came AFTER his, and are actually not too far from the truth?

you agree with one but not with the other.

you go WTF with the persiflage.

no creds.

 

[DiveCon]

To understand liberals, you must understand the nature of the left wing. They believe in powerful government to force the people into the mold of society they feel is best. Take some examples of when a left wing ideology blossoms into a far left ideology:

Communist Russia, Communist North Korea, Communist Cuba, Communist Venezuela, and of course, the National SOCIALIST Party of Germany.

To their extreme, the left is extremely militant, brutal, controlling. They must be, as that is the only way to bring about total equality in all walks of life, which is the goal of modern liberalism. Total equality can't be achieved without overwhelming force or threat of. It's why drill instructors yell so much.

To understand Conservatives, you must understand the nature of the Right wing. They believe in a Nexus of a powerful one party government coupled with corporations and religion to force the people into the mold of society they feel is best. Take some examples of when right wing ideology blossoms into a far right ideology:

The many monarchies in Europe, Fascist Italy, Saudi Arabia, and of course, the NAZI Party of Germany. Hitler being one of the most religious conservative corporatists of all.

To their extreme, the right is extremely militant, brutal, controlling. They must be, as that is the only way to bring about total power to elites they believe get their power from a supreme being, which is the goal of modern Conservatism. Total supremacy of those they deem superior can't be achieved without overwhelming force or threat of. It's why drill instructors yell so much.

and divecon shutteth down.

read the ridiculous post of bucs90 and compare it to the post of sallow.

you would find it very funny if it was reversed and posted by mad scientist.

you mean the ones that came AFTER his, and are actually not too far from the truth?

you agree with one but not with the other.

you go WTF with the persiflage.

no creds.

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

 

[L.K.Eder]

To understand liberals, you must understand the nature of the left wing. They believe in powerful government to force the people into the mold of society they feel is best. Take some examples of when a left wing ideology blossoms into a far left ideology:

Communist Russia, Communist North Korea, Communist Cuba, Communist Venezuela, and of course, the National SOCIALIST Party of Germany.

To their extreme, the left is extremely militant, brutal, controlling. They must be, as that is the only way to bring about total equality in all walks of life, which is the goal of modern liberalism. Total equality can't be achieved without overwhelming force or threat of. It's why drill instructors yell so much.

you mean the ones that came AFTER his, and are actually not too far from the truth?

you agree with one but not with the other.

you go WTF with the persiflage.

no creds.

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

the ridiculous nature of the first post gave rise to the mocking second post.

you agree with the ridiculous first post.

you were appalled by the ridiculous second post.

you swallowed it hook line sinker yacht and quay.

right now you are chewing it.

bon appetit.

 

[DiveCon]

you agree with one but not with the other.

you go WTF with the persiflage.

no creds.

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

the ridiculous nature of the first post gave rise to the mocking second post.

you agree with the ridiculous first post.

you were appalled by the ridiculous second post.

you swallowed it hook line sinker yacht and quay.

right now you are chewing it.

bon appetit.

nope
i didnt see the first post till you reposted it
and then it wasnt so ridiculous
the second one in mocking made no sense at all
you can eat your own hook line and sinker

 

[L.K.Eder]

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

the ridiculous nature of the first post gave rise to the mocking second post.

you agree with the ridiculous first post.

you were appalled by the ridiculous second post.

you swallowed it hook line sinker yacht and quay.

right now you are chewing it.

bon appetit.

nope
i didnt see the first post till you reposted it
and then it wasnt so ridiculous
the second one in mocking made no sense at all
you can eat your own hook line and sinker

the whole exercise could have been very short if you had actually read the not so long thread. and if you had not explicitly stated that you had read it.

"i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either "

 

[DiveCon]

the ridiculous nature of the first post gave rise to the mocking second post.

you agree with the ridiculous first post.

you were appalled by the ridiculous second post.

you swallowed it hook line sinker yacht and quay.

right now you are chewing it.

bon appetit.

nope
i didnt see the first post till you reposted it
and then it wasnt so ridiculous
the second one in mocking made no sense at all
you can eat your own hook line and sinker

the whole exercise could have been very short if you had actually read the not so long thread. and if you had not explicitly stated that you had read it.

"i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either "

not all of it
the part i highlighted on sallow's post was dead on
and you only want to ignore the truth

 

[L.K.Eder]

nope
i didnt see the first post till you reposted it
and then it wasnt so ridiculous
the second one in mocking made no sense at all
you can eat your own hook line and sinker

the whole exercise could have been very short if you had actually read the not so long thread. and if you had not explicitly stated that you had read it.

"i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either "

not all of it
the part i highlighted on sallow's post was dead on
and you only want to ignore the truth

yeah, you got me there.

i am the one ignoring the truth.

how did you find me out.

 

[DiveCon]

the whole exercise could have been very short if you had actually read the not so long thread. and if you had not explicitly stated that you had read it.

