ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,945
- 53,295
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #121
Rich people have served without lining up for the trough. I'm sure Pelosi has used her inside information to make investments. McConnell has specifically sided with making importing goods easier.She's somehow different from McConnell?And we are fucked unless these yahoos start working together for all of us.
Why would they do that? Nancy Pelosi became worth 120,000,000.00 doing the opposite. So seriously whats their incentive? And if the citizens get restless well they just import more citizens.
And Pelosi did force Paygo before the recession. Imo the dems are acting as they have since LBJ. The gop stopped being reasonable when the Freedom Caucus decided people would vote to end soc sec. They won't. Not if the dems give them another option.
OK so Mitch mcconell is worth 22,500,000.00
My point is the same. Whats the incentive for them? Looks like running the US bankrupt is highly profitable.
" Democracy and ‘progressive democracy’ are synonymous, and indistinguishable from the expansion of the state. Whilst ‘extreme right wing’ governments have, on rare occasions, momentarily arrested this process, its reversal lies beyond the bounds of democratic possibility. Since winning elections is overwhelmingly a matter of vote buying, and society’s informational organs (education and media) are no more resistant to bribery than the electorate, a thrifty politician is simply an incompetent politician, and the democratic variant of Darwinism quickly eliminates such misfits from the gene pool. This is a reality that the left applauds, the establishment right grumpily accepts, and the libertarian right has ineffectively railed against."
Moldbug
But McConnell to his credit, imo, did support a bipartisan agreement to raise future revenues less than the amount what would have been saved by reducing spending increases on social programs. And Obama supported it. Neither with wholehearted enthusiasm.
But the freedom caucus killed it. The votes were there in the House to pass it on a bipartisan vote, but Boehner wouldn't bring it up for a vote.
There's NO way cut spending without both parties buying in. McConnell says it. Obama did too. And McConnell said the issue is dead so long as Trump is potus. And that's largely why I'd vote for anyone but Hillary who opposes him. Biden too, I guess, but only because I really think he's lost his mind. He's reminding me of my old dog who died last month after suffering dementia for over a year. LOL The dog was lot more loveable though.
Pelosi made her money by giving away yours in exchange for votes. But that shouldn't be a revelation. Its harder to get rich giving away your own money.
It isnt rich people specifically...our Founders were rich and they set up a government they thought would be honest. Its power. And yes wealth and power often go together.
All I am asking here is what is the incentive? Why would politicians give up the power inherent in giving away money they didnt earn?
This guy gets it!