Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,827
- 1,790
cptpwichita said:You don't support the fair tax?
Nope, Jeff and I went round and round with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
cptpwichita said:You don't support the fair tax?
Appeal my ass. If a person is convicted of a crime, proven beyond ANY reasonable doubt, there should be no appeal.deaddude said:The reason it takes so long is that capital offenses carry and automatic appeal. The thing can get tied up in court for decades.
Sounds like the type of thinking they did in the "good book"Joz said:Appeal my ass. If a person is convicted of a crime, proven beyond ANY reasonable doubt, there should be no appeal.
I don't understand what point you're trying to make.JOKER96BRAVO said:Sounds like the type of thinking they did in the "good book"......
cptpwichita said:You want less crime?
Secure the borders!
You want less crime?
Enact the fair tax to help create jobs!
You want less crime?
Privatize the schools and go to a voucher system!
You want less crime?
Move to private retirement accounts and if someone screws up-SEIZE THE FUNDS FROM THE ACCOUNT (nothing could be worse than knowing that you could be living down by the beach in florida having pina coladas playing shuffle board but you screwed up and are now attempting to fight off the sodomites on a daily basis!).
Keep criminals from entering our country,create jobs,put more money in peoples pockets,better education and a brighter future!
That is how we should be lowering the crime rate!
cptpwichita said:You want less crime?
Secure the borders!
You want less crime?
Enact the fair tax to help create jobs!
You want less crime?
Privatize the schools and go to a voucher system!
You want less crime?
Move to private retirement accounts and if someone screws up-SEIZE THE FUNDS FROM THE ACCOUNT (nothing could be worse than knowing that you could be living down by the beach in florida having pina coladas playing shuffle board but you screwed up and are now attempting to fight off the sodomites on a daily basis!).
Keep criminals from entering our country,create jobs,put more money in peoples pockets,better education and a brighter future!
That is how we should be lowering the crime rate!
ScreamingEagle said:Or at least have them work to offset their room and board. Plus how about teaching them religion for rehabilitation purposes? Or do you think libs would consider that to be extreme punishment? I'm sure the ACLU would not want God anywhere in the state prisons.
GotZoom said:Here is another thought:
How about making prison an unpleasant place to be?
No TV, Radio, Computers, Gyms, Librarys?
How about a 6X6 cell with one hour per day outside to walk silently in a circle.
How about a bucket in the corner to take care of your bathroom duties.
When people realize that their life INSIDE of prison is worse than OUTSIDE, instead of the other way around........
deaddude said:The harshness of the prison should depend on the crime. If you send a petty theif to half of the places you mentioned and he survived his stay he would come out a psycopath.
deaddude said:Pick pockets, non violent small scale burglaries, Televangelist scams, that kind of thing
pegwinn said:For starters, I support the death penalty. I think there is room for improvement. First off, we need to ensure the absolute truth of the matter. This requires a truth machine.
The reason the d/p is more expensive than life imprisonment is that the entire time you are on death row, there is a legal proceding in progress. Your lawyers are constantly making motions, filing appeals, etc. No one simply sits on death row.
Back when I first checked out this board I wrote an opinion on prisons. You might find it interesting (and I won't need to retype to reply to this thread) Time to fix the prisons
But, to actually achieve justice, there is an even more radical solution. More radical than emptying the prisons. More than eliminating the death penalty. It involves actually making truth the number one tenet of justice. This one garnered some sharp responses. The point here is to actually know for a fact that the guilty are the ones getting punished. Bring Back Superman
I don't understand the your truth, my truth thing to be honest. I believe there is only one truth. There may be many beliefs that apply to the truth. But, if we could focus questions with absolute knowlege that we were being told the truth by the person we were questioning, it would be better. Imagine simply asking the accused, "Did you rob the seven eleven last thursday at four pm?". If the answer is no, then you move to the next suspect. Imagine the number of innocent people not tried, let alone wrongly convicted.Yurt said:I read some of your earlier cited posts, good reads, but will not go into more as it would be off subject.
As to "truth." What is it? Your truth? My truth? Whose truth? I have often pondered this, for my profession has me looking at both sides of the argument, regardless of the truth. It is like warfare, know your enemy's position and you can destroy your enemy. At first I had a hard time, as to see the "other" side I had to contemplate what I considered "untruth," or something I considered false. What I have learned is, truth is not always what it seems. For there is your truth and there is my truth.
I am not talking criminal, rather civil disagreements. Nonetheless, even in criminal cases, the truth can depend on the witness. There are five witnesses to the same event. As you know, you will get five truths. Maybe together they all equal "the" truth, however, you still have five different versions of it and must amalgmate them into one.
Truth is the base of every charge, of every defense. I believe though that finding it is not as easy as it seems. Do I think too much is spent on prisoners, especially those in death row? Yes. However, think of the innocent that we have killed. Think of the innocent that have been set free with modern science (DNA). In those jurors minds, they were guilty. That was "their" truth. But it was not "the" truth.
IMO
pegwinn said:I don't understand the your truth, my truth thing to be honest. I believe there is only one truth. There may be many beliefs that apply to the truth. But, if we could focus questions with absolute knowlege that we were being told the truth by the person we were questioning, it would be better. Imagine simply asking the accused, "Did you rob the seven eleven last thursday at four pm?". If the answer is no, then you move to the next suspect. Imagine the number of innocent people not tried, let alone wrongly convicted.
GotZoom said:Here is another thought:
How about making prison an unpleasant place to be?
No TV, Radio, Computers, Gyms, Librarys?
How about a 6X6 cell with one hour per day outside to walk silently in a circle.
How about a bucket in the corner to take care of your bathroom duties.
When people realize that their life INSIDE of prison is worse than OUTSIDE, instead of the other way around........