Debunking the rightwing "class warfare" retard rhetoric

[Mr.Nick]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

Another classic example of liberals attempting to redefine the labels they have rightly earned.

Class warfare is defined this way: "taking money from those who earned and giving it to those who haven't earned it."

Reducing the rate of the pilfering is not class warfare. That definition is just sleazy demagoguery.

Don't you love how liberals rationalize their bullshit?

I work with this fuckhead liberal.....I caught the little screw eating a McDonalds cheeseburger and after I asserted he was a hypocrite the funky little fruitcakes response was "I'm feeding myself, besides I'm taking small bites."

I was like that evilness is pretty tasty eh?

Oh. after I got done smoking my evil cigarette (in which I only took small puffs ha) I bought ant apple from a dude and gave it to fat head libfuck with the big mouth..

True story......

 

[Bass v 2.0]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

No democrat has presided over a surplus either.

the national debt has gone up 53 years running.

As far as schools GW presided over one of the largest increase ever to education.

Glad we could clear up your misconceptions.

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

We've had bazillions of dollars thrown at that crap (not to mention all the well-heeled and fully benefited bureaucrats to administer those programs), yet still those problems persist...Like failure is evidence that liberoidal do-gooders need even more money and power.

We've been throwing taxcuts at the rich since Bush enacted the taxcuts and it has not spurred job creation nor has it stimulated the economy, in fact they've helped run up nothing but deficits, but it hasn't stopped you retarded from claiming that they are the answer.

Boo-fucking-hoo.

BTW, we haven't had a democratic preside over a balanced budget, let alone a surplus, either.

Time for you fake "moderates" to quit pretending you're not liberoidal statists.

You're a deluded liar, look at the stats:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Row 27 shows deficit or surplus, now tell me, who was president from 1998-2001? Who, in 2002 took a 24.6 billion dollar surplus and turned it into a nearly 307 billion dollar deficit, a Democrat or Republican? Please respond with facts, not rightwing retarded rants.



If class warfare is defined as having money taken from the rich and given to the poor, why are the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer? Who's really waging class warfare against whom financed by the Koch Brothers?

 

[Liability]

Helpful hint to the Basshole:

you cannot "debunk" that which is true.

Not even a nice try, dipshit.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

No democrat has presided over a surplus either.

the national debt has gone up 53 years running.

As far as schools GW presided over one of the largest increase ever to education.

Glad we could clear up your misconceptions.

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

Another classic example of liberals attempting to redefine the labels they have rightly earned.

Class warfare is defined this way: "taking money from those who earned and giving it to those who haven't earned it."

Reducing the rate of the pilfering is not class warfare. That definition is just sleazy demagoguery.

Don't you love how liberals rationalize their bullshit?

I work with this fuckhead liberal.....I caught the little screw eating a McDonalds cheeseburger and after I asserted he was a hypocrite the funky little fruitcakes response was "I'm feeding myself, besides I'm taking small bites."

I was like that evilness is pretty tasty eh?

Oh. after I got done smoking my evil cigarette (in which I only took small puffs ha) I bought ant apple from a dude and gave it to fat head libfuck with the big mouth..

True story......

When emotionally charged brainwashed morons get hit with facts they cannot refuted they respond with partisan hate laced tirades, I'd be mad too if I felt like a damn fool defending and advocating something that are lies that cannot be supported.

 

[Mr.Nick]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

No democrat has presided over a surplus either.

the national debt has gone up 53 years running.

As far as schools GW presided over one of the largest increase ever to education.

Glad we could clear up your misconceptions.

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

I bet you know nothing about the CRA....

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No democrat has presided over a surplus either.

the national debt has gone up 53 years running.

As far as schools GW presided over one of the largest increase ever to education.

Glad we could clear up your misconceptions.

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

Please read row 27 from the years 1998-2001 Mr Kochtard, and tell me what it says, deficit or surplus? Look at data from last 30 years and show me one Republitard president that has presided over a surplus. If the stats show that the ideology you retards spew and defend day and day out on this forum has a track record of *FAIL* why personally attack me?

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No democrat has presided over a surplus either.

the national debt has gone up 53 years running.

As far as schools GW presided over one of the largest increase ever to education.

Glad we could clear up your misconceptions.

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

I bet you know nothing about the CRA....

Answer the question retard, what info do you see in row 27 from the years 1998-2001 and who was president during that time?

 

[whitehall]

Class warfare is an arrogant former community activist who jets around the world on a whim at taxpayer expense criticizing the evil CEO's who use corporate jets and pay for the gas. Barry Hussein has gone beyond class warfare into the crazy scary world of neo-socialism. Remember when he referred to the US Chamber of Commerce as a subversive tool of the GOP?

 

[Mr.Nick]

Another classic example of liberals attempting to redefine the labels they have rightly earned.

Class warfare is defined this way: "taking money from those who earned and giving it to those who haven't earned it."

Reducing the rate of the pilfering is not class warfare. That definition is just sleazy demagoguery.

Don't you love how liberals rationalize their bullshit?

I work with this fuckhead liberal.....I caught the little screw eating a McDonalds cheeseburger and after I asserted he was a hypocrite the funky little fruitcakes response was "I'm feeding myself, besides I'm taking small bites."

I was like that evilness is pretty tasty eh?

Oh. after I got done smoking my evil cigarette (in which I only took small puffs ha) I bought ant apple from a dude and gave it to fat head libfuck with the big mouth..

True story......

