- Thread starter
- #21
I find it amusing that you think you have some meaningful criticism of BTK 2013 because he graphs total heat content (which you seem to think is an average) rather than temperature and then repeat your utter nonsensical current obsession concerning global average temperatures. And this after I show you 47 different, peer-reviewed studies that cite BTK 2013 and come to consistent conclusions.
Where is the peer reviewed work that - did your comments have any significance AT ALL - refutes BTK 2013?
Where is the peer reviewed work that - did your comments have any significance AT ALL - refutes BTK 2013?