"i did read it
and my WTF stands

what he posted is totally fucking bullshit and if you actually believe that, you have no fucking clue either "

not all of it
the part i highlighted on sallow's post was dead on
and you only want to ignore the truth

yeah, you got me there.

i am the one ignoring the truth.

how did you find me out.

its not hard to do

 

[gekaap]

Aside from these contributions, I'm declaring this thread Godwin'd.

 

[L.K.Eder]

not all of it
the part i highlighted on sallow's post was dead on
and you only want to ignore the truth

yeah, you got me there.

i am the one ignoring the truth.

how did you find me out.

its not hard to do

coinkidinkilly your lame deflection and incompetence at recognizing and admitting your blunders has become tiresome,

this is now the time on USMB vhen ve dance

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, you got me there.

i am the one ignoring the truth.

how did you find me out.

its not hard to do

coinkidinkilly your lame deflection and incompetence at recognizing and admitting your blunders has become tiresome,

this is now the time on USMB vhen ve dance

i made no blunder
but you can continue to dance like you won something

 

[JFK_USA]

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

And so did the framers of the constitution which scrapped the Aritcles of Confederation for the great constitution that ever Republican knows and according to every republican, liberals are socialist american hating communists.

But if the founding fathers and liberals were on the same page, wouldn't it stand to reason that republicans hate america?

BTW, those democrats are acting like republcans did for 4 years. Obstruct. Obstruct Obstruct. Doesn't feel too good when the shoe is on the other foot now is it?

 

[DiveCon]

but it IS true, many liberals DO want a strong powerful central government

And so did the framers of the constitution which scrapped the Aritcles of Confederation for the great constitution that ever Republican knows and according to every republican, liberals are socialist american hating communists.

But if the founding fathers and liberals were on the same page, wouldn't it stand to reason that republicans hate america?

BTW, those democrats are acting like republcans did for 4 years. Obstruct. Obstruct Obstruct. Doesn't feel too good when the shoe is on the other foot now is it?

ha, that shoe was on the other foot for 6 years before the GOP put it on
LOL
but i dont give the GOP a pass for spending like democrats either

 

[Synthaholic]

Democrats are not very civil


Fuck you!!!

 

[barry1960]

Horsecrap, bucs90. You have tried this nonsense repeatedly on the board. One, Nazi Germany was not leftist; that has been demonstrated over and over here. Two, you can't account for socialist successes like Sweden, Denmark, and other nations.

You can't even define "left" or "right" or "socialist" or "whatever" in historical and political terminology. You want to redefine it, then you always go hissy when you get caught out.

Hitler was fond of studying eugenics ideals of Karl Marx and G. Bernard Shaw, both lefties, although he hated them for being Jewish. Also, his movement was strongly structured in an early green movement, yes, even before seeing Al Gores movie. His Hitler Youth were preached the greatness of environmentalism, green cleanliness, "purity". This was to brainwash the kids into environmental purity, which would lead to purity of humanity ideals. He also wanted to ban citizen's from owning weapons, and have a complete takeover of healthcare, education, transportation. Sound familiar? If thats not enough, we'll, they literally called themselves "Socialists". Kinda hard to deny.

I know you guys don't like it, but it's the truth.

And those Euro examples are fine and all, but key difference: Their people didn't resist the movement, plain and simple. Left wing ideology is quite peaceful if everyone wants to go along. When they do not, the left gets very militant. History shows this over and over. If the folks of Denmark had rebelled centuries or decades ago against left wing ideals, violence from the gov't would've followed in order to take control.

You actually believe Hitler was a liberal? You are completely ignorant. The core teaching of the Hitler Youth was militarism and racial purity. Your evidence is that the Nazis called themselves socialists in their name? I guess the Peoples Republic of China is a democracy and the German Democratic Rebublic (East Germany) was also a democracy.

Here is one for you. How did trade unions under Nazi Germany? Try reading a book as opposed to getting your history lessons from right wing talk radio or a tea party rally.

 

[WillowTree]

So frickin funny. One time long ago I remember the Dems in Texas getting in a big snit and running away to Oklahoma to avoid debate and voting. what twits.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Democrats are not very civil


Fuck you!!!

Person who is armed with Knowledge of the facts is a very dangerous person wouldn't yoiu agree? Thats why you aren't a dangerous person.

 

[Bfgrn]

Horsecrap, bucs90. You have tried this nonsense repeatedly on the board. One, Nazi Germany was not leftist; that has been demonstrated over and over here. Two, you can't account for socialist successes like Sweden, Denmark, and other nations.

You can't even define "left" or "right" or "socialist" or "whatever" in historical and political terminology. You want to redefine it, then you always go hissy when you get caught out.

What Mao Zedong said about liberalism

"Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension.

It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency."

Combat Liberalism (7 September 1937), later quoted in Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong (The Little Red Book) (1964), Ch. 24.

While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians

 

[editec]

The natives are getting restless.