When emotionally charged brainwashed morons get hit with facts they cannot refuted they respond with partisan hate laced tirades, I'd be mad too if I felt like a damn fool defending and advocating something that are lies that cannot be supported.

But you do lie and allow your emotions to get in the way.

Either that or you were brainwashed.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Helpful hint to the Basshole:

you cannot "debunk" that which is true.

Not even a nice try, dipshit.

Lkie are easy to debunk and one cannot *HONESTLY* defend a lie except that he be brainwashed or intellectually dishonest from the start.

 

[Liability]

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

Please read row 27 from the years 1998-2001 Mr Kochtard, and tell me what it says, deficit or surplus? Look at data from last 30 years and show me one Republitard president that has presided over a surplus. If the stats show that the ideology you retards spew and defend day and day out on this forum has a track record of *FAIL* why personally attack me?

The word is Republican. And you would recognize that fact if you'd take your partisan hate-tinged glasses off, dipshit, and ask how a President of either Party "presides" over a "surplus."

In the case of Bubba Clintube, it took a Republican controlled Congress. It helped to "preside" fortuitously over the dot-com bubble, too.

But go ahead and be an obvious asshole, Basshole, by ignoring all facts that undermine your silly "point."

Shithead.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Don't you love how liberals rationalize their bullshit?

I work with this fuckhead liberal.....I caught the little screw eating a McDonalds cheeseburger and after I asserted he was a hypocrite the funky little fruitcakes response was "I'm feeding myself, besides I'm taking small bites."

I was like that evilness is pretty tasty eh?

Oh. after I got done smoking my evil cigarette (in which I only took small puffs ha) I bought ant apple from a dude and gave it to fat head libfuck with the big mouth..

True story......

When emotionally charged brainwashed morons get hit with facts they cannot refuted they respond with partisan hate laced tirades, I'd be mad too if I felt like a damn fool defending and advocating something that are lies that cannot be supported.

But you do lie and allow your emotions to get in the way.

Either that or you were brainwashed.

If I have lied refute my lies with official data, otherwise get back to your chicken coop and get to cackling there, I have no time to address hate-laced partisan hackery.

 

[auditor0007]

How about forming two countries out of what the USA is today, one capitalist based the other socialist based, and we see who does better. Everyones happy cause they get what they want.

Deal?

Okay dumbo. The only problem is that you have no idea what socialism is. You just like to call anything other than a completely free market society socialism. BTW, we don't have and never will have a completely free market society, especially when we constantly subsidize big business and the super wealthy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

Sure, Amos, sure.

Obama's gotten black unemployment to 16% but you keeps on keeping on going to your fine public schools

 

[Bass v 2.0]

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

Please read row 27 from the years 1998-2001 Mr Kochtard, and tell me what it says, deficit or surplus? Look at data from last 30 years and show me one Republitard president that has presided over a surplus. If the stats show that the ideology you retards spew and defend day and day out on this forum has a track record of *FAIL* why personally attack me?

The word is Republican. And you would recognize that fact if you'd take your partisan hate-tinged glasses off, dipshit, and ask how a President of either Party "presides" over a "surplus."

In the case of Bubba Clintube, it took a Republican controlled Congress. It helped to "preside" fortuitously over the dot-com bubble, too.

But go ahead and be an obvious asshole, Basshole, by ignoring all facts that undermine your silly "point."

Shithead.

We had a Republican president from the years 1998-2001? You need a history lesson in US presidents Mr Liabilitard.


Clinton had veto power and could have easily vetoed anything the Republitards did so your fruit loop party gets no credit.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

No Democratic President has presided over a surplus over the last 30 years? What a moron:

U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis


Look at column 27 then look at years 1998-2001, who was president of the United States, an independent? Column 27 shows either a deficit or surplus.

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

Please read row 27 from the years 1998-2001 Mr Kochtard, and tell me what it says, deficit or surplus? Look at data from last 30 years and show me one Republitard president that has presided over a surplus. If the stats show that the ideology you retards spew and defend day and day out on this forum has a track record of *FAIL* why personally attack me?

Reread your entire thread. Where have I spouted any stats or ideologies? No where. I did however point out that you use all kinds of vulgar words to describe those you don't agree with. All the while quoting the bible in your sig. That is not a personal attack it is an observation and a fact. You should remove that from your sig cause you clearly have no concept of what the bible teaches and are just using in to promote your view of politics. Kinda like Tim McVeigh did....

 

[Liability]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

Sure, Amos, sure.

Obama's gotten black unemployment to 16% but you keeps on keeping on going to your fine public schools

What was the black unemployment rate before Obamanomics helped the plight of the black Americans seeking jobs?

 

[Mr.Nick]

What kind of hypocrite are you? You call people all manner of names on here all the while quoting biblical scripture in your sig.

Please read row 27 from the years 1998-2001 Mr Kochtard, and tell me what it says, deficit or surplus? Look at data from last 30 years and show me one Republitard president that has presided over a surplus. If the stats show that the ideology you retards spew and defend day and day out on this forum has a track record of *FAIL* why personally attack me?

The word is Republican. And you would recognize that fact if you'd take your partisan hate-tinged glasses off, dipshit, and ask how a President of either Party "presides" over a "surplus."

In the case of Bubba Clintube, it took a Republican controlled Congress. It helped to "preside" fortuitously over the dot-com bubble, too.

But go ahead and be an obvious asshole, Basshole, by ignoring all facts that undermine your silly "point."

Shithead.

It took Al Sharpton and his racist blacks to guilt republicans into meeting their demands of free mortgages.

Because you know, credit is racist.