S
Shattered
Guest
Why do they need to be let out to walk in a circle? They have a 6x6 room to walk around in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shattered said:What "work" can they possibly do? Anything they can do to earn their keep can be done by someone that actually *needs* a job to survive.
Shattered said:There's the chance that even 1 of those 1mil people you have convicted for murder will get out via good behavior, or some glitch in the system.. Then what?
I'd just rather they're not a potential problem. For anyone. For every moment you leave them alive, and for every dollar that you spend on their upkeep, that's one moment and/or one dollar that could have gone to a much more worthwhile cause. Our prisons are overcrowded as it is.. Start nuking some of the bastards on death row.
Personally, I think if you're put on death row in 1995, you should be ash by the end of 1995 at the lastest. Convicted in Jan 1995? Ash by Dec. 31st, 1995. Convicted in Nov. 1995? Ash by Dec. 31st 1996.
Maybe then some people will straighten the hell up. Why would they have it any better than some homeless person? And by better, I mean something as simple as a warm place to sleep.
April 23, 2005
Ecclesiastes states, There is an appointed time for everything a time to give birth and a time to die; a time to embrace and a time to shun embracing, and among other things, there is, a time to kill. Guess what time I think it is for John Evander Couey and David Onstott?
With our nations attention rightly riveted on the macabre murders of little Jessica Lundsford and Sarah Lunde, I think I just heard the clock strike Death:30 for the irretrievable duo who carried out these sickening slayings. I question the humanity, sanity, and if youre religious, the sanctity, of everyone who vies for sustaining the lives of Couey and Onstott, the confessed murderers of 10-year-old Jessica and 13-year-old Sarah.
In addition to it being a time to kill these two sacks of dung, I think the judicial morons who previously gave wispy sentences to such dregs and released them without performing a chemical castration and a phallectomy with a rusty fork, and without branding SOB on these losers foreheads, ought to go directly to prison for aiding and abetting these bastards. And I use the word bastard in a biblical sense.
Furthermore, I believe Kelly Lunde, Sarahs mom, who actually dated Onstott, the convicted rapist who eventually killed her daughter, who didnt report her child missing for two, thats two, days, should to be forced to spend a few years in the Stupid Ward of What Were You Thinking Hospital.
Yknow, its amazing to me that these two recidivist rapists were allowed to free range while our legal wizards felt the need to Lojack Martha Stewart and treat her like Hannibal Lecter for lying. I would venture to say that the scales of justice are now more unbalanced in the United States of Asininity than Margot Kidder trying to work a treadmill after a quart of corn liquor.
Let me see if Im getting this sage judicial insight right. Tight-leashing a 60-year-old billionaire blonde Jurassic diva in her multi-million dollar mansion is a must, and letting Chester the Molester run free and relatively unsupervised to skulk our schoolyards, playgrounds, ice cream parlors and churches is okay?
What the heck is wrong with us?
How many raped pre-pubescent girls have to be buried alive in shallow graves before we enact lethal Moses-like sanctions on these nightcrawlers and send them quickly to a just God who will, in turn, overnight them to an eternal hell?
Heres what I think needs to happen to a person found guilty of raping and/or killing a kid.
I think said person should
1. Be executed immediately. Like, within a couple of days. Yep wait maybe two days, max, after the conviction, and then swiftly turn them into a grease stain. And just to err on the side of mercy, because Im a Christian, have whatever family and friends wholl claim them come to pay their last respects, vomit on them or whatever.
After that, let them have their last supper of Vienna Sausages, pickled eggs and a nice cold cup of tobacco spit, then have the father of the victim they raped/killed come forward and throw the switch on a substantial pack of C4 and publicly explode these Darwinian holdovers to smithereens. With, of course, the entire nation watching and a live cable feed fed straight to every jail cell inhabited by a child molester.
Shattered said:
You would limit the time for deathrow inmates to 1 year - 365 days in which to possibly clear their names?!?
If they didn't clear their name the first time, there's not too much of a chance of them clearing it later.
Generally, violent criminals being convicted are the results of some pretty strong DNA evidence...
"I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other mens rights." - Abraham Lincoln
Merlin1047 said:There are some acts so heinous and some people so evil that killing them is the only effective and appropriate punishment. I fully support the concept that some crimes should be punishable by killing the perpetrator.
That said, I do not support the death penalty in its present form. Given the number of people who have been sentenced to death only to be released after being proven innocent, we have to extrapolate from that data, the fact the we have undoubtedly killed many people who did not commit the crime for which they were executed. That is absolutely unacceptable.
The death penalty should be put in abeyance until uniform and consistent laws and procedures are adopted by all fifty states. In order to impose the death penalty, the jury's verdict and the judge's sentence must be based on hard scientifice evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, videotape etc. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable in most cases.
Not only do laws need to be revamped, but sentencing guidelines need to be made consistent also. State's rights issues aside, it is not appropriate to impose a death penalty for a crime in Arkansas, while the same crime in Missouri gets 20 years to life. In addition, our courts are notorious for going easy on the rich. A millionaire with an entourage of shysters can buy a lot more "justice" that an indigent with a public defender. Sentencing guidelines would not put an end to that problem, but they would serve to reduce it.
Those who favor life in prison in lieu of the death penalty tend to overlook an unfortunate fact of life. Thanks to the ACLU, idiot judges and bleeding heart activist morons, our prison system has deteriorated from a place of punishment into a warehouse for evil people. Where can you find the best law libraries? Prison. Gymnasiums? Prison. Prisoner and their sycophants have made a mockery out of the concept that a prison sentence is imposed to PUNISH, not rehabilitate. Perhaps it will take a constitutional amendment, but I believe that as part of a prison sentence, you forfeit your rights as a citizen. The only rights a convict should have are basic human rights. Otherwise, they should be worked all day, every day till their damn tongues hang out like a red necktie. That's what I call rehabilitation. You make prison so terrible that they don't want to come back for another tour.