Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you free if government strong arms your health care provider to provide you with less health care?
Why should people who are not having babies subsidide the premiums of people who are?
ahh and you have no children.
Anyway I believe we should not give tax deductions based on how many children you have . You have em they are your responsibility.
Once they herd us all into those rooms and watch a subliminal message video, yes we all will know.Translation: Once the Government has full control.
Well, government knows best when it comes to your healthcare....
View attachment 11903
Are you free if government strong arms your health care provider to provide you with less health care?
Why should people who are not having babies subsidide the premiums of people who are?
ahh and you have no children.
Anyway I believe we should not give tax deductions based on how many children you have . You have em they are your responsibility.
My details don't matter, since you can tell us all sorts of things about yourself we can't verify.
Americans would trade fewer deductions for lower rates.
Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
I can't tell if you're arguing that cost containment is impossible or you're advocating for measures you've already demonized as "backdoor rationing" (e.g. discouraging unnecessary care) in this very thread.
Nobody is denying anything to anyone, who isn't ready and willing to pay for it, tovarich strawman.Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
I can't tell if you're arguing that cost containment is impossible or you're advocating for measures you've already demonized as "backdoor rationing" (e.g. discouraging unnecessary care) in this very thread.
Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
Why is it when I need an ultrasound of my liver, I can go to a private imaging center and they charge me $225, but when I use my insurance, they send me to the local hospital which charges $1600?
Far and away, claims, or services rendered drive the cost of health care more than anything else.
So the only way to cut costs is to cut services.
Why is it when I need an ultrasound of my liver, I can go to a private imaging center and they charge me $225, but when I use my insurance, they send me to the local hospital which charges $1600?
Because there's not enough government regulation at the private imaging